On 10/20/15 11:06 AM, Mike Hoye wrote:
On 2015-10-20 2:02 PM, Jet Villegas wrote:
When a Module Owner is also a Mozilla employee who then leaves
Mozilla, it
seems prudent that their Module Ownership is relinquished. There are some
Modules for which Ownership has to be a full Time job.
I believe that this is a conversation for the module owner and their
peers to have, and shouldn't forcibly be a condition of employment. I
really don't think we want to cross those streams.
- mhoye
this is why i suggest a discussion be required. it could be that the
Owner role in a particular module can be done effectively by someone no
longer an employee; it could be that it can't. so requiring a
discussion seems like a "best practice" to me.
And also I like the idea of coming back to this a set time later, say 4
weeks. This gives a bit of experience to the decision, and lets both
the no-longer-an-employee Owner and the rest of the module contributors
evaluate with that experience.
And I like your idea of Emeritus folks being able to self-identify as
active, so that their interest in contributing remains apparent.
mitchell
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
