On 11/05/14 23:23, Gabriele Svelto wrote:
> There's been no objections AFAIK. How should we move forward? We just
> edit the wiki to reflect Dave being the new module owner and me as a peer?
Yes :-) If a discussion here has concluded with an agreement, the wiki
should be edited. Ideally, by the cu
On 09/05/2014 03.21, Kyle Huey wrote:
This is a good move. Unless someone objected privately lets make it so.
- Kyle
There's been no objections AFAIK. How should we move forward? We just
edit the wiki to reflect Dave being the new module owner and me as a peer?
Gabriele
__
t to voice concerns/opposition publicly, so
> there's always module-owners...@mozilla.org as a backup avenue (that's the
> owner/peers of the Module Ownership module).
>
> -- Mike
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Hylands
> Sent: April 29, 2014 4:31 PM
&g
Hi Dave,
On 29/04/2014 22:31, Dave Hylands wrote:
> So I know Gregor asked me to be an owner, and I agreed (but never
> followed up on getting the wiki updated).
Good to hear that!
> I think that you would be an excellent co-owner/peer.
I'd be glad to help, and honored too!
Gabriele
signa
ckup avenue (that's the
owner/peers of the Module Ownership module).
-- Mike
-Original Message-
From: Dave Hylands
Sent: April 29, 2014 4:31 PM
To: Gabriele Svelto
Cc: governance@lists.mozilla.org
Subject: Re: Hal peers wanted
Hey Gabriele,
So I know Gregor asked me to be an owner
Hey Gabriele,
So I know Gregor asked me to be an owner, and I agreed (but never followed up
on getting the wiki updated).
I think that you would be an excellent co-owner/peer.
My understanding is that we basically discuss this stuff on this mailing list,
and then if there aren't any objecti
