Re: [go-nuts] Re: Go - language of the future!

2017-03-19 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Sat, 18 Mar 2017 05:31:20 -0700 (PDT) mhhc...@gmail.com wrote: [...] > For those which are language designers, comparing the language to > such things > like haskell is made in an attempt to make the best language design > (small ego trip here ?), > not the most practical, effective IRL languag

Re: [go-nuts] Re: Go - language of the future!

2017-03-18 Thread mhhcbon
wait. We should speak the same kind of comparisons. if we do a comparison to languages like haskell, idris, coq i m not sure we are targeting the hearth of the industry. They do not represent solarge% of code written code everyday that GO is made to replace. My understanding is that go would like

Re: [go-nuts] Re: Go - language of the future!

2017-03-16 Thread Jesper Louis Andersen
I think this is too premature to make this call. Javascript is a language with no type system and it is relying a lot on runtime behavior. Yet, it was a "language of the future" when it was created and I don't think it was envisioned to become as big as it got. Attempts are replacing it are going s

[go-nuts] Re: Go - language of the future!

2017-03-16 Thread prades . marq
A language with such a "simple" type system, which rely that much on runtime behavior is hardly a language of the future. But Go might be a blue print for what language of the futures will have to provide in terms of developer experience. Go is too divisive to get widely adopted or to replace a

[go-nuts] Re: Go - language of the future!

2017-03-16 Thread mhhcbon
Did not need such analysis to claim such assertion, A language that does not bloat its users with semi colon (one for you https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/golang-nuts/rzLzp_Z74ik%5B1-25%5D), parenthesis where useless, with automatic formatting, tries to solve "les querelles de clocher",