No objections, so I've marked Input as deprecated.
Thanks!
- Mike Kelly
On 11/9/17 12:42 PM, Michael Kelly wrote:
> Input[1] was a service for collecting feedback about Mozilla products.
> It was decommissioned in January and replaced with a redirect to an
> externally-run survey s
Input[1] was a service for collecting feedback about Mozilla products.
It was decommissioned in January and replaced with a redirect to an
externally-run survey service.
I just noticed the module for Input[2] was still around, and plan on
marking it as deprecated since it's not really relevant any
Thanks for explaining. I understand the problem a lot better and think
those are reasonable changes. Thanks for clarifying!
- Mike Kelly
On 9/29/17 11:51 AM, Michele Warther via governance wrote:
> Thank you again for all the feedback and the additional people that have
> reached out to me direc
Hi!
Could you elaborate on why removing inactive subscribers is so
important? I'm a little confused by the statement "anyone’s inactivity
influences the delivery of all of our email programs".
Is it a cost issue of sending out so many emails? Or is it that we can't
properly measure the impact of
I think approving a module for Mozilla Communities Web Services would be
a great low-cost way to support the community sites that we're already
providing resources for. That this is just writing down a process that's
already happening is a good sign for it's viability, I think.
I also really l
Didn't see any objections, so I've made this change to the wiki. Congrats
giorgos!
- Mike Kelly
On 8/21/15 9:43 AM, Michael Kelly wrote:
Yo!
I'm currently module owner for the Snippet Service, but over the past
few months (after a team change) I've been directly involv
Yo!
I'm currently module owner for the Snippet Service, but over the past
few months (after a team change) I've been directly involved with the
codebase less and less. Giorgos Logiotatidis is the current active
maintainer and only peer, and he's been driving most of the work on
Snippets for a
Neat! A few questions:
- What's a position statement? I just don't know specifically what that term
means. :P
- When you say "a topic others may find challenging", do you mean difficult to
understand, or do you mean touchy/controversial?
- Just to clarify, does any of this apply to controvers
On 8/27/14, 9:50 AM, Bryan Clark wrote:
> I can try to answer these, the privacy notice isn't the best place to
have all these details and Geoff is planning to link to another page
that details answers to common questions.
The same answer was given to the question about this discussion in the
brow
On Wed Aug 27 11:00:58 2014, Gervase Markham wrote:
> Also, my understanding of Tiles was that it would be showcases for
> particular sites, rather than for particular products. So Mozilla would
> know (and therefore the government by subpoena could know) that ID
> 1234567 visited the New York Time
Looking at the other items on the Privacy Notice, I notice (heh) that
this lacks a very brief description of what tiles are and what they do,
which would go a long way towards making it clear what exact data we're
collecting and how often.
Also, here's some questions that aren't answered by the pr
On 5/21/14 12:58 PM, Matt Claypotch wrote:
> # Audience
>
> The Project Meeting will switch from a 100% public call to available for
> all Mozillians. The goal is to have as lightweight a barrier to viewing and
> participating in the meeting as possible. The official definition of the
> intended a
On 5/1/14 10:43 AM, Pascal Chevrel wrote:
> Was Piwik and other analytics solutions evaluated or was it just a
> direct decision to go to GA because we know it scales to our needs and
> everybody use it? If Piwik was evaluated and some features were missing,
> did we open bugs, communicate with P
Re-CCing Gareth so he can answer. :D
- Mike Kelly
On Thu May 1 09:49:29 2014, Florent Fayolle wrote:
> I am talking about this page:
> https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/29.0/whatsnew/?oldversion=28.0
>
> Each time a button is clicked on that page, a request is done:
> http://i.imgur.com/85Ws
I don't think he's on this mailing list, so I'm CCing Gareth Cull, who
is the Analytics Engineer for mozilla.org. He can answer any specific
questions about why a particular type of tracking was put on mozilla.org
(which may give insight into the greater purpose of this kind of analytics).
I'm not
On 4/30/14 11:46 AM, benoit.les...@gmail.com wrote:
> I've read the previous discussion again and I think we may want to revisit
> this decision, at least as a long-term goal.
>
> First, it was made two years ago when Mozilla wasn't so vocal about Privacy
> and User control as our core values. W
The issue of privacy vs. analytics is a complex one. There's a few
different questions that need to be answered to justify Mozilla's use
of Google Analytics. I'm just a lowly webdev who doesn't know too much
about official stances and tech, but here's my take:
First: Is it okay to track user ac
I don't assume this wasn't thought through (after an initial period of
"What?! Ads on newtab? Whaargrbl!", but that speaks to my lack of
vocabulary more than anything), but I am bothered by the fact that I
can't find any more info about this outside of the blog post. Thus, I'm
in the position t
18 matches
Mail list logo
