Thank you Emma! As someone that has poured my heart into mozilla for
the past 14 years, your email warmed my heart.
/ Jonas
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Emma Irwin wrote:
> Hi Fred,
>
> Hi, I'm a volunteer with Mozilla. I volunteer teaching children
> about the web at my children's school a
Sounds good to me!
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Fabrice Desré wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We already have a bugzilla component in Core called "DOM: apps" that is
> used to track patches related to the navigator.mozApps api and
> product-specific hooks. However we don't have official ownership of thi
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Rubén Martín
wrote:
> * It's not the first time we take decisions because everyone else is
> doing it, and we want to keep being relevant.
> o This worries me the most looking at the future, since we are
> going to be always the only ones with
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 8:40 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
> However, I note that with the Hollywood studios, and to some extent the
> companies behind the other browsers, a lack of outrage is less
> surprising, because - little though we like it - that sort of thing is
> what we *expect* them to do, ba
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 8:43 PM, Jim wrote:
> What are Mozilla going to do when some CDM innovations allows HTTP requests
> to be passed to the CDM and received and presented in the web browser? This
> will effectively add DRM to any web content. The EME solution requires JS to
> complete the play
Hi All,
I'd like to add a new Browser API module. This module would cover the
functionality that we use in B2G to render apps and browser windows.
It will also cover widgets once we get those.
Module details are as follows.
Name: Browser API
Description: Web API for rendering apps, browser windo
Done!
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'd like to add a new Browser API module. This module would cover the
> functionality that we use in B2G to render apps and browser windows.
> It will also cover widgets once we get those.
>
> Mod
Hi All,
I'd like to propose a new module for covering the emulators we're
currently using for FirefoxOS hardware emulators. This is part of an
effort to give these emulators some much needed love and attention.
Name: FirefoxOS Emulators
Description: Hardware emulators for host environments to run
Please note that neither module ownership nor module peer is not given
based on who we expect will work on something. It's based on who has
deep knowledge and experience with a piece of code.
Owner vs. Peer is a very small difference. Basically the only
difference is that it's the owners responsib
Note that being an owner/peer doesn't require actively writing code
for the relevant module. It just means having expertise knowledge
about its code, and willingness to guide others that want to
contribute. I.e. doing reviews and providing guidance and vision as
needed.
So just because you're not
You have my sword!
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 1:57 PM, wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'd like to propose a new module for tracking protection. We are continuing
> to investigate options in tracking and have tried out a few ideas. One of
> them, Tracking Protection, looks like it will ship in Seamonkey a
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 12:56 PM, wrote:
> No one is going to opt-out, either. I already feel like a criminal opting-out
> of the huge "invalid SSL certificate" warnings
For what it's worth, we know that the "invalid SSL cert" warning is
triggered by attackers trying to hack people's network tr
Same here!
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Johnny Stenback wrote:
> Agreed, sounds good to me as well. Thanks!
>
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Brendan Eich wrote:
>> This sounds good to me; another de-facto module to recognize in the de-jure
>> system. Thanks,
>>
>> /be
>>
>> Gavin Sharp
Hi Ehsan,
I'd really like to get some clarity in what the purpose of the private
browsing feature is supposed to be. Last we talked about this the
answer seemed to be "it's different things to different people. Only
thing that we agree on is that a private browsing window should not
write data to
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ehsan,
>>
>> I'd really like to get some clarity in what the purpose of the private
>> browsing feature is supposed to be. Last we talked
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 12:15 AM, Kan-Ru Chen (陳侃如) wrote:
> smaug writes:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>> I'd like to propose a new module: Event Handling
>> It would deal with all the code under dom/events, but also event handling
>> related code elsewhere, like
>> in widget/* and PresShell. (but APZ ha
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Ehsan Akhgari
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> >>
>> >
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
>> I think it'd be great to have a short and clear list of what the
>> private browsing feature is. I think your wiki page is a great start
>> to that. It's definitely is short enough that you can read through it
>> and get an understanding of
Note that Ravi is currently the privacy data steward for FirefoxOS. So
if this module isn't just about building the infrastructure for
collecting data, but also for deciding which data is collected, then
he probably needs to be involved.
/ Jonas
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Francisco Jordano
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 6:06 AM, Gervase Markham wrote:
>> When a Module Owner is also a Mozilla employee who then leaves Mozilla, it
>> seems prudent that their Module Ownership is relinquished.
>
> I would be very uneasy with this being the default. Module Ownership is
> a Mozilla project positi
On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Mitchell Baker wrote:
> Hello
>
> Benjamin Smedberg pinged me to say that he would find it useful if I were to
> implement the idea of Emeritus Module Owners. I also suspect this would
> help existing module owners feel recognized and thus better about passing o
Sounds good to me!
/ Jonas
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Johnny Stenback wrote:
> +1, also, hi Sid! :)
>
> - jst
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 1:43 PM, wrote:
>> Hi Governance people,
>>
>> Recently I've not been as active in the content security work as I wanted to
>> be, so I've decided
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:39 AM, wrote:
> I was very surprised to be looking through my Pocket bookmarks to find
> advertising there. I was totally unaware that this was a non-open source for
> profit application that was bundled with Firefox.
>
> I don't know about you, but I believe that a n
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Johnny Stenback wrote:
> The Cycle Collector currently lives as part of the XPCOM module, but the
> XPCOM module owners/peers are not the people who do the majority of the
> work on the Cycle Collector. Also, the people who do the majority of
> the work are *not* XP
24 matches
Mail list logo
