On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 22:56:32 +0100, you wrote:
>> He did explicitly said in the last paragraph that Go is not driven by
>> pools (aka surveys).
>
>Please re-read!
>
>The problem is that his post is quite contradictory. On the one hand he
>states that "Go is not and never has been a poll-driven lan
On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 18:58:02 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:
>I discovered that /usr/local/go was still version 1.11 for whatever reason
>Ubuntu did not update that directory when I installed go via apt/dpkg
This is correct behaviour, see below.
>I therefore downloaded
>https://dl.google.com/go/go1.12
On Fri, 24 May 2019 01:30:02 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:
>Well, the two enries are listed at the given URI, quite far apart and in
>the opposite order.
The list is alphabetical.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from t
On Fri, 24 May 2019 07:40:52 +1000, you wrote:
>The last sentence of the article is not correct. The name Go is not
>trademarked by Google, at least as a programming language trademark. There
>are other things Google makes called Go (an interesting signal on its own)
>and they might be trademarked
On Fri, 24 May 2019 07:40:52 +1000, you wrote:
>The last sentence of the article is not correct. The name Go is not
>trademarked by Google, at least as a programming language trademark. There
>are other things Google makes called Go (an interesting signal on its own)
>and they might be trademarked
On Sun, 28 Oct 2018 09:31:30 -0500, you wrote:
>To clarify, think of the performance improvements in the GC in Go from 1.1 to
>1.11. Amazing. But you only get these via recompiling which is a barrier. Many
>java installations frequently get performance improvements with no code
>changes or reco
On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 14:33:32 -0500, you wrote:
>What exactly are you referring to? I wasn’t aware of Android no longer being
>Java.
At Google I/O 2017 the Android team announced that Kotlin would be
supported as a first class language along with Java, including full
support in Android Studio.
W
On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 07:02:46 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:
>I wish go2 team would focus on cross-platform GUI rather than nobody-needed
>generics after all. There is nothing you can do atm, write your own library
>I guess...
An acceptable cross-platform GUI is a major undertaking to create an
even ha
On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 22:31:46 -0500, you wrote:
>First, there is simply no debate, Java += Android, and you have the most
>successful language/platform ever. NO debate.
Which explains why, as soon as Google gave them the choice, developers
began the stampede away from Java to Kotlin.
Java may b
On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 06:15:16 +0200, you wrote:
>But that is not what I am getting at. Five years ago I was somewhat
>involved in the effort to make Ruby an ISO standard language. From the get
>go it was a largely bureaucratic effort. We specified a common sub set of a
>then already old version of
On Sun, 13 May 2018 13:01:46 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:
>I don't think this is the attitude behind GCC, or maybe it is. I want to
>write programs that do things worth money and hope to use Go or GCC to do
>so (including working with and on those projects for free), but if they
>might include unnec
On Wed, 9 May 2018 11:12:48 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:
>Am going nuts trying to work out how to package a windows installer for
>windows10 and sign it.
>
>Microsoft are turning windows 10 basic version into a locked down system and
>so you need to make applications using their new appx format.
>
>D
On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 20:07:45 -0800 (PST), you wrote:
>I'll bet if Mozilla had used Go to write FireFox, rather than invent their
>own language, Google would have done something to stop them.
You are aware that Google helps fund Firefox (through their agreement
to be the default search engine)?
>
On Sat, 2 Dec 2017 11:37:46 -0800 (PST), you wrote:
>Google is not going to be happy if somebody uses Go to compete against
>Google. AFAIK, most if not all of Google's money comes from selling
>advertising on their
>search-engine.
Another view - Google search only works because people / compan
On Wed, 8 Nov 2017 13:57:03 -0800 (PST), you wrote:
>"Go support for aarch64 is quite disappointing.
>Qualcomm and other ARMv8
>vendors intends to put significant engineering resources to amend this
>situation, but really any one can contribute to Go. So if you want to live
>your mark, now is
On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 22:08:44 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:
>
>On Thursday, October 12, 2017 at 8:31:52 PM UTC-4, Gerald wrote:
>>
>> The MSI is a Windows application, whereas apt-get would install the
>> Linux binary of go.
>>
>> WSL has you actually running Linux binaries on Windows unless you
>> sp
On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 00:03:41 -0400, you wrote:
>Other than the file names, I'm not convinced that there is any actual
>difference
>between the go.exe you get with the MSI and the go binary that apt-get
>installs
There is a difference.
The MSI is a Windows application, whereas apt-get would insta
17 matches
Mail list logo
