hi,
wonder, if anyone,
- tried to make an implementation of template that works in // ?
- was it successful ?
- useful for perf ?
thanks
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails fr
obviously not,
go func t.Exec...
go func t.Exec...
but
`
{{slowcall}}
{{fastcall}}
{{slowcall}}
{{$y := CanNot//}}
`
ect
On Tuesday, May 30, 2017 at 10:09:35 AM UTC+2, mhh...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> wonder, if anyone,
> - tried to make an implementation of template that works in // ?
> - w
I'm not aware of any templating languages that provide concurrent or
parallel constructions.
If you need parallel execution of those function calls, I would run the
calls as part of my Go code and then pass the results to the template.
On Tuesday, May 30, 2017 at 10:44:21 AM UTC+2, mhh...@gmail
thanks for feedback.
> If you need parallel execution of those function calls, I would run the
calls as part of my Go code and then pass the results to the template.
This is not really //.
You are still waiting for the input to exist before you even start the
template processing.
If you put t
Hi, I'm afraid I just followed the elastic search reference docs. I don't
know if any tutorials
Phil
On Tue, 30 May 2017, 04:52 , wrote:
> Hello Philip,
> I searched quite a lot for any tutorials on how to write directly to the
> http API but couldn't find tutorials or pointers on how to do tha
I m just gonna add more examples as it come,
from
hasPrefix := func(prefix string) func(string) bool {
return func(s string) bool { return strings.HasPrefix(s,
prefix) }
} // this is not cool
if fnUtils.AllTypes().Filter(hasPrefix("post")).
Thank you Rajanikanth, Kevin and Egon! I will explore the ideas you guys
provided and keep you updated.
Best Regards,
Chun
On Sunday, May 28, 2017 at 2:25:03 AM UTC-4, Egon wrote:
>
>
>
> On Saturday, 27 May 2017 14:05:11 UTC+3, Chun Zhang wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Kevin and Egon!
>>
>> With a few e
I just realized what d be awesome is that the language
does not only provide boiler plate []basicType enhanced types,
but provides streamed version of them,
that d be much better.
when you do
[15Million]string.map().filter().count().
with a naive implementation over array of those intents,
you
I read this post by Jaana
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GFHAksL5HQy1YacCFXMUdOTC4e21uoX-TbMzRXAtx_I/preview
I wanted to start a conversation about the Context value bag and TraceIDs.
I am concerned with the idea of using the Context to pass TraceIDs into the
API of packages that don't dire
After reading this:
https://cloudplatform.googleblog.com/2017/04/distributed-tracing-for-Go.html
I can see how the Context is being used, through a separate API. Would it
make sense to use a separate Context value for the "Trace" Context and use
a separate Context value for the "Cancellation" C
This might be an unpopular opinion, but you don't *need* an ES client. ES is
just JSON over HTTP with a very well documented REST-ful API.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
We rolled our own, not hiding the fact that it's just JSON over HTTP.
https://godoc.org/gopkg.in/juju/charmstore.v5-unstable/elasticsearch
On 30 May 2017 at 16:44, DV wrote:
> This might be an unpopular opinion, but you don't *need* an ES client. ES is
> just JSON over HTTP with a very well docu
one more case where conv d be awesome,
with
fnUtils.InputParams() ParamSlice
Where
ParamSlice []struct{Name,Type string}
With little help, I can do stuff like
ctxFilter := astutil.FilterParamSlice.ByType(ctxCtx)
fnUtils.InputParams().Filter(ctxFilter).Map(func(p
astu
One was last updated in 2015, the other in 2013. Am I missing more than my
usual clue?
Leam
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr
On Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 4:06:25 PM UTC+2, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 2:01 AM, > wrote:
> >
> > Generational and Compact gc have already been thought best practice. But
> > golang doesn't adopt it. Who can tell me the reason?
>
> Now let's consider a generational GC
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Jan Ziak <0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 4:06:25 PM UTC+2, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 2:01 AM, wrote:
>> >
>> > Generational and Compact gc have already been thought best practice. But
>> > golang doesn't
Hi guys, I recently finished my first complex Vulkan API example in Go: A
SPINNING CUBE.
https://github.com/vulkan-go/demos/tree/master/vulkancube
It actually took me three attempts to do that, meanwhile I was improving
the Vulkan API bindings project, you can see the project history timeline
17 matches
Mail list logo