On 21/09/2017 01:08, Michele Warther wrote:
We’re doing this because all of our users could become impacted by a
> few subscribers inactivity. This happens because anyone’s inactivity
> influences the delivery of all of our email programs when it becomes
> frequent often - we want those who want
(x-post platform + governance + bmo, please followup-to governance)
Today I was asked for super-review. Although I've been around a while, I
am not a super-reviewer. I can't remember the last time before today
that I was asked (it's quite possibly: never). The person who asked me
was mostly ju
On 10/01/2017 02:30, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 1/9/17 5:52 PM, Emma Humphries wrote:
Yes, I posted about that last week to planet mozilla, and when we take
the
changes live, I'll talk about tagging at the Monday meeting. I could also
take that post and cc it to the usual mailing lists.
Please do
I don't think we have a concrete 100% worked-out *plan* at this point on
exactly how to remove all of XUL, but Benjamin said that there is a
*desire* to remove it. I can't speak for platform, but IME certainly
large portions of the Firefox frontend team do feel that way.
And realistically we *
On 03/12/2015 16:09, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
I'm just going to add that Mitchell's email while we u see stand what she
said I think the messaging could have been different. I'm unsure if PR was
consulted
Did you consult PR before you posted your response?
but the end result has been very nega
Interestingly, it seems that "Javascript Debugging backend" is still in
that page. It should have been removed when the code was removed (
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=800200 ).
Likewise there probably isn't much point in keeping Venkman either, as
it only ever supported that A
On 10/09/2015 00:42, Majken Connor wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 2:36 PM, R Kent James wrote:
On 9/9/2015 9:23 AM, Mike Hoye wrote:
"Any requirement that systems be designed or modified to enable
third-party access to encrypted data undermines user security. The goal
of computer security is
On 07/07/2015 06:44, B Galliart wrote:
I have a hard time believing people see the concerns as legitimate in a world where
"advocacy" is just marked hidden and disregarded.
I considered responding to this point earlier and didn't, because I
didn't want to fan the flames of this thread. Seeing
As a Mozilla engineer who worked on / reviewed some of the pocket and
reader mode stuff:
On 18/06/2015 07:44, Dan Stillman wrote:
- Is the plan actually to open this feature up with a documented API and
in a way that doesn't privilege a single proprietary service?
This is certainly what I've
On 09/06/2015 14:47, snafumatt...@gmail.com wrote:
Adblock plus and ublock origin are by far the most popular add-ons for Firefox.
Will you be implementing those by default, too?
Part of the effect of these add-ons (in terms of not being tracked and
pageload improvements) is currently (being)
On 09/06/2015 12:28, Irvin Chen wrote:
The list*1 had been inside Firefox for decades in
preference/content/language setting *2,
Languages and countries/regions are not the same thing. The list in the
preferences has language names, and only uses the regionNames list for
identifying distincti
Why is this a "good" list? This doesn't have an entry for Kosovo, nor
for South Sudan, nor for the most recent incarnation of the various
Netherlands Antilles (it still has "Netherlands Antilles" which is no
longer a nation state entity)
~ Gijs
On 09/06/2015 10:02, Irvin Chen wrote:
Just lea
On 13/05/2015 21:06, Fred Wenzel wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Majken Connor wrote:
It would be interesting to consider the option of including any and all
country codes and allowing the user to choose. That would also allow
Mozilla to say that it is the individual who is making the
ployee community members (which, again, is perhaps a reasonable goal,
but not the one you cited in support of asking for this).
If we're going to try to be more open, let's be more open, and not
half-closed still. :-)
~ Gijs
No IT/Ops makes sense much like sec bugs do.
On Apr 13, 201
re public too but for the
most part the ones I run into and have to be cc'ed on or ask about are
operational stuff but not something that demands company-confidential over
mozillians - confidential.
On Apr 13, 2015 5:25 AM, "Gijs Kruitbosch" wrote:
On 13/04/2015 05:46, Benjamin
On 13/04/2015 05:46, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
In the cases of things that truly need to be company-confidential then
those could still be marked but unless a strong justification could be
given for flagging company-confidential then
bugs that would ordinarily be made company-confidential would be
On 28/01/2015 20:00, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
On 28/01/2015 19:52, Fred Wenzel wrote:
* let's still figure out how to make "logged and googleable" obvious
to people in those channels
IMO /topic should have a link. If there is too much in there to do that,
assuming we centralize
On 28/01/2015 19:52, Fred Wenzel wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Gijs Kruitbosch
wrote:
So, strawman (which IMO is reasonable): can we check irc.m.o for
currently-public channels with 10 or more people in that are not currently
being publicly logged, which are clearly project/product
On 27/01/2015 19:11, Mike Hoye wrote:
On 2015-01-27 1:51 PM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Mike Hoye wrote:
I'd intended this request to be only for product- and project-related
channels, and even then to be opt-in. Blanket opt-out enrollment in
anything doesn't rea
Ehm, I'm pretty sure we will check for updates on release by default.
Less sure about FHR and crashreporter, but I was under the impression
both were opt-out.
Un Virumbi, naive question: would you really want to include the update
ping in disabling this? (ie no longer getting automated updates
On 25/11/2014 20:50, Adam Porter wrote:
If such a thing happened with Google or
Yahoo in [the USA], despite abuses by the NSA, et al, a warrant
would still be required at some level, and the accused would still
receive a public trial, with a right to counsel, chances to appeal,
the right to plead
On 05/08/2014 18:23, smar...@mozilla.com wrote:
On Monday, August 4, 2014 6:47:19 AM UTC-7, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
On 22/07/2014 11:22, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
On 19/07/2014 00:33, Alina Hua wrote:
REAL CHOICES (removed)
Previous: Educate users whenever we collect any personal
On 22/07/2014 11:22, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
On 19/07/2014 00:33, Alina Hua wrote:
REAL CHOICES (removed)
Previous: Educate users whenever we collect any personal information
and give them a choice whenever possible.
Context: Eliminated based on feedback that the difference between
choice and
Thanks for this excellent update!
There's one more thing that irks me here:
On 23/07/2014 13:36, ddi...@mozilla.com wrote:
Being a volunteer at Mozilla means you freely donate your time, ideas,
heartbeats, etc. to help us accomplish our mission.
> You agree that you are here because you are
On 19/07/2014 00:33, Alina Hua wrote:
REAL CHOICES (removed)
Previous: Educate users whenever we collect any personal information and give
them a choice whenever possible.
Context: Eliminated based on feedback that the difference between choice and
control wasn't clear, and that the conversatio
On 10/07/2014 23:01, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
I recently learned that not all Employees and Contractors are even
required to sign NDA's as we often discuss trust around contributors
it seems odd that contributors would be held to a higher standard then
employees, contractors and interns.
I obvi
On 15/05/2014 14:01, Jim wrote:
On 2014-05-15 11:38, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Rubén Martín
wrote:
* It's not the first time we take decisions because everyone else is
doing it, and we want to keep being relevant.
o This worries me the most looking at t
On 14/05/2014 20:47, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Gijs Kruitbosch
wrote:
There was a town hall about this earlier today. Did the invite not reach
you? A lot of this was already discussed.
I only received an email from Brian King ~3h ago, via Reps-General.
IIRC
On 14/05/2014 19:10, Rubén Martín wrote:
Hi,
I've just found these two articles with the announcement:
https://hacks.mozilla.org/2014/05/reconciling-mozillas-mission-and-w3c-eme/
https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2014/05/14/drm-and-the-challenge-of-serving-users/
And since I can't find where the d
On 01/05/2014 15:43, Pascal Chevrel wrote:
Looking at the Piwik site, it seems some big companies like T-Mobile use
it, I know the volume we have on mozilla.org so maybe Piwik doesn't
scale *yet* to out needs, but this is an open source project and as
such, fixable, and that doesn't mean that we
Will there be individual peers as well? You named stakeholder teams, but
as David said, no individuals there, either. :-)
~ Gijs
On 14/04/2014 16:47, Geoffrey MacDougall wrote:
Sorry; to clarify: I would be the owner in my capacity with the Foundation.
G.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:43 AM, L.
On 09/04/2014 23:55, Jim Taylor wrote:
Mitchell's 'Brendan Eich Steps Down as Mozilla CEO' is ambiguous. Some people
defending the treatment of Brendan and Mozilla claim it is being
mis-interpreted by many in the media. This post has been up for a week now.
It appears that clarifications h
On 27/03/2014 01:21, bret...@gmail.com wrote:
1. Though I haven't played around with it yet, from what I understand of
Australis, one will have to make an extra click to get to one's add-ons. An
extra click to get to add-ons is like a kiss of death to me even and I would
hope this feeling coul
Indeed. Could we get them to do a 1-3 minute standup/what's-new-in... in
the project meeting? Maybe not necessarily every meeting, but maybe a
shared slot where we get an update every so often? I would love to keep
hearing about what's happening with Persona and Thunderbird. Regular
planet post
On 12/02/2014 10:11, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
As Bryan Clark put it on Twitter,
> The "Mozilla ads" inside Firefox is actually taking us from
> http://cl.ly/image/033X3C3R1m3f to http://cl.ly/image/3I172o2f202k
> for first run
https://twitter.com/clarkbw/status/4306
On 12/02/2014 07:42, Jim Porter wrote:
On 02/11/2014 07:26 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
regarding
https://blog.mozilla.org/advancingcontent/2014/02/11/publisher-transformation-with-users-at-the-center/
:
Directory Tiles will instead suggest pre-packaged content for
first-time users. Some of the
On 11/12/13, 14:07 , Andi Ye wrote:
Mozilla is currently appealing for donations on its Google homepage, even though we see
that it had a net income (what commercial companies would call "Net Profit") of
US$21.6 million in 2011 (source: Wikipedia).
How is whether all of the income of a non-pr
On 04/12/13, 09:06 , Li Gong wrote:
The point is that we do redirect the user's link for some affiliate program in
Firefox China build, as you said 'our BD team did go overly aggressive in this
particular case.'
That was a mistake, and once discovered, has been corrected. There were some
lap
On 30/09/13 20:44 , Smartin wrote:
Here is Carmen's response:
Hi Stacy,
1) We'd love to have the Manifesto localized
2) Yes, Michaela is point on. The localizers usually make suggestions on what
makes sense. That said, we only deal officially with ES and PT on the Twitter
front. We don't hav
Thanks for encouraging a discussion about this! I think the general
structure of the text is great. Being a nitpicky person, I have some
nitty remarks, generally trying to make the phrasing simpler, less
technical and easier to understand (which is a little difficult because
it's a technical fe
On 16/04/13 13:17 , Rubén Martín wrote:
El 16/04/13 21:54, to...@mozilla-uk.org escribió:
Hello,
I'm starting this discussion because I found out that the following
has happened:
An Etherpad about "needed apps for Firefox OS" was shared amongst all
of Reps (URL [1]).
It was soon protected with
On 05/04/13 12:26 , Till Schneidereit wrote:
Therefore, I think this is a symptom of the problem that we are not
teaching new employees about the culture, values and methods of working
of the Mozilla community nearly as well as we should. There continues to
be a significant need for an onboarding
On 21/01/2013 22:31 PM, David Ascher wrote:
we know that bad guys will fork Firefox and turn it into malware, and that
copyright is a better tool for reigning them in than licensing law
Did you mean to say "trademarks"? Or did I miss something WRT copyright helping
us fight against malware f
On 19/09/2012 09:31 AM, David Bruant wrote:
Le 18/09/2012 19:00, John Jensen a écrit :
Hi David,
The hiring process, for various reasons
cannot be considered as a meritocracy
Could you expand on that a bit?
In answers by other people, it's been answered, but here are some elements:
First, Mo
44 matches
Mail list logo
