Re: [go-nuts] Unintuitive error message for external modules that lack a go.mod

The version I'm using is go1.22.6. To reproduce the issue, I created a repository. This repository does not contain a go.mod, but it could still be imported. Since the modules within the same repository can be used without placing a go.mod in each of them, I mistakenly thought that an external

[go-nuts] ANN: selfy for self-signed certs. rpc25519 for blazing QUIC based RPC

I wrote this RPC package recently: https://github.com/glycerine/rpc25519 `rpc25519` is a fun little RPC package that I cooked up to get comfortable with modern (Ed25519) rather than antiquated (RSA) crypto primitives. Along the way I made a very helpful tool called `selfy`. It makes generating s

Re: [go-nuts] Unintuitive error message for external modules that lack a go.mod

On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 8:39 AM rojiu wrote: > > I ran into this error when trying to create a module with a single Go file > and import it from GitHub: > > ``` > predeclared any requires go1.18 or later (-lang was set to go1.16; check > go.mod) > ``` > > After some digging, I learned that since

[go-nuts] Unintuitive error message for external modules that lack a go.mod

I ran into this error when trying to create a module with a single Go file and import it from GitHub: ``` predeclared any requires go1.18 or later (-lang was set to go1.16; check go.mod) ``` After some digging, I learned that since Go 1.18, external modules need a go.mod file. Without one, t

[go-nuts] Go fuzzing complex types recommendations

Fell free to redirect me if this was already replied somewhere else. Go language fuzzing only supports primitive types. On the other hand, the recently archived project github.com/google/gofuzz allows to fuzz complex data types, such as structs. That project