Would EKR and my commitment (representing moco leadership) and Mitchell's commitment (representing project leadership) that we'll revisit and revise the description if the org structure changes be sufficient to address your concerns?
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 10:32 PM mhoye via governance < governance@lists.mozilla.org> wrote: > On 2018-03-02 4:43 PM, Ben Kelly via governance wrote: > > > Why is this tied to the Mozilla Corporation org chart? > > I have a similar concern; this proposal seems to imply long-term > commitment to on the part of the Mozilla Corporation to a specific > organizational structure supporting it. > > I can see good arguments for and against that, so think I have a case > there either way. But I do think that if this proposal requires that > commitment on the part of MoCo, we should be explicit in specifying (and > obtaining!) that commitment. > > > > - mhoye > > > > > _______________________________________________ > governance mailing list > governance@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance > _______________________________________________ governance mailing list governance@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
