Plenty of previous discussions on the subject. Here's an example from 2012:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/golang-nuts/wcrZ3P1zeAk/KaR68a8rROEJ
I don't think reasoning has changed.
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 10:38 PM Dat Huynh wrote:
>
> Just a question.
>
> Why does Go allow to call a method with
Just a question.
Why does Go allow to call a method with a nil pointer?
https://play.golang.org/p/xPehesnfK9b
Thanks,
Dat.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send a
Doing native UI in Go isn't something I would recommend a total newbie to
programming to do as most if not all the tutorials you would find would be
written for C/C++.
So then you would have to figure out how to translate that to the Go
bindings or maybe even have to write parts of the program i
I've never worked with it but it looks like GTK might be a good choice.
It's cross platform and says there is a version for Go.
https://www.gtk.org/language-bindings.php
On Monday, September 3, 2018 at 12:49:12 PM UTC-4, Diego Rocha wrote:
>
> What UI framework are you using in production? I'
On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 1:08 AM, 'Charlton Trezevant' via golang-nuts
wrote:
>
> Link: [Getting specific about generics, by Emily
> Maier](https://emilymaier.net/words/getting-specific-about-generics/)
>
> The interface-based alternative to contracts seems like such a natural fit-
> It’s simple, st
NB I’m unable to reproduce this bug without the pointer indirection.
On Tuesday, September 4, 2018 at 3:38:35 AM UTC+10, Sam Whited wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018, at 04:10, ama...@naucera.net wrote:
> > type S []int
> >
> > func (s *S) Last() int {
> > return (*s)[len(*s) - 1]
> > }
>
NB I']m
On Tuesday, September 4, 2018 at 3:38:35 AM UTC+10, Sam Whited wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018, at 04:10, ama...@naucera.net wrote:
> > type S []int
> >
> > func (s *S) Last() int {
> > return (*s)[len(*s) - 1]
> > }
>
> On an unrelated matter, the extra indirection is (probably)
Thanks, that looks like what I’m seeing (I’m able to coax it to produce a
pointer which segfaults the runtime).
On Tuesday, September 4, 2018 at 3:34:43 AM UTC+10, Paul Jolly wrote:
>
> I suspect that you've just run into some variation on
> https://github.com/golang/go/issues/27378
>
> Giovan
>
> *Question 1*: are calls from JS into Go/WASM expected to be asynchronous?
> If so, is the callback passing approach the best way to get return values
> back to the JS code?
>
Please see https://github.com/golang/go/issues/26045. Yes they are
currently async, but they will become sync
--
You
Hello!
I've been running some experiments with WASM support in Go 1.11.
One of the experiments involves compiling a Go library into WASM and then
calling it from JS. The post below mentions how to expose Go functions to
JS, however, my experiments have shown that calls from JS into Go/WASM are
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018, at 04:10, ama...@naucera.net wrote:
> type S []int
>
> func (s *S) Last() int {
> return (*s)[len(*s) - 1]
> }
On an unrelated matter, the extra indirection is (probably) not what you want
here, slices are already a pointer type. For more information see
https://blog.go
I suspect that you've just run into some variation on
https://github.com/golang/go/issues/27378
Giovanni/Daniel/others better placed might be able to confirm more
precisely however.
On Mon, 3 Sep 2018 at 17:49, wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Since Go 1.11, the following test seems to pass when I would
you may give a context to the goroutine?
在 2018年9月3日星期一 UTC+8下午2:03:24，Robert Engels写道：
>
> Hi, I recently started developing more complex concurrent Go applications.
>
> Using the debugger is very difficult - since when looking for a particular
> routine, the list only shows the top level method
MiDOS track at SAC 2019
Call for Papers
Microservices, DevOps, and Service-Oriented Architecture
of the 34th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium
Hey, so I'm currently trying to create a custom shell.
I am currently trying to implement the EOF exit (^D). Currently, I am able
to use exit as input and a variety of other
commands, platform-specific; anything, not windows related (WIP), but I am
having an issue with the EOF causing
an infinit
What UI framework are you using in production? I'm trying to do a simple
text editor, but actually I don't know what framework I should use. (I'm
new to the language and to the world of programming) thanks.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts
Hi all,
Since Go 1.11, the following test seems to pass when I would expect it to
panic with index out of range:
package weirdness
import "testing"
type S []int
func (s *S) Last() int {
return (*s)[len(*s) - 1]
}
func TestWeirdness(t *testing.T) {
var s S
defer func() {}()
Mage (https://github.com/magefile/mage) had not been using semantic
versioning, and this caused problems with go modules. To support go
modules, I have ripped out the v2.x tags, and keps mage on v1. This is
semantically correct, since mage has always been backwards compatible. It
also makes
And here we have the problem. Low probability of error events do not
scale.
On Fri, 2018-08-31 at 19:30 -0700, Jim wrote:
> Changes from the master/development go.mod will need to be carefully
> merged
> into release go.mod.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
On Mon, 3 Sep 2018 06:22:27 +
Anik Hasibul wrote:
> Can you please provide an example? I am new to golang.
>
Create N client receivers with channel and save the list of client
channel as list,
for x := 0; x < 5; x++ {
cl := make(chan int, 1)
chanClients
The code used in the playground was unfortunately not the proper one here
is a link to the new code
https://play.golang.org/p/kbRsWxsQwE0
since current version of playground (as of 2018-09-03) is still 1.10.3 the
playground does not show the issue
I've logged an issue there to track the resolut
Go's concurrency is based on CSP (communication sequence process), not
Actor Model. Hence you can have channels and manage all the communications
through channels. For this, there is no need for named actors - unlike the
actor model, where all communications are managed via mailboxes.
These are
22 matches
Mail list logo
