On Fri, 10 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I suggest the TPR events be held every two months.
> The off-month can be spent on many things: analysis of
> previous games, Games::Golf module, writing quality Golf
> articles for TPR (it's impossible to write a sensible
> analysis of a golf tourna
> You realize, I suppose, that what you are suggesting is
> basically
> playing 'limbo golf'? :)
Perl Limbo, hm? I thought Larry was in charge of all the religious references.
> I like the idea, but I think that having more than a
> tournament a
> month is a little bit of an over
`/anick writes:
> just my $0.02, # ah AH! this is valid perl
% perl -le 'just my $0.02'
syntax error at -e line 1, near "just my "
Execution of -e aborted due to compilation errors.
:)
/-\|_/-\
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 10:36:47AM -0400, Karger, Amir wrote:
> OK, this idea came to me as I was going to sleep at the end of a week containing a
>golf contest, so it might be horrible, but it's at least interesting.
>
You realize, I suppose, that what you are suggesting is basically
p
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 09:44:10AM -0400, Karger, Amir wrote:
> As an earthling, I've got only four eyes, [..]
I have to say, the Venusian Intelligence Corp. is
not forming its agents like it used to...
Joy,
`/anick
--
Never ruin an apology with an excuse.
-- Kimber
Amir Karger writes:
> Yet another interesting aspect of this is that it would
> foster the maximum number of algorithms without regard for
> length -- gradually evolution would allow the most
> shortenable solutions to survive. (For the physicists and
> computational chemists and biologists
> >
> >I think we will run into a problem finding holes earlier than that.
> >Refereeing is fun, and I don't really think there will be a problem
> >finding new ones.
>
> Yes, coming up with quality holes is definitely more challenging
> than coming up with enough referees. For instance, we al
OK, this idea came to me as I was going to sleep at the end of a week containing a
golf contest, so it might be horrible, but it's at least interesting.
If people still want to do monthly contests, this could be an a way of passing the
time during the other three weeks (um, once you're out of p
Stefan `Sec` Zehl wrote:
>On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 08:56:48AM -0500, Chris Dolan wrote:
>> If we do start to see decrease in participation, or great difficulty
>> finding referees (I think the latter is far more likely) then
we should
>> talk about changing the frequency, but not until then, I sug
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 08:56:48AM -0500, Chris Dolan wrote:
> If we do start to see decrease in participation, or great difficulty
> finding referees (I think the latter is far more likely) then we should
> talk about changing the frequency, but not until then, I suggest.
I think we will run int
Karger, Amir wrote:
>
> I have to agree with Andrew here.
>
> As an earthling, I've got only four eyes, and having one explode each month means
>I'm going to run out of eyes soon. Two months might give me some recuperating time.
>
> Part of this is due to personal weakness: I don't think I cou
[Sorry I'm not quoting the actual letter. I just read the web maillist archive.]
I have to agree with Andrew here.
As an earthling, I've got only four eyes, and having one explode each month means I'm
going to run out of eyes soon. Two months might give me some recuperating time.
Part of this
Dave Hoover wrote:
> Andrew wrote:
>
>>At the risk of being called a SPOILER, I feel the
>>current tournament schedule is not sustainable in
>>the long term. It is putting too much strain on too
>>many people (who I happen to like :) and I don't
>>want to see any more people rushed to hospital wi
Andrew wrote:
> At the risk of being called a SPOILER, I feel the
> current tournament schedule is not sustainable in
> the long term. It is putting too much strain on too
> many people (who I happen to like :) and I don't
> want to see any more people rushed to hospital with
> golf-related illnes
14 matches
Mail list logo
