First, let me apologize for writing in a way that you took to be
aggressive. That was definitely not my intention. My state of mind
when I wrote it was conversational, not antagonistic, and I did not
realize you would interpret it any other way.
* gera...@cloudoki.com [191018 11:08]:
> hey, Mar
hey, Marvin,
Actually I haven't noticed it was a 8 year old thread, neither had I
noticed that there should be any kind of preface in such cases (well, it
was just a comment and the group rules are not that clear, afterall). My
comment was about a rather *usual feature in OOP languages and that
* gera...@cloudoki.com [191016 11:03]:
> I'm not sure about its *idiomacity*, but namespacing should be a nice thing.
>
> On Tuesday, March 1, 2011 at 8:48:52 PM UTC, yiyus wrote:
Do you realize you are responding to an eight-year-old thread? If you
really feel a nee
I'm not sure about its *idiomacity*, but namespacing should be a nice thing.
On Tuesday, March 1, 2011 at 8:48:52 PM UTC, yiyus wrote:
>
> 2011/3/1 Nihlus >:
> > some_fun() would be implemented as an ordinary method
> > for the type (with the value of the receiver simply discarded)
>
> Why having
