I'm not sure about its *idiomacity*, but namespacing should be a nice thing.
On Tuesday, March 1, 2011 at 8:48:52 PM UTC, yiyus wrote: > > 2011/3/1 Nihlus <ho...@valentimex.com <javascript:>>: > > some_fun() would be implemented as an ordinary method > > for the type (with the value of the receiver simply discarded) > > Why having a receiver if you are going to discard it? What would be > the advantage of using a T.New() method instead of a NewT() function? > > -- > - yiyus || JGL . > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/1294bfdb-4761-4e7f-9137-20a4c520aded%40googlegroups.com.
