On June 1, 2015 5:43:10 PM EDT, Jerry wrote:
>On Mon, 1 Jun 2015 22:17:33 +0200, Einar Ryeng stated:
>
>> > A comment worth reading in case one does not see it oneself IMHO:
>> >
>https://blogs.fsfe.org/gerloff/2015/06/01/facebook-offers-to-send-you-encrypted-emails-this-wont-help-you/
>
>>
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I don't see any harm in it. I uploaded my public key and they verified that I
could decrypt it by a link in an encrypted email. 5 whole seconds out of my day
to get encrypted emails from Facebook. They now have information that was
publicly availa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On June 1, 2015 7:20:33 PM EDT, ant...@blazrsoft.com wrote:
>I don't see any harm in it. I uploaded my public key and they verified
>that I could decrypt it by a link in an encrypted email. 5 whole
>seconds out of my day to get encrypted emails from
On February 12, 2016 1:04:31 AM EST, st...@mailbox.org wrote:
>
>Yes, indeed. I guess I found it in my dreams, i.e. when I woke up, it
>came
>to my mind that it might be simply N for number...
>
At least you figured it out. I'm sure someone will have that same question in
the future and this thr
On December 27, 2016 4:09:35 PM EST, Don Warner Saklad wrote:
>What do you kind folks out there make of comments at
>https://stallman.org/gpg.html
> >"I'm told that key servers carry many phony keys claiming to be
> mine. Here is info about which keys are really mine."
>
> >"Of course, to be rea
On January 30, 2017 6:42:22 PM EST, Miroslav Rovis
wrote:
>I'm reviving this end-of-last-year thread, because...
>
>It's this repo, where the latest two tags are PGP-signed:
>https://github.com/Synzvato/decentraleyes/tags
>
>Can anybody check if maybe they can get that key from the keyservers?
I
;t
think it does).
This is just off the top of my head since I'm not at my computer at the moment
to verify, but that's the gist of it.
--
HTH,
Antony
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On February 21, 2017 9:34:17 AM EST, "Gerd v. Egidy"
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'd like to announce a program I wrote to backup GnuPG and SSH keys as
>qrcodes on paper:
>
>paperbackup.py
>https://github.com/intra2net/paperbackup
>
Just wanted to say thanks for sharing your work. As for paperkey, I have a
On February 26, 2017 5:30:20 AM EST, Jerry wrote:
>
>gpg: can't handle key algorithm 22
>gpg: can't handle key algorithm 18
>
>I am not sure what that is referring to. Also, there are numerous keys
>listed as revoked or expired. Is there a anything I can run from the
>command line that will automa
On March 11, 2017 12:27:25 PM EST, Werner Koch wrote:
>The reason for this is that some mail sites now have a DMARC reject
>policy which leads to a bounce for all subscribers whose mail provider
>honors this DMARC policy - for example gmail. After a few bounces
>message delivery to those subscri
anual
pages which provides a more in depth explanation of various options. There are
various guides on the website, but I don't have any links for them at the
moment.
--
HTH,
Antony
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
__
lty hashing algorithm used by the site. My personal preference for
generating file hashes is OpenSSL since it is widely used and therefore fairly
reliable in my opinion as an inconsistencies would be pointed out quickly.
--
Regards,
Antony
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse m
On May 22, 2017 12:07:39 PM EDT, David Vallier wrote:
>Can someone please explain why I am getting a yellow bar on a LOT of
>signed msgs saying that the key type is unknown??
>
>the exact msg is "Part of the message signed with unknown key; the key
>type is not supported by your version of GnuPG"
_
>Gnupg-users mailing list
>Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
>http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
I wasn't aware TrueCrypt had been abandoned. I also haven't visited their site
for some time. That's a shame though. Its a useful piece of software. I hope
someone continu
attention :)
>
> Cheers,
> Daniele
>
I'm no expert on the subject, but it seems the simplest and safest
solution would be to use a subkey of a dedicated key and rotate it
periodically if you're concerned about the key being compromised,
especially since the key will not be
se proposals become official standards.
I'm also interested on anyone else's thoughts who might have more
insight into the downsides or repercussions of relying strictly on such
a system (if external CA's no longer existed, for example).
[1]https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4035
[2]https:
f I can do it, anyone can.
Its disheartening to see something so promising pushed to the side for
so long when it could be a major benefit as far as internet security is
concerned. Thanks for your reply BTW. :)
- --
Antony Prince
Key ID: 0x4F040744
Fingerprint: FE96 5B7F A708 18D3 B74B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 3/13/2015 9:28 PM, Antony Prince wrote:
>> As far as I know, most if not all of the DNS resolvers
>> immediately
>>> available on a client system don’t perform DNSSEC validation.
> I use BIND(named) as my DNS server and
26e0c917d02d1847dfecfcd0c2
Wow... this is a great concept. I'm looking forward to trying it out.
--
Antony Prince
Key ID: 0x4F040744
Fingerprint: FE96 5B7F A708 18D3 B74B 959F A6E1 6242 4F04 0744
URL: keyserver.blazrsoft.com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
the server,
compiling and packaging the software, etc.) especially for software that
has a one man development team.
--
Antony Prince
Key ID: 0x4F040744
Fingerprint: FE96 5B7F A708 18D3 B74B 959F A6E1 6242 4F04 0744
URL: keyserver.blazrsoft.com
signature.asc
s. gnupg2), but its easy to see
how that could be confusing. Easier than compiling it and all its
dependencies from source, that's for darn sure.
--
Antony Prince
Key ID: 0x4F040744
Fingerprint: FE96 5B7F A708 18D3 B74B 959F A6E1 6242 4F04 0744
URL: keyserver.blazrsoft.com
signature.a
I admit I didn't check. Seemed odd that they wouldn't since Ubuntu is
known for keeping its repositories pretty up-to-date.
--
Antony Prince
Key ID: 0x4F040744
Fingerprint: FE96 5B7F A708 18D3 B74B 959F A6E1 6242 4F04 0744
URL: keyserver.blazrsoft.com
signature.asc
Desc
recognized fine
> and no attachment. So a bug, i.e. the extra attachment, in Enigmail's
> reading of mails that have gone through Mailman even though Mailman
> produced MIME should be valid?
>
FWIW, I use Thunderbird 31.5.0 and Enigmail 1.8.1 (2015-03-23) and the
signatures veri
he email
address is just a more human readable way of referring to their
identifier on the server. I could be wrong though and I'm sure Mike can
explain it better.
--
Antony Prince
Key ID: 0x4F040744
Fingerprint: FE96 5B7F A708 18D3 B74B 959F A6E1 6242 4F04 0744
URL: keyserver.blazrsoft
by adding -llber to
the LDAPLIBS variable in the Makefile for dirmngr.
root@050415:/usr/local/src/dirmngr-1.1.0/src# diff Makefile.bak Makefile
160c160
< LDAPLIBS = -lldap
- ---
> LDAPLIBS = -lldap -llber
Just a heads-up as I'm not sure if anyone else has run into this issue.
- --
f apt. There's no need to uninstall it. Just modify your system path
to find the new version first. In my case, I altered /etc/environment
so that /usr/local/bin comes before /bin in the PATH. After reading
the other replies though, I'm not sure whether this will cause any
keyring issues.
On 2015-06-02 02:17, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
> Now we just need a facebook app to generate keys ...
But would you trust that app? :-)
-- Jason
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
ht
On 2015-06-02 05:28, MFPA wrote:
> Not convinced I would trust such an app on *any* website.
It would be rather naïve to do so, indeed.
> Would the suggestion be to upload a plain vanilla key not used
> elsewhere, that has made and gathered no certifications?
This is exactly what I have done i
rn/fix. Considering I'm not a professional, expectations here should
be pretty low. ;-)
- --
Antony Prince
Key ID: 0xAF3D4087301B1B19
Fingerprint: 591FF17F7A4AA8D0F659C482AF3D4087301B1B19
URL: https://keyserver.blazrsoft.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJV7
On 09/08/2015 05:52 PM, Antony Prince wrote:
> On 09/08/2015 05:29 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> The offender seems to be jUnit. The gnupg-for-java code uses a lot of
>> imports like "junit.framework", and the current jUnit drops everything
>> in the org.junit
t have to rebuild from scratch on each platform they want to
> work on.
>
> I'm certainly not saying you need to do these things, Antony. I'm just
> saying that if other people are looking for bite-sized chunks, there are
> several of them waiting to be bitten. :)
>
On 09/09/2015 01:39 PM, Antony Prince wrote:
> On 09/09/2015 10:10 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> Other stuff that needs to be done: verify it works on Java 1.8, clean up
>> the OS X build (which is really hackish), and consider distributing
>> pre-built jarfiles containing
On 09/09/2015 10:45 PM, Antony Prince wrote:
> since maven is actually controlling the ant build. My objective
> currently is to produce the binaries for Linux since the default maven
> build creates the *.jar and *.so files needed to make this process
> easier for those who prefer
On 09/10/2015 05:17 PM, Antony Prince wrote:
> without gpgme installed). I'm not 100% sure how to test the
> functionality of the binary and library, so if anyone wants to give it a
> go, I'd be glad to hear the results. The ftp server[2] allows for
> anonymous download.
&g
On 9/17/2015 7:59 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> This is all great work, Antony! We'd be happy to include it in our repo.
> We've basically only used gnupg-for-java in our Android app GnuPG for Android,
> so it is not so polished on desktop, as you saw.
>
> .hc
>
For those who'd prefer a TLS encrypted download over plain FTP, the
compiled binaries can be found at
https://www.blazrsoft.com/gnupg-for-java . They are the exact same files
as the ftp downloads, just symlinked into the web server.
--
Antony Prince
Key ID: 0xAF3D4087301B1B19
Finger
igned by that one as well. My name may or may not
really be "Antony Prince", but the keys created with that UID are
chained together by their signatures. I could go even further and make a
short web page listing the previous and current fingerprints and why I
revoked the previous key (call
ms:
Pubkey: RSA, ELG, DSA, ECDH, ECDSA, EDDSA
Cipher: IDEA, 3DES, CAST5, BLOWFISH, AES, AES192, AES256, TWOFISH,
CAMELLIA128, CAMELLIA192, CAMELLIA256
Hash: SHA1, RIPEMD160, SHA256, SHA384, SHA512, SHA224
Compression: Uncompressed, ZIP, ZLIB, BZIP2
antony@050415:~/Desktop$ gpg2 --keyserv
#x27;m assuming it is fine. Haven't looked at the iptables
in a while, so I don't remember specifically. Thanks for the heads-up
though.
--
Antony Prince
Key ID: 0xAF3D4087301B1B19
Fingerprint: 591F F17F 7A4A A8D0 F659 C482 AF3D 4087 301B 1B19
URL:
http://keyserver.blazrso
the chain for the offending IP, as
long as you have a LOG rule before the packet is dropped of course.
[1]http://cipherdyne.org/psad/
--
Antony Prince
Key ID: 0xAF3D4087301B1B19
Fingerprint: 591F F17F 7A4A A8D0 F659 C482 AF3D 4087 301B 1B19
URL:
http://keyserver.blazrsoft.com/pks/lookup?op=g
ated and do not share
keys to other keyservers. The largest pool of public keyservers that I
know of is the SKS pool, but there may be others that I'm unaware of.
[1]https://sks-keyservers.net/
--
Antony Prince
Key ID: 0xAF3D4087301B1B19
Fingerprint: 591F F17F 7A4A A8D0 F659 C482 AF3D 40
anproject/gnupg-for-java
--
Antony Prince
Key ID: 0xAF3D4087301B1B19
Fingerprint: 591F F17F 7A4A A8D0 F659 C482 AF3D 4087 301B 1B19
URL:
http://pool.sks-keyservers.net/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xAF3D4087301B1B19
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digi
oftware: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
Home: C:/Users/antony/AppData/Roaming/gnupg
Supported algorithms:
Pubkey: RSA, ELG, DSA, ECDH, ECDSA, EDDSA
Cipher: IDEA, 3DES, CAST5, BLOWFISH, AES, AES192, AES256, TWOFISH,
CAMELL
On 1/28/2016 12:45 AM, Antony Prince wrote:
> F:\Downloads>gpg --version
> gpg (GnuPG) 2.1.10
I also just realized that you said BAD signature with gnupg _stable_ and
my test was not with stable. My apologies.
--
Antony Prince
Key ID: 0xAF3D4087301B1B19
Fingerprint: 591F F17F 7A4A
On 1/28/2016 4:32 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
...
>
> Antony Prince was the guy updating Guardian Project's code. See the
> thread at:
>
> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/73146
>
> According to Antony, you can grab his updates from:
>
>
had the same issue on Ubuntu until I installed
libbz2-devel I believe it was. If the compression development libraries
are missing, gnupg will just compile without support for them. Hopefully
this will point you in the right direction. I could be mistaken though.
--
A
On March 24, 2016 11:17:58 PM EDT, "Marcio Barbado, Jr."
wrote:
>Not sure if it's counterintuitive once tossing can be seen as
>abandoning inertia.
>
>
>Marcio Barbado, Jr.
>
>
>
>On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Peter Lebbing
> wrote:
>> On 14/03/16 10:37, Fulano Diego Perez wrote:
>>>
>https://
On March 25, 2016 12:34:51 AM EDT, Antony Prince wrote:
>On March 24, 2016 11:17:58 PM EDT, "Marcio Barbado, Jr."
> wrote:
>>Not sure if it's counterintuitive once tossing can be seen as
>>abandoning inertia.
>>
>>
>>Marcio Barbado, Jr.
>&g
On March 25, 2016 9:24:00 AM EDT, Brad Rogers wrote:
>On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 11:11:28 +0100
>Guan Xin wrote:
>
>Hello Guan,
>
>>Why does it happen?
>
>Google are a law unto themselves.
May be a reverse lookup issue. Werner mentioned he added a V6 address to the
server yesterday. Some MTA's do a r
gt;
Guardianproject has a port of gnupg to android[1] that might be of some
use to you.
[1]https://github.com/guardianproject/gnupg-for-android
--
Antony Prince
Key ID: 0xAF3D4087301B1B19
Fingerprint: 591F F17F 7A4A A8D0 F659 C482 AF3D 4087 301B 1B19
URL:
http://pool.sks-keyservers.net/pks
gt;
I just realized the project I linked was the exact one you were talking
about. :-) In this case though, I'd say there's no need to re-invent the
wheel. They've already got it ported to Android and if you can fit it to
your needs, then I'd go with that.
--
Antony Princ
ant, but it is *a*
solution, provided that you can find software to use the V2 keys of course.
--
Antony
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
GPGME is an interface to access the functions of gpg. You can do
this directly with your program and gpg without GPGME, but it would
likely be fairly cumbersome which is why GPGME came about. That's merely
my understanding of it and I could be wrong.
--
Antony Prince
Key ID: 0xAF3D40873
to the remote machine so you get a curses pinentry or some such. To get
it to perform a call to pinentry on your local machine would require the
call to be routed back through the tunnel.
Neither response is much help, I know, but just my thoughts on what the
issue is. Hopefully, one of the gurus on the
I know this has got to be something simple. When invoking gpg2 normally
to decrypt, I get:
gpg: encrypted with 4096-bit RSA key, ID 0E98CD22ADB13E99, created
2015-05-06
"Antony Prince "
gpg: public key decryption failed: No pinentry
gpg: decryption failed: No secret key
I hav
On September 12, 2016 6:58:08 AM EDT, Kristian Fiskerstrand
wrote:
>
>I'd suggest creating another primary key for explicit local
>certification purposes you never use anywhere else, and can rotate that
>as often as wanted to start fresh from time to time.
That's what I do. I have a separate key
, the agent appears to start normally.
antony@050415:~$ sudo ps -aux | grep gpg-agent | grep -v grep
antony1717 0.0 0.0 174064 808 ?Ss 13:33 0:00
/usr/local/bin/gpg-agent
> What does a
> gpg-agent --daemon --write-env-file
> output in terms of GPG-AGENT_INFO?
> I
them by hand?
The command to cause pinentry to appear:
gpg2 -o enc.txt -d enc.gpg
enc.gpg is a text file encrypted to my key for testing purposes.
antony@050415:~$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS
Release:14.04
Codename:
le
operations through it. I don't think I had anything that would have helped with
the Mac situation.
- --
Antony
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQJCBAEBCgAsJRxBbnRvbnkgUHJpbmNlIDxhbnRvbnlAYmxhenJzb2Z0LmNvbT4F
Alf39EQACgkQrz1AhzAbGxnTAA//UrxwaxnTQS0euBgBMNK6KptCz
soft CA
according to the documentation in an article[2] I found.
HTH,
Antony
[1]https://www.openssl.org
[2]https://support.forcepoint.com/KBArticle?id=How-to-use-OpenSSL-and-Microsoft-Certification-Authority
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
On 1/12/2017 5:35 PM, Antony Prince wrote:
> On 1/12/2017 6:14 AM, Ali Hassan Hamed Al Ajmi (eChannels) wrote:
>>
>> Does *"GnuPG" *support creating CR (CSR) that is compatible with
>> Microsoft CA (from command line/ other tools with GUI)?
>
> Not sure on th
On 1/20/2017 8:39 AM, unknown wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> it worked fine, altough i got this message on the terminal:
>
> process@process ~ $ tar cf gnupg-backup.tar .gnupg/
> tar: .gnupg/S.gpg-agent: socket ignored
>
> Is this important?
No. It just means that tar skipped the socket file for gpg-agen
as added
in 2.4.
[0]https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/wiki/SWEET32
--
Antony
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On 2/3/2017 9:53 PM, MyCraigs List wrote:
> Thanks Antony. I got the txt files of the secret keys.I hope. I wonder
> if there's a way to get the public, private and ID and associated email
> addresses all backed up into a nice neat txt file?
>
You could change:
gpg -
l.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys 3F533109A9509B14
gpg: keyserver receive failed: No data
$gpg --keyserver hkp://pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 3F533109A9509B14
gpg: keyserver receive failed: No data
The key does not appear to be on either of those sets of keyservers.
--
Antony
signature.asc
Descript
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2014-08-27 15:02, Mark Rousell wrote:
> No. Taking part in social networks and other media is a choice. One
> can a) choose not to take part at all, or b) choose how one takes
> part and what information one shares.
What can't be controlled is w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2014-11-14 22:45, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
> I have done everything correctly - and my conclusions are still
> the same NO ONE HAS EVER SUCCESSFULLY MADE A MIRROR COPY OF THEIR
> .GNUPG AND HAD A FULLY 100 PER CENT WORKING SIGNING AND ENCRYPTION
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2014-11-14 09:33, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
> But I get the following error when signing my mail: "Key 0xAAd8C47D
> not found or not valid. The (sub-)key might have expired." The key
> is visible in Enigmail Kgpg Kleopatra GPA I'm not able to edit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2014-11-15 04:13, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
> Another pointless answer - no practical data - so there's no
> validity in what you say
You are squandering the goodwill of those trying to help you with such
responses, of which you have sent many mor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2014-11-21 03:54, Shea Levy wrote:
> Hmm, I’m having a hard time imagining how someone could get me to
> divulge the passphrase if they couldn’t also get me to hand over
> the key backups I own. Of course, my imagination is not the limit
> here,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2014-11-22 18:54, Dave Pawson wrote:
> I installed keepassx. Not much use to me. 1. Illegible with my
> eyesight (reported to them) 2. Insufficient fields (seems to be non
> expandable).
Try Keepass2 (official). It worked fine for me when I last
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2014-11-22 20:23, Dave Pawson wrote:
> Not found for Fedora.
It can be done for Fedora. You'll need to download the portable
version of Keepass2 from the official website, and install the Mono
runtimes and xdotool.
After extracting the keepass2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2014-11-27 07:56, Tristan Santore wrote:
> Fedora is not dodgy! We only support Fedora for 2 releases + 1
> month! Stop using unsupported distributions then. Quite an ignorant
> statement to make. And that is the last I am writing.
More proof th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2/16/2015 12:39 PM, Stephan Beck wrote:
> Hi, Christopher,
>
> Am 16.02.2015 um 13:01 schrieb Christopher Beck:
>>
>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>
>>> now I'll use the inline format. If you can now verify my
>>> signature, this still could be the same bug (or
x
with SSH seems to be going okay. A few issues with ssh-agent being
present, etc. All that seems to be working okay now. The issue I'm
having is using Putty and gnupg on Windows. The versions are:
OS: Windows 7 SP1 x64
Putty: 0.63
C:\Users\antony>gpg --version
gpg (GnuPG) 2.1.20
libgcrypt
On 4/13/2017 7:06 AM, Jerry wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 16:42:57 -0400, Antony Prince stated:
>
...
>>
>> OS: Windows 7 SP1 x64
>> Putty: 0.63
>>
...
>> When I try to connect to the server with putty using the "Attempt
>> authentication usin
On 4/13/2017 1:40 PM, Antony Prince wrote:
> On 4/13/2017 7:06 AM, Jerry wrote:
>> On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 16:42:57 -0400, Antony Prince stated:
>>
...
>>> When I try to connect to the server with putty using the "Attempt
>>> authentication using Pageant
use via compile time flags. If I'm wrong
there, I'm sure someone else on the list can point you in the right
direction.
--
--
HTH,
Antony Prince
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
You need to verify the key that signed it. A valid signature means nothing. A
malicious actor could sign any message or days with a valid, verifiable key and
send it to you. The heart of the matter is the key that signed it. Gnupg tells
you which key signed the data, usually by long key ID IIRC.
nd it unless you
use MinGW or something like it, but that will only further
complicate the process.
--
--
Antony Prince
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
ver tinkered
with it, but BouncyCastle can be found here [1].
[0] https://github.com/guardianproject/gnupg-for-java
[1] http://bouncycastle.org/java.html
--
--
Antony Prince
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
/ Meilleures Salutations / Mit Freundlichen Grüssen
Antony
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
fortunately I'm not sure if this would work if I tried again.
I'll have a more detailed look in the next few weeks when I have time to poke
at scdaemon logs, change configs etc.
> Kind regards,
>
> Gerd
--
Kind regards,
Antony
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
83 matches
Mail list logo
