On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 11:13 AM medienwer...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
> re : "However, I don't understand how to make
> that work in practice. "
>
> from my research so far I found tons of Github Actions related to
> "Projects"...
>
> just some examples:
> https://github.com/marketplace/actions/all-i
Dear Ian
re : "However, I don't understand how to make
that work in practice. "
from my research so far I found tons of Github Actions related to
"Projects"...
just some examples:
https://github.com/marketplace/actions/all-in-one-project
https://github.com/marketplace/actions/assign-to-one-p
Not having a GitHub account is a non-issue.
- It is an issue now because the enhancement process is on GitHub issues
which does not include voting or weighting of votes.
It is a trivial matter to use gohugo.io with a package that integrates
GitHub issues as the repository for comments.
---
Hi,
ISTM that all those filtering-suggestions are quietly redefining the
problem. The Go team didn't say "we don't have time to read all proposals",
they said "we don't have time to argue every proposal in-depth". So if your
concern was "that is bad, because I want all proposals to get enough
atte
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 1:00 PM Markus Heukelom
wrote:
>
> Would it be an idea to allow people only to label something as proposal if
> they have at least some support / voucher for the idea? Say N>10 general
> upvotes or 1 upvote from a golang committer?
The problem is that not everyone has a
I really like Markus Heukelon's suggestion.
There is no need for the Go team to evaluate each proposal, that is a silly
waste of a valuable and limited resource.
Having a list of all proposals with voting means that the most popular
items float to the top and the worst float to the bottom and newb
Would it be an idea to allow people only to label something as proposal if
they have at least some support / voucher for the idea? Say N>10 general
upvotes or 1 upvote from a golang committer?
By allowing the "proposal" label, you sort of give people the idea that
their idea will be "triaged",
I had forgotten about the multidimensional slices proposal. That's a very
good counter-example.
On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 4:12 AM Ian Davis wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Jul 2020, at 2:08 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 12:19 AM Tyler Compton
> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm beginning to th
On Sun, 19 Jul 2020, at 2:08 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 12:19 AM Tyler Compton wrote:
> >
> > I'm beginning to think that community members (like myself) can't
> > reasonably be expected to put in the necessary effort to champion a sizable
> > language change. I think
On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 12:19 AM Tyler Compton wrote:
>
> I'm beginning to think that community members (like myself) can't reasonably
> be expected to put in the necessary effort to champion a sizable language
> change. I think it was Ian who made multiple generics draft proposals just to
> re
While I have over 50 years of programming experience, I am also quite old
and sometimes have senile moments.
I once wrote an extremely well-written bug report complaining about the use
of the backtick which is not on my keyboard, explained why it should not be
used, and then presented a workaro
> On Jul 16, 2020, at 3:35 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> The language is stable and is not looking to change in any
> significant way (except perhaps for adding generics). We've realized
> that we need to be upfront about that.
The Go2 process certainly created the expectation that the la
There seems to be an assumption that, given enough time and effort, any
idea could get accepted into the language. But that clearly can't be so. It
might be frustrating to hear that your particular idea just isn't
considered a good idea, but it's a necessity that most ideas go that route.
It's not
I have a proposal for improving Go proposal procedure.
It stems from two "issues" highlighted in several occasions:
1. core Go team is spending an increasing amount of time discussing a
larger number of proposals.
All of them are commented and discussed by core Go team, and in the end
I'm beginning to think that community members (like myself) can't
reasonably be expected to put in the necessary effort to champion a sizable
language change. I think it was Ian who made multiple generics draft
proposals just to reject them himself, then Ian and Robert Griesemer spent
more untold h
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 10:20 AM medienwer...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
> With your considerations in mind I suggest a well defined triage
> mode/"traffic light" - system for processing language feature proposals.
>
> When your/the teams bias is clear, the indication shows the proposer/the
> community
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 5:40 AM giuliom...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
> I believe this is an important part of the community, without such process,
> we would not get new smart ideas for Go. I don't know exactly the rejection
> rate, but even if it was 1 accepted idea out of 100, all of them must be
>
Dear Ian
With your considerations in mind I suggest a well defined triage
mode/"traffic light" - system for processing language feature proposals.
When your/the teams bias is clear, the indication shows the proposer/the
community feasible and/or practicable "next steps".
Also a collection of
I believe this is an important part of the community, without such process,
we would not get new smart ideas for Go. I don't know exactly the rejection
rate, but even if it was 1 accepted idea out of 100, all of them must be
reviewed in order to spot the right one.
On the other hand, I unders
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 1:32 PM Brandon Bennett wrote:
>
> I have just read
> https://github.com/golang/go/issues/33892#issuecomment-659618902 and since it
> was posted on a closed issue I wanted to comment a bit more.
>
> I subscribed to this issue and read the updates for both the Go2 proposal
I have just read
https://github.com/golang/go/issues/33892#issuecomment-659618902 and since
it was posted on a closed issue I wanted to comment a bit more.
I subscribed to this issue and read the updates for both the Go2 proposals
as well as the Go1 proposals and I enjoy reading them. I unders
21 matches
Mail list logo
