On 4/23/10 4:25 PM, Deri James wrote:
Is there a way to include a jpeg or png image in a groff file? No
hack too cheap!
If you want to embed a graphic into postscript output you have to convert the
format to EPS (Encapsulated PostScript) and then you can use the .PSPIC macro
to embed the .ep
On 10-Jun-10 21:01:34, Tadziu Hoffmann wrote:
>> So either something has changed the numerical encoding of \[ua]
>> in groff (but despite searching I have found no clue), or possibly
>> the input characters "\[ua]" were mis-interpreted as "\[uA]".
>> Could this have something to do with locale?
>
> So either something has changed the numerical encoding of \[ua]
> in groff (but despite searching I have found no clue), or possibly
> the input characters "\[ua]" were mis-interpreted as "\[uA]".
> Could this have something to do with locale?
I don't believe it has do do with locale. I get t
Tadziu Hoffmann:
The error must have been introduced between
1.19.2 and 1.19.3, and it's a bug in the mm
macros, not in troff, as you can see by sourc-
ing the 1.19.2 mm macros with troff 1.20.1
(and vice versa).
If you edit the current mm macros and move the
addr
Greetings folks,
This one is puzzling me (and it may be that I have missed an
upgrade/bugfix).
I wanted to plant an upward-pointing arrow with the single-line
shaft. In .../font/devps/S (and SS) this is listed as "\[ua]",
PostScript name "arrowup", with octal code 0255 (173 decimal).
However, whe
Hello,
With your help, Ralf, and the last command line
you've given, I've discovered that my problem came
from .lf request added by preconv:
* My bashrc was containing GROFF_ENCODING="UTF-8"
* I thought that commenting this line and sourcing
bashrc would remove it, but not...
Fortuna
Hi Pierre-Jean,
> Well, as on Fedora I get "a b".
> I've looked at the arch packages, it doesn't contain any patches, just
> a site.tmac for man and mdoc. Here is the pkgbuild:
> http://repos.archlinux.org/wsvn/packages/groff/repos/core-i686/PKGBUILD
I'll try and have a dig around there.
> So,
Macro names containing the e-mail 'dog' symbol got
replaced with addr...@hidden. Here's an updated
version, where [dog] is used istead of the actual
symbol:
.am pg[dog]set-new-trap
. if \\n[ft*note-size]>0 \{\
. nr pg*foot-trap -1v
. \}
..
.am pg[dog]enable-trap
.
Ralph Corderoy wrote:
>
> printf 'foo\n\n' | nroff <(printf 'a\n.rd\nb\n') | grep .
>
> produces "a foo b". A friend's tried that on his ArchLinux and it also
> works. Another friend has tried on OpenBSD and it works, but on
>
> Fedora, version 1.18.1.4
>
> he gets "a b" which suggests
