On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 1:11 AM Michał Matczuk wrote:
>
> net.ListenConfig does not document the context usage. The docs just point to
> Listen. I'd expect that cancelling the context would stop the listener but
> it's not the case.
>
> The questions are:
>
> * Should Listener created with net.L
On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 4:54 PM Mike Schilling
wrote:
>
> If so,is it likely. to look more like the current small API, of the larger
> one discussed in Russ Cox's Coroutines for Go?
There are no plans for this at present.
Ian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goog
Suggest sounds wrong - encourage is what I meant. On Oct 20, 2024, at 6:59 PM, Robert Engels wrote:Ugh. This comes up all the time. You don’t need or want coroutines if you have lightweight concurrency. I suggest reading up on structured concurrency in the Java Loom project. On Oct 20, 2024, at 6
Ugh. This comes up all the time. You don’t need or want coroutines if you have lightweight concurrency. I suggest reading up on structured concurrency in the Java Loom project. On Oct 20, 2024, at 6:54 PM, Mike Schilling wrote:If so,is it likely. to look more like the current small API, of the la
If so,is it likely. to look more like the current small API, of the larger
one discussed in Russ Cox's Coroutines for Go?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e
On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 12:15 PM Himanshu Balurkar
wrote:
>
> https://github.com/golang/net/blob/5716b9813d2c78aa3bb6e08160517facfb2e84e6/internal/socks/socks.go#L233-L245
>
> At the above link, the address string argument in the validateTarget function
> is not used anywhere. Unclear why the par
https://github.com/golang/net/blob/5716b9813d2c78aa3bb6e08160517facfb2e84e6/internal/socks/socks.go#L233-L245
At the above link, the address string argument in the validateTarget
function is not used anywhere. Unclear why the parameter is there. It is
not for the interface satisfaction.
It mig
Hey folks, do you use Fuzz Testing in Go? And if yes for which use cases.
p.s. I made this video a while back on this topic -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8STTZWdG9Y
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this
Why do you want that? ---> Lots of reasons
- Less AV detection for exe compiled by Go from Virustotal
- More control on the IAT in exe (I can fine tune detection)
- Combined with -buildmode=pie I am closer on getting a shellcode
About the last point, I am studying if it is possible
