Thank you kortschak, yes that was all I was doing. Seeking advice from
people who have better knowledge than me in this area. Again, very grateful
for everyone's help.
On Thursday, 25 August 2022 at 09:54:13 UTC+1 kortschak wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-08-25 at 01:47 -0700, Holloway Kean Ho wrote:
>
...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 2:58 PM 'Gopher-Insane' via golang-nuts <
> golan...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
>> They are suggesting that Go is being more widely used than others, making
>> it more of a risk.
>>
>>
> Is their
They are suggesting that Go is being more widely used than others, making
it more of a risk.
On Tuesday, 23 August 2022 at 13:15:06 UTC+1 jesper.lou...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 3:30 PM 'Gopher-Insane' via golang-nuts <
> golan...@googlegroups.com> wrote
on is a good technique to use.
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 9:30 AM 'Gopher-Insane' via golang-nuts <
> golan...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> So our security team has raised a concern with Go and malware. The link
>> that was sent to m
erous. Tavis Ormandy has enjoyed a constant stream of cases where
> running antivirus "protections" was actually the gateway to serious
> exploits.
>
> Behavior-based detection is a good technique to use.
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 9:30 AM 'Gopher-Insane' vi
Hi
So our security team has raised a concern with Go and malware. The link
that was sent to me was
https://securityboulevard.com/2021/09/behavior-based-detection-can-stop-exotic-malware/
.
I reached out to Bill Kennedy on Twitter who disagreed that Go was a
problem. Said it was worth posting h
