Im surprised it didnt just tell you to use React. =)

On Friday, April 18, 2025 at 10:47:18 AM UTC-5 Tim Macpherson wrote:

> JSNI is probably easier than jsinterop in the bootstrap example ? no js 
> file to create and load, no annotations, but 
> 1) bit fiddly calling JSNI methods from js,
> 2) doesn't do non-native exports ?
>
> Yahoo Mail: Search, Organize, Conquer 
> <https://mail.onelink.me/107872968?pid=nativeplacement&c=US_Acquisition_YMktg_315_SearchOrgConquer_EmailSignature&af_sub1=Acquisition&af_sub2=US_YMktg&af_sub3=&af_sub4=100002039&af_sub5=C01_Email_Static_&af_ios_store_cpp=0c38e4b0-a27e-40f9-a211-f4e2de32ab91&af_android_url=https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.yahoo.mobile.client.android.mail&listing=search_organize_conquer>
>
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 8:31 AM, Frank
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> All those AI tools give/prefer JSNI code over JsInterop.
>
> For example yesterday I was looking for using SVG in GWT. And Gemini told 
> me I could for example wrap svg.js in a gwt wrapper. And explicitty told me 
> that JSNI was a better option then JSinterop with some reasons. It showed 
> examples of both but recommended going with JSNI.
>
> In the past I also have seen it multiple times that Gemini and Copilot 
> tell me to use JSNI.
>
>
> (personnally I actually also find JSNI to be a better solution, but I 
> don't use it anymore because of the promise of GWT 3 (?...?))
>
> Op donderdag 17 april 2025 om 23:48:45 UTC+2 schreef bryan:
>
> I specifically told Grok I didn't want to use GWTBootstrap3 as I wanted 
> the latest Bootstrap and wanted to minimise dependencies.
> On Friday, April 18, 2025 at 7:18:02 AM UTC+10 Carl Stainton wrote:
>
> There’s also the GwtBootstrap3 library that’s open source (and has its own 
> similar demo app). Wonder if the AI had that in its training material …
>
> On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 at 19:15, 'Tim Macpherson' via GWT Users <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> Why did it use JSNI ? it's a bit young for that
>
> Yahoo Mail: Search, Organize, Conquer 
> <https://mail.onelink.me/107872968?pid=nativeplacement&c=US_Acquisition_YMktg_315_SearchOrgConquer_EmailSignature&af_sub1=Acquisition&af_sub2=US_YMktg&af_sub3=&af_sub4=100002039&af_sub5=C01_Email_Static_&af_ios_store_cpp=0c38e4b0-a27e-40f9-a211-f4e2de32ab91&af_android_url=https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.yahoo.mobile.client.android.mail&listing=search_organize_conquer>
>
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 12:27 AM, Craig Mitchell
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> Very cool.  Impressive it didn't cheat and actually coded it with GWT UI 
> Binder and JSNI.
>
> On Wednesday, 16 April 2025 at 5:40:55 pm UTC+10 bryan wrote:
>
> If anyone is interested, I created a GWT test app styled with Bootstrap. 
> The code is almost entirely written by Grok (99%). Quite amazing what AI 
> can do!
>
> -- 
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "GWT Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion visit 
>
>
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/3abd7770-8303-457d-933f-7e72add74c32n%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/3abd7770-8303-457d-933f-7e72add74c32n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/b807c993-214d-4df2-b904-b0b9c5f77da5n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to