Dave Camp wrote:
I've been working with Mitchell and some other folks over the past few
months to better reflect Firefox technical leadership in the module
ownership system. I think we're at a point where we're ready to make the
first proposal:
> [..]
awesome :)
It seems clear that the modul
On 8 March 2018 at 01:27, Byron Jones via governance <
governance@lists.mozilla.org> wrote:
> there's a few modules listed as applicable at first glance appear to be
> obsolete:
>
>- BrowserID
>>
>
I can confirm that this module is 100% obsolete. The few remaining places
where we use BrowserI
Would EKR and my commitment (representing moco leadership) and Mitchell's
commitment (representing project leadership) that we'll revisit and revise
the description if the org structure changes be sufficient to address your
concerns?
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 10:32 PM mhoye via governance <
governanc
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 2:27 PM Byron Jones wrote:
> Dave Camp wrote:
> > I've been working with Mitchell and some other folks over the past few
> > months to better reflect Firefox technical leadership in the module
> > ownership system. I think we're at a point where we're ready to make the
> >
The "Other/BrowserID" module is obsolete and should be removed:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Modules/Other#BrowserID
The code and services that it covers have mostly been decommissioned, and
the few remaining pieces of BrowserID-derived technology that we still use
are squarely owned by the "Firefo
On 2018-03-07 2:16 PM, Dave Camp wrote:
Would EKR and my commitment (representing moco leadership) and
Mitchell's commitment (representing project leadership) that we'll
revisit and revise the description if the org structure changes be
sufficient to address your concerns?
Yes, definitely.
