A language with such a "simple" type system, which rely that much on runtime behavior is hardly a language of the future. But Go might be a blue print for what language of the futures will have to provide in terms of developer experience. Go is too divisive to get widely adopted or to replace any "enterprise" language.
Le jeudi 16 mars 2017 20:27:24 UTC+1, mhh...@gmail.com a écrit : > > Did not need such analysis to claim such assertion, > A language that does not bloat its users with semi colon (one for you > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/golang-nuts/rzLzp_Z74ik%5B1-25%5D), > > parenthesis where useless, > with automatic formatting, > tries to solve "les querelles de clocher", > is cross compiling by default > ect ect ect ect (we could add 100 more like this) > > definitely is a language of the future. > > I feel so bad returning to older languages. > > Simply said, GO ROCKS > > On Thursday, March 16, 2017 at 3:14:15 PM UTC+1, Art Mellor wrote: >> >> Interesting/fun article where Erik Bernhardsson analyzes data about >> moving from one programming language to another >> >> https://erikbern.com/2017/03/15/the-eigenvector-of-why-we-moved-from-language-x-to-language-y.html >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
