Re: Module list updates are needed

2015-10-20 Thread Benjamin Kerensa
Indeed many modules still list Brendan as either a peer or owner and as far as I know his participation even as a volunteer is uncertain. On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Eric Shepherd wrote: > I've been looking through the module list > (https://wiki.mozilla.org/Modules/All) since we're tryin

Re: Surveillance principles draft

2015-10-20 Thread sopa arbuckle
On Wednesday, September 2, 2015 at 10:53:09 PM UTC+1, mer...@mozilla.com wrote: > Hi all, > > Members of the platform, policy, and legal teams at Mozilla have been working > to create a set of principles that should serve as a guide to government > surveillance activities, and that are grounded

Re: proposed module: Emeritus Module Owners

2015-10-20 Thread Myk Melez
Gregory Szorc 2015 October 17 at 12:59 I wholeheartedly support the nature of this proposal, which is all about preserving deserved recognition and respecting people. My only suggestion is why stop at module owners. Can we find a way to recognize emeritus peers as well?

Re: proposed module: Emeritus Module Owners

2015-10-20 Thread Mitchell Baker
On 10/20/15 9:04 AM, Myk Melez wrote: Regarding the proposal itself, initially it seemed strange to collect emeritus owners into their own module, because it would dissociate them from the modules they formerly owned. I would have ex

Re: proposed module: Emeritus Module Owners

2015-10-20 Thread Mike Hoye
On 2015-10-20 12:04 PM, Myk Melez wrote: I would have expected the status to be an attribute on each module, much as some current owners/peers are marked "inactive" today. This touches on the only suggestion I had, that former owners and peers be able to mark themselves "active" or "inactive",

Re: proposed module: Emeritus Module Owners

2015-10-20 Thread Mitchell Baker
On 10/20/15 9:30 AM, Mike Hoye wrote: On 2015-10-20 12:04 PM, Myk Melez wrote: I would have expected the status to be an attribute on each module, much as some current owners/peers are marked "inactive" today. This touches on the only suggestion I had, that former owners and peers be able to

Re: proposed module: Emeritus Module Owners

2015-10-20 Thread Mitchell Baker
One other process I'm thinking we should implement is a discussion when a Module Owner leaves employment, esp leaving employment at Mozilla. At this discussion we would discuss things like: -- how they came to be module owner (were they involved as a volunteer? is their involvement all stemm

Re: proposed module: Emeritus Module Owners

2015-10-20 Thread Aaron Klotz
I like this a lot, but I'd also suggest that we expand this idea beyond merely just leaving employment to also encompass other changes in employment, such as managerial promotions. If one's employment status changes such that that person is no longer able to effectively serve as an owner/peer

Re: proposed module: Emeritus Module Owners

2015-10-20 Thread Jet Villegas
When a Module Owner is also a Mozilla employee who then leaves Mozilla, it seems prudent that their Module Ownership is relinquished. There are some Modules for which Ownership has to be a full Time job. Steven Michaud's recent departure seems like a good example of how to do that right. There hav

Re: proposed module: Emeritus Module Owners

2015-10-20 Thread Mike Hoye
On 2015-10-20 2:02 PM, Jet Villegas wrote: When a Module Owner is also a Mozilla employee who then leaves Mozilla, it seems prudent that their Module Ownership is relinquished. There are some Modules for which Ownership has to be a full Time job. I believe that this is a conversation for the modu

Re: proposed module: Emeritus Module Owners

2015-10-20 Thread Mitchell Baker
On 10/20/15 11:06 AM, Mike Hoye wrote: On 2015-10-20 2:02 PM, Jet Villegas wrote: When a Module Owner is also a Mozilla employee who then leaves Mozilla, it seems prudent that their Module Ownership is relinquished. There are some Modules for which Ownership has to be a full Time job. I believe