To emphasize the wisdom:
With an implicit conversion like you mentioned, the F(x) invocation at
the bottom expects B.SomeFunc() will be called but in fact,
A.SomeFunc() will be called. That's why this is an error. You can
still do F(A(x)), which explicitly makes a copy of x as an A.
This is not
On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 3:22 PM Michael Ellis wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, June 7, 2019 at 3:01:04 PM UTC-4, Burak Serdar wrote:
>>
>>
>> If one library defines string.Render() for html, and another defines
>> another string.Render() for, say, a graphics library, which Render
>> will be called when I ca
I'm wondering about a couple factors in this comparison that seem to make a
difference in my local test:
1. I think perl sockets are write buffered. So would the equivalent be
to wrap the net.Conn in bufio.NewWriter(c) and flush before the Close?
2. Since this is a straigh-line test whe
On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 3:01 PM Wojciech S. Czarnecki wrote:
>
> On Sat, 8 Jun 2019 09:56:05 -0400
> Tong Sun wrote:
>
> > Agree that it was not an apples to apples comparison. So please check
> > out my 2nd blog:
> >
> > https://dev.to/suntong/simple-web-server-in-perl-and-go-revisit-5d82
> >
>
>
This is totally possible, you can either use 'go tool nm' as suggest,
or 'go tool objdump', both tools can answer this question.
go tool objdump -s 'pkgname/internal' a.out
go tool nm a.out | grep 'pkgname/internal'
Be aware that testing against the shown examples, neither A() will be
present, by d
On Sat, 8 Jun 2019 17:25:11 -0400
Michael Ellis wrote:
> Oops, got that the wrong way round. Should read "allow passing a Bar for
> argument of type Foo".
type Foo int
type Bar = Foo
func main() {
var fo Foo = 1
var ba Bar = 77
upbar(fo, "Foo")
upbar(ba, "Bar")
}
Oops, got that the wrong way round. Should read "allow passing a Bar for
argument of type Foo".
Cheers,
Mike
*“I want you to act as if the house was on fire. Because it is.” — Greta
Thunberg*
On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 5:22 PM Michael Ellis
wrote:
>
> On Friday, June 7, 2019 at 3:01:04 PM UTC-4, B
On Friday, June 7, 2019 at 3:01:04 PM UTC-4, Burak Serdar wrote:
>
>
> If one library defines string.Render() for html, and another defines
> another string.Render() for, say, a graphics library, which Render
> will be called when I call "str".Render()?
>
> Thanks for the explanation. That make
Since Go effectively requires source code for compilation, I think what you’re
asking for is impossible as the dev can just copy the source under a different
function name, including most stdlib code.
> On Jun 8, 2019, at 1:48 PM, Andrew Klager wrote:
>
> Take a look at https://golang.org/cm
On Sat, 8 Jun 2019 09:56:05 -0400
Tong Sun wrote:
> Agree that it was not an apples to apples comparison. So please check
> out my 2nd blog:
>
> https://dev.to/suntong/simple-web-server-in-perl-and-go-revisit-5d82
>
Trying to make sense of your measures...
...Still apples to oranges due to te
Take a look at https://golang.org/cmd/nm/
On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 1:38 PM wrote:
> I'm looking for some type of tool or method to examine a compiled go
> binary and confirm that a list of functions is NOT included in the compiled
> binary.
>
> example:
> package internal
>
> func A() string {
I'm looking for some type of tool or method to examine a compiled go binary
and confirm that a list of functions is NOT included in the compiled binary.
example:
package internal
func A() string {
return "func A"
}
func B() string {
return "func B"
}
func C() string {
return "func C"
}
Hey! I have redesigned the golang worker setup based on the use cases I have
found after using it for syncing purpose for the last one year.
Please do let me know if I am missing anything.
https://mayur-tolexo.github.io/sworker/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goo
Are you kidding? without ORMs you can't model relationships. People choose
languages like religion, but seriously look at the power of Rails'
ActiveRecord. It's amazing.
On Saturday, March 8, 2014 at 2:37:13 PM UTC-6, Nate Finch wrote:
>
> I find sqlx (https://github.com/jmoiron/sqlx) to be a
Hi! the aes256-ctr is secure iff the exchange of keys is secure. the
exchange keys need use a post-quantum algorithm for this,
that in turn return to need for a post-quantum crypto. The nist list is a
good list to find someone bind or pure go version. :-)
Thanks! :-)
Em sábado, 8 de junho de
Nist have a second round for list post-quantum resistent cryptos, if
someone dont't have a new one, a bind in go for this list is Wellcome. :-)
Em sexta-feira, 7 de junho de 2019 21:23:19 UTC-3, Michael Jones escreveu:
>
> Your question is maybe a decade premature. Post-quantum cryptography, as
Couple of things that you might want to investigate:
1. Is SetReadDeadline the same as SO_RCVTIMEO (vm vs socket)?
2. Is c.Close() the same as shutdown (flushes vs doesn't)?
3. Is print is the same as fmt.Fprintf / c.Write (buffered vs unbuffered)?
With the go I'd be tempted to put everything fr
Agree that it was not an apples to apples comparison. So please check
out my 2nd blog:
https://dev.to/suntong/simple-web-server-in-perl-and-go-revisit-5d82
> thanks to Axel Wagner, who replaced the net/http.Server layer with direct
> translation of Perl code, the code is now reading and writing
18 matches
Mail list logo
