ing into the systems you are agreeing to all this". Something that, like
Stormy's honor code, is a *reminder*, but not necessarily a legal agreement
that people have to then study and get their companies to agree to.
-Sheeri Cabral
Manager, Systems DB Team
Senior DB Admin
;s a problem, we end up with a lot of unhappy Mozillians.
The summit was 1/3 employees, 2/3 community members. If we give emails to
everyone who made the cut for the summit, that would triple our current email
infrastructure. Are we prepared to spend more time on the e-mail infrastructure
to
- Original Message -
From: "Benjamin Kerensa"
Cc: mozilla-governa...@lists.mozilla.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 3:29:11 AM
Subject: Re: sponsored new tab tiles - please tell me this is a (bad) joke
I have to say right now on Google+ and on other Social Media networks there
are
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Kelly"
To: "Sheeri Cabral"
Cc: mozilla-governa...@lists.mozilla.org, "Benjamin Kerensa"
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 9:08:09 AM
Subject: Re: sponsored new tab tiles - please tell me this is a (bad) joke
I do
- Original Message -
From: "Benjamin Kerensa"
To: "Majken Connor"
Cc: "Sheeri Cabral" , "Michael Kelly"
, mozilla-governa...@lists.mozilla.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 10:25:21 AM
Subject: Re: sponsored new tab tiles - please tell m
It's definitely something that threw us off-balance. However, I don't
understand how Mozilla is responsible for all the pressure that external forces
like Team Rarebit and OK Cupid put on Brendan, that eventually caused him to
step down.
-Sheeri Cabral
Manager, Systems DB Team
Senio
orted is untrue. What can we do to convince people of the
truth - that he stepped down because of *external* pressure, from companies
like Team Rarebit and OK Cupid?
-Sheeri Cabral
Manager, Systems DB Team
Senior DB Admin/Architect
Mozilla
___
governan
pressure, and not
lack of internal support. I say this as an internal supporter of Brendan who
believes in same-sex marriage.
-Sheeri Cabral
Manager, Systems DB Team
Senior DB Admin/Architect
Mozilla
- Original Message -
From: ifbitd...@gmail.com
To: mozilla-governa...@lists.mozilla.org
rected
discussions. But I defend their right to say it.
-Sheeri Cabral
Manager, Systems DB Team
Senior DB Admin/Architect
Mozilla
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Connor"
To: "Gervase Markham" , mozilla-governa...@lists.mozilla.org
Sent: Monday, April 7, 2014 10:50:56
Dennis,
It would absolutely NOT be appropriate for Mozilla to censure *anyone*. Mozilla
believes in keeping the web open so that everyone can speak their mind,
regardless of whether any individual agrees with what is being said.
-Sheeri Cabral
Manager, Systems DB Team
Senior DB Admin
ution."
Also, I see you've pointed out that all the employees you listed are employees
of the Mozilla Foundation. The Mozilla Foundation is above Mozilla Corporation.
Brendan was the CEO of Mozilla Corporation and wasn't the boss of any of the
people you linked to.
-Sheeri Cabral
e hand, someone from Engagement should talk to the petitioners and
explain that we did not fire Brendan or coerce him to resign. On the other
hand, if it's not really affecting usage, is it worth it?
-Sheeri Cabral
Manager, Systems DB Team
Senior DB Admin/Architect
Mozilla
- Original Message -
There was no noticeable drop in the past 2 weeks, but it took a while to
interpret the data and account for the normal peaks and valleys, so we did not
have any information until early this week.
-Sheeri Cabral
Manager, Systems DB Team
Senior DB Admin/Architect
Mozilla
- Original Message
I agree with what others have said, and I'll throw in an alternative idea.
Here's some changes I made, taking out redundancies (e.g. behaving
appropriately is covered under the participation guidelines), and putting the
"you can end your participation" part at the end. Because that's not the fi
For the data quality and privacy sides, you probably want someone like Alex
Fowler. (So, consider it a nomination).
I'm happy to be a peer if having a DB-type person, who can handle the actual
implementation, is useful. (if not I'm happy to stand back too).
-Sheeri Cabral
Manager,
> afaik punching a whole in the great firewall isn't that hard (openvpn
> might be enough?) So if Mozilla really wants a fight providing something
> better is at least theoretically possible.
"Can't we just..." syndrome is particularly nasty when we are talking about
cultural stuff we don't rea
governance@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
>
--
-Sheeri Cabral
Manager, Data Team at Mozilla
File a bug for the Data Team -
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Data%20%26%20BI%20Services%20Team
Find the Data team on #data on irc.mozilla.org
there location
> > set
> > > like so and fix it.
> > >
> > > Vladimir Krstic
> > > ___
> > > governance mailing list
> > > governance@lists.mozilla.org
> > > https://lists.mozilla.org/
first version of the
> Social API was Facebook only. Something has to go first, and
> it's way easier to do that with a single partner for a v1.
So you saying that it's more difficult runs contrary to what Mozilla has
done historically, and successfully.
--
-Sheeri Cabral
ally give you a concrete reason not to trust
themall you have now is speculation.
--
-Sheeri Cabral
Manager, Data Team at Mozilla
File a bug for the Data Team -
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Data%20%26%20BI%20Services%20Team
Find the Data team on #data on irc.mozilla.org
> On Jun 17, 2015, at 7:39 PM, Angly Cat wrote:
> Mozilla isn't a cult or some sort of religion. The logic behind their
> decisions needs to be explained to the community. Can it be explained though?
It *was* explained over replies in the past few weeks, but not accepted as good
enough explan
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Dan Stillman wrote:
> On 6/17/15 8:33 PM, Sheeri Cabral wrote:
> Mozilla is both a company and one of the world's most successful
> open-source projects. It's nice that you work for the former, but the rest
> of us are trying to contribute t
- Original Message -
From: "David Bruant"
But as said Henri Sivonen: "I think Mozilla would give a more truthful
picture of its decision making if it didn't describe itself as a
meritocracy."
Maybe that instead of "meritocracy" we need to find (or create?) a
better wording that take
The reason? My conjecture is that Christian Christmas (the Dec. 25th one, as
opposed to Greek or Russian Orthodox Christmas) is a holiday that Marketing
believes is celebrated by a vast majority of our followers/fans/whatever.
I'd bet they have plans to say "Happy New Year", too. Because a vast
e about human rights issues, but there's only so much we can
police, and it would be awful if we made a mistake and rejected an addon that
we *thought* was "bad" but is really "good", and accepted an addon that
*looked* "good" but in reality was "bad&
25 matches
Mail list logo
