Re: [go-nuts] Temporary files in go

2018-10-16 Thread Manuel Amador (Rudd-O)
On 12/10/2018 12.35, Robert Engels wrote: > Which is not Windows, which is giving up a lot of options, and is important > to some people, where as just using tmp files is ok. I am not even sure if > windows supports deleting an open file yet. I believe the default behavior is no it does not. --

Re: [go-nuts] How to retain environment in SSH

2019-03-11 Thread Manuel Amador (Rudd-O)
I can think of one thing which may be the case: If you SSH via the terminal, some bashrc/bashprofile thingie might run on the server that would not otherwise run in batch mode (noninteractively, which is what your Go code is likely doing). Try this: ssh -o "BatchMode yes" host sh -c 'echo $VARIA

[go-nuts] [ANN] curvetls:

2016-09-26 Thread Manuel Amador (Rudd-O)
Hello, Gophers! I am announcing the first iteration of curvetls: a Go library that provides a robust framing and encryption layer for your Go programs, striving to be secure, strict, and simple. With curvetls, it's dead easy to go from raw sockets to secure channels, based on CurveCP (NaCL) encry

Re: [go-nuts] Golang smtp package support for CC and BCC

2016-09-26 Thread Manuel Amador (Rudd-O)
On 09/26/2016 07:06 AM, Asit Dhal wrote: > Hi, > I don't see any functions in Golang net/smtp package for CC and BCC. > Does it support those functionalities ? > If not, is there any work around for that ? My RFC2822 knowledge is very rusty, but isn't that just a function of the MIME headers you

Re: [go-nuts] Re: Stalking people online for thought crimes! This is what the Go project has succumbed to!

2016-10-28 Thread Manuel Amador (Rudd-O)
On 10/28/2016 03:56 AM, prades.m...@gmail.com wrote: > Sure you willfully participate on a forum often used for insults, > character assassination, witch hunts and doxxing. This isn't the first > time shit like this happens on /r/golang , and frankly it gives the > whole Go community a bad name. Ke

Re: [go-nuts] Re: Stalking people online for thought crimes! This is what the Go project has succumbed to!

2016-10-28 Thread Manuel Amador (Rudd-O)
On 10/27/2016 02:29 PM, Jordan Krage wrote: > At the very least, this kind of CoC 'enforcement' should be entirely > public and transparent. How are others supposed to learn what is > considered a violation, when violators are only contacted privately by > email? The point of a CoC is to police p

Re: [go-nuts] Re: Stalking people online for thought crimes! This is what the Go project has succumbed to!

2016-10-28 Thread Manuel Amador (Rudd-O)
On 10/27/2016 03:33 PM, charras...@gmail.com wrote: > code of conduct workers should work on adding generics to compilers True. But, consider this: if they /could/ accomplish that feat, then they wouldn't be wasting time policing people's thoughts and "propriety". What have thought puritans ever