On 2015-01-25 3:52 PM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
Ultimately, if someone is interested in knowing what a team is doing,
they should spend however much time they feel is necessary for them to
be kept abreast of a team. Whether that be following a team blog,
subscribing to a mailing list, watching A
Having read the entire discussion, Mike’s proposal seems most up to date to me
and I support it. I definitely would like to have static links and to have
public channels logged, I would also like bots to notify people when they join
a public channel that it is being logged. I think that’s alread
I'll keep it short, not to beat a dead horse:
I'm with the people having concerns about general public archiving of
all/most IRC channels because it takes semi-public chatter into the
indefinitely-archived-and-googleable world, which effectively kills
the medium as a watercooler equivalent (or, at
On 1/26/2015 12:48 PM, Larissa Shapiro wrote:
I would also like bots to notify people when they join a public channel
that it is being logged. I think that’s already happening in some places.
Please don't do this. There's already too many bots that send information to
users that they're really
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Patrick Cloke wrote:
> On 1/26/2015 12:48 PM, Larissa Shapiro wrote:
>>
>> I would also like bots to notify people when they join a public channel
>> that it is being logged. I think that’s already happening in some places.
>
>
> Please don't do this. There's alrea
Jumping on this late...
Putting aside the question of what logging is currently occurring, we want to
ensure that any logging that could occur as a matter of policy - and any data
collection, retention, and sharing generally - satisfies a specific, material
need and is limited to what is requir
The justification is that we are doing it wrong by defaulting to
closed decision making where not everyone can transparently see all
the discussions we have in the project.
Great post that talks about this discussion btw and the importance of open:
http://stormyscorner.com/2015/01/working-in-the-o
On 2015-01-26 10:30 PM, mer...@mozilla.com wrote:
Jumping on this late...
Putting aside the question of what logging is currently occurring, we want to
ensure that any logging that could occur as a matter of policy - and any data
collection, retention, and sharing generally - satisfies a speci
