It’s definitely a problematic situation and I think it demonstrates how Mozilla
is drifting more and more from its manifesto and values towards a more
corporate and closed community. Mozilla embraces more closed practices today
than it did just a few years ago.
And it’s surely not benefitting t
Injecting addons whether enabled or disabled into a set of users based on
their geographic location is a privacy issue.
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 8:29 AM Boris Zbarsky via governance <
governance@lists.mozilla.org> wrote:
> On 12/16/17 4:09 PM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
> > Yes this is a privacy and
This isn’t really a governance issue although governance does get
improperly used for complaints like this often.
Yes this is a privacy and ethical issue and it appears to go against the
Mozilla manifesto and it’s unlikely Chrome Team would ever make such a
mistake. It was disappointing to see Jas
The appropriate process would have been for Brendan to propose a successor
here like all other modules my guess since he is now gone that Mitchell
would be the next appropriate person to propose a replacement here.
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:58 AM, glob via governance <
governance@lists.mozilla.or
You did not actually answer anyone’s questions
and taking this off list to privately reach out versus publicly answering
these valid questions is contrary to the working in the open that Mozilla
strives for.
Please address these questions here and work in the open.
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 9:44 AM
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 3:12 PM, zbraniecki--- via governance <
governance@lists.mozilla.org> wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 22, 2017 at 12:54:55 PM UTC-7, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
>
> > > Should we be worried about bundling our software with software that
> uses this license?
> > Is the worry that Mozil
This would be a legal team question not likely governance
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 9:38 AM, zbraniecki--- via governance <
governance@lists.mozilla.org> wrote:
> We're currently using React in multiple projects including Test Pilot
> extensions and DevTools.
>
> It came to light that React license
+1 for these proposed changes
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Mike Connor wrote:
> (please direct followups to dev-planning, cross-posting to governance,
> firefox-dev, dev-platform)
>
>
> Nearly 19 years after the creation of the Mozilla Project, commit access
> remains essentially the same as
That module wiki is outdated Brendan is not involved in the project. I'm
not shutting down this discussion I'm just letting you know you have
exhausted your options.
I've been around long enough to see many emails like yours and see them go
nowhere.
If you haven't got a positive response from the
That's not how things work and no Brendan hasnt been involved in the
project for years.
Mozilla's Board of Directors don't get involved in bugs and I can tell you
that your not going to get any escalation by emailing here.
Module owner has the final say and you've indicated you already went that
There is no escalation if the module owner and decision makers in the bug
have made a decision.
It appears you've exhausted your options.
On Feb 23, 2017 1:23 PM, "Douglas Crosher via governance" <
governance@lists.mozilla.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to bring the following review decision
11 matches
Mail list logo
