i think it's gentler to look at this in the context of c's "hello world"
program. the first version was missing both #include and void. then it
got #include. then it got void. i recall void issues with code from k&r v1
on my compiler in the mid 80s (i do not predate include statements). i
recal
i had a similar experience where i ended up pull-requesting the addition of
mod&sum into a dependency. fair enough for actively maintained packages or
packages you've contributed to before but could be problematic otherwise.
(insert any linux/bsd talk about contributing changes upstream here)
it
i think this looks nice but realistically only cleans up v simple cases. a
lot of the very-verbose-and-not-so-elegant-looking multidimensional math
stuff looks "worse" than other languages because go doesn't have operator
overloading. it is not clear to me this improves syntax too much in
practic
sorry, previous is v unclear as it's assuming a solution to question 1 in
clarification on question 2. amended below...
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 12:40 PM Jon Reiter wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 12:00 PM Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 10:48 PM
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 12:00 PM Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 10:48 PM Jon Reiter wrote:
> >
> > the draft lays out an example function GeneralAbsDifference. these
> comments build around that. i wanted to see how far i could get towards
> working
the draft lays out an example function GeneralAbsDifference. these
comments build around that. i wanted to see how far i could get towards
working specialization within this framework. the baseline assumption is
that when specialization is required today the acceptable amount of type
switching/a
golang-nuts@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 1:04 PM Jon Reiter wrote:
>>
>>> Ok. I live in Singapore. Here is a statement from the Singapore Police
>>> Force directly telling foreigners not to advocate for political causes or
>>> ri
things happening. I do not think it is fair to equate
this to orcs and wizards.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 6:55 PM Axel Wagner
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:56 AM Jon Reiter wrote:
>
>> It's not difficult to imagine banners like "free (some geographic place)"
>&
the least of your worries.
>
> Also telling that you seem to explicitly call out the Go code of conduct
> as not "impacting the entire community"? Surely I misunderstood that. Just
> pointing that out to make clear that "it impacts the entire community" is
> pretty muc
y is violating them. NBut just because it's laws
> I make wild claims about doesn't actually make the problems I talk about
> real.
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 10:33 AM Jon Reiter wrote:
>
>> I'm sorry, I think this trivializes real concerns that impact a
>> si
Except now sharing links to golang.org, or showing those web pages at
events, could be argued as advocating for a foreign political cause. And
that's illegal in much of the world. Per google, google operates in 219
countries. This could force community members to argue in any of at least
219 leg
11 matches
Mail list logo
