They are suggesting that Go is being more widely used than others, making it more of a risk.
On Tuesday, 23 August 2022 at 13:15:06 UTC+1 jesper.lou...@gmail.com wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 3:30 PM 'Gopher-Insane' via golang-nuts < > golan...@googlegroups.com> wrote: > >> Hi >> >> So our security team has raised a concern with Go and malware. The link >> that was sent to me was >> https://securityboulevard.com/2021/09/behavior-based-detection-can-stop-exotic-malware/ >> . >> I reached out to Bill Kennedy on Twitter who disagreed that Go was a >> problem. Said it was worth posting here to hear people's thoughts. >> >> > How is the story in the link supporting their position? What is their > position in the first place? > > The story is that malware is being written in languages other than C and > C++. Well, that's inevitable, because malware is an infinite arms race > between avoidance and detection. The story is further that we should use > behavior detection of malware, which is obviously a worthy idea. Most > languages are useable as vehicles for malware, and I fail to see the reason > any particular language should be singled out as being of concern. > > -- > J. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/63527e94-331d-45bd-9d5a-019c0df4aba9n%40googlegroups.com.
