On Sunday, June 14, 2015 at 7:33:51 PM UTC-5, Angly Cat wrote:
> On Monday, June 15, 2015 at 6:25:54 AM UTC+6, B Galliart wrote:
> > contributors will have to reverse engineer from the code what the new
> > private calls do.
>
> I just want to point that according to the Pocket(tm) Terms of Servi
On Monday, June 15, 2015 at 6:25:54 AM UTC+6, B Galliart wrote:
> contributors will have to reverse engineer from the code what the new private
> calls do.
I just want to point that according to the Pocket(tm) Terms of Service[1]:
> LICENSE RESTRICTIONS
>
> Your access to and use of the Pocket T
On Sunday, June 14, 2015 at 5:31:06 AM UTC-5, Angly Cat wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 at 11:11:39 PM UTC+6, Gervase Markham wrote:
> > The API Firefox uses is documented in the Firefox codebase:
> >
> > https://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/components/pocket/pktApi.js
> >
I completely agree with this statement and most of the replies on this list.
Pocket is a surprising and unwanted addition. I believe that the masses would
not care for this feature. Some may be tricked into using it, thinking it is a
Mozilla service and follows its guidelines (and is free).
I f
On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 at 11:11:39 PM UTC+6, Gervase Markham wrote:
> The API Firefox uses is documented in the Firefox codebase:
>
> https://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/components/pocket/pktApi.js
>
> It's not a particularly complicated API AFAICS.
>
> Gerv
I wonder whi
Hi againĀ
It's Soyeon from Whova. I sent you an email about your upcoming event, Mozilla Weekend Berlin. I know you must be very busy and might have missed the email.
I wanted to reach out and see what event organizing challenges you were facing (busy with trivial deta
On Friday, 12 June 2015 23:24:55 UTC+2, Robert Kaiser wrote:
> john99.s...@gmail.com schrieb:
> > I understand this is still available for locales, or Firefox builds I
> > should say, that do not integrate Pocket.
>
> From what I know, that's not true. The functionality that we did test
> in b
I switched back to FireFox (from Chrome) due to privacy concerns (with Google).
Since Mozilla has now abandoned any pretense of caring about end-user privacy,
is there some other alternative, privacy-preserving browser (esp. for Linux)?
This betrayal by Mozilla is heart-breaking. I never tho
I feel you mate/it could hang and other parts may not sync right without it/so
not cool since the fox had us spoiled/compared to the rest.fox invent a better
way on the next update thanksš£
___
governance mailing list
governance@lists.mozilla.org
https:/
