Im surprised it didnt just tell you to use React. =)
On Friday, April 18, 2025 at 10:47:18 AM UTC-5 Tim Macpherson wrote:
> JSNI is probably easier than jsinterop in the bootstrap example ? no js
> file to create and load, no annotations, but
> 1) bit fiddly calling JSNI methods from js,
> 2) d
There’s also the GwtBootstrap3 library that’s open source (and has its own
similar demo app). Wonder if the AI had that in its training material …
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 at 19:15, 'Tim Macpherson' via GWT Users <
google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Why did it use JSNI ? it's a bit young fo
All those AI tools give/prefer JSNI code over JsInterop.
For example yesterday I was looking for using SVG in GWT. And Gemini told
me I could for example wrap svg.js in a gwt wrapper. And explicitty told me
that JSNI was a better option then JSinterop with some reasons. It showed
examples of bo
JSNI is probably easier than jsinterop in the bootstrap example ? no js file to
create and load, no annotations, but
1) bit fiddly calling JSNI methods from js,
2) doesn't do non-native exports ?
Yahoo Mail: Search, Organize, Conquer
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 8:31 AM, Frank wrote:
All thos
Looking for a new job?
https://vibecodefixers.com
Frank schrieb am Fr. 18. Apr. 2025 um 09:31:
> All those AI tools give/prefer JSNI code over JsInterop.
>
> For example yesterday I was looking for using SVG in GWT. And Gemini told
> me I could for example wrap svg.js in a gwt wrapper. And exp
