mean 'uintptr_t'?
extern uintmax_t wcstoumax(const wchar_t * restrict nptr, wchar_t ** r...
^
/usr/include/i386/types.h:109:24: note: 'uintptr_t' declared here
typedef unsigned long uintptr_t;
^
Best regards,
Michael
sm
Am 05.10.2013 um 17:08 schrieb Werner Koch :
> On Sat, 5 Oct 2013 14:58, so...@dersonic.org said:
>
>> i just tried to compile the 2.0.22 version on Mac OS X 10.8.5 with XCode 5.0.
>
> This is known. See for example bug 1541. Sorry, I can't do anything
> about it until someone provides a tes
Hi, I am a new GPG user. (New to the command line, that is.) I know that if you
type "gpg" without any arguments in a command line it starts a primitive sort
of text editor where you can type a message that you later encrypt, sign, etc.
How do you tell the text editor when you are done with the
x27;...'
before 'pcsc_dword_t'
pcsc-wrapper.c:167: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...'
before 'pcsc_dword_t'
pcsc-wrapper.c:168: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...'
before 'pcsc_dword_t'
...
any suggestions?
cu
Michael
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
a good idea to do so?
Thanks a lot
Michael
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
ons import-clean --import pubring.tmp
Thanks a lot
Michael
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Hi,
On Mi, Oktober 31, 2007 00:05, oryann9 wrote:
> What causes your key-ring to become "dirty" or "fragmented?"
I have imported many keys which have lots of duplicated key as well as no
more valid uids.
Michael
___
Gnupg-u
ys created with that version be usable or
are they incompatible?
~ Michael.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFH9RacVlIM867aTsoRAuDNAJ45Jl/eGIXjLYNapPBFTifyjdvdvACgwgmJ
ZPQyNH3MNsna27vLHPHmP24=
=A4m3
-EN
where this
option is set. If there is anyone how has an idea to find this setting or
even has an idea why this option might be invalid - I'd be happy to here
about.
Thanks a lot
Michael
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://
Hello Charly,
thanks for your answer, I have attacht further information at the bottom of
this mail.
Am Mittwoch 01 Oktober 2008 13:13:35 schrieb Charly Avital:
> Michael wrote the following on 10/1/08 1:00 AM:
> > I am useing kde 4.1.1 and gpg 2.0.9 within kde there is a Program
>
failed
- dirmngr Configuration Check failed
All failed have a tool tip which says: gpgconf: invalid option -check-options
I have searched google so many times. i do not find a hint - hope you have one
:-)))
Michael
Am Donnerstag 02 Oktober 2008 01:01:03 schrieb John Clizbe:
> Michael wr
> project to port KDE to Windows. For Windows we use a snapshot of GnuPG.
>
> I know that a GnuPG release is long overdue; I hope to get a release
> candidate out in about 2 weeks.
I will unsubscribe from the list and post an update in case I encounter
problems. Is there an anounceli
ssions in this group, generally the quality of the
questions and the help has consistently been excellent.
Cheers for now,
Michael Kortvelyesy.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
I am trying to understand the new functionality added to release GnuPG 1.0.5
for Windows. The release noted states "This is a binary release for Windows".
What does this statement mean?
Thanks.
Michael Gordon
___
Gnupg-users mailing
I am not sure if this helps. (see attached)
Thanks,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Werner Koch [mailto:w...@gnupg.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 4:49 AM
To: Gordon, Michael
Cc: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Subject: Re: Libksba Release notes
On Wed, 3 Jun 2015 14:15, michael.gor
So the entry is unknown, correct?
-Original Message-
From: Werner Koch [mailto:w...@gnupg.org]
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 5:15 AM
To: Kristian Fiskerstrand
Cc: Gordon, Michael; gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Subject: Re: Libksba Release notes
On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 10:44, kristian.fiskerstr
gpg4win - thinking slowly - does this mean there is a skeleton, or better
project, to minimize what is needed from gnome to run the "modern" versions
of gnupg.
I do not want to install much - actually nothing - of a X11 "server"
environment on AIX. I prefer to work with X things as applications my
Does anyone know whether a declaration has ever been filed by anyone with the
French "L'Agence Nationale de la Sécurité des Systèmes d'information" (ANSSI)
for GnuPG version 2.0.16 to allow import of the software into France?
___
Gnupg-users mailing l
Does anyone know whether a declaration has ever been filed by anyone with the
French "L'Agence Nationale de la Sécurité des Systèmes d'information" (ANSSI)
for GnuPG version 2.0.16 to allow import of the software into France?
___
Gnupg-users mailing l
to preserve
the passphrase. Do you have any recommendations where I can have a passphrase
but still use it in an unattended fashion that is secure?
Michael W. Harman, MIT | Senior Application Architect, Information Services |
UHS of Delaware, Inc. | a subsidiary of Universal Health Service
, any solution
does not prevent someone from finding the passphrase if they really know how
and where to look. I'll hide the passphrase and then lock it down with security.
Thanks again, Mike
Michael W. Harman, MIT | Senior Application Architect, Information Services |
UHS of Delaware, Inc
intervention, but not let anyone else see or know where it was stored.
Mike
Michael W. Harman, MIT | Senior Application Architect, Information Services |
UHS of Delaware, Inc. | a subsidiary of Universal Health Services | Phone
610.768.3416
From: Brian Minton [mailto:br...@minton.name]
Sent
se that the Ubuntu community is a mess, and has
> nothing to do with top or bottom or front or rear posting.
Perhaps there should be an off-topic mailing list for all this stuff,
rather than cluttering up a perfectly usable gnupg mailing list.
- ---
Michael J. Englehorn
GPG Key
alk to my local scdaemon?
Cheers,
--
Michael Fladischer
Fladi.at
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
rsion
gpg (GnuPG) 2.1.19
libgcrypt 1.7.6
- Michael A. Smith
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
ep in mind that (to my knowledge) maryland does
allow the export of ecc software up to 256 bit if in the "interest of
national security". So why not exclude bit sizes smaller than 256 from
the very beginning.
regards
Michael
___
Gnupg-use
I wish you all had a Merry Christmas and will have a Happy New Year,
Michael Anders
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
est some minutes in understanding what asymmetric
cryptography is about, however. That should be well within the scope of
people with normal intelligence.
Without that very basic understanding, using GnuPG(or other public key
crypto) would be reckless nonsense anyways. Becoming a console wizar
ecurity:
https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/02/cryptanalysis_o.html
regards,
Michael Anders
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
GnuPG config files and tranferring to and fro windows and linux.
There seems to be a danger to mess up things using wrong editor
settings.
I don't know if hash preference information is additionally attached to
keys. I would guess it is not, it wouldn't make sense to
cally sound.
If you are interested in this topic, you may have fun listening into Dan
Bonehs great lectures on cryptography in coursera (for free).
https://www.coursera.org/courses?orderby=upcoming&search=cryptography
regards
Michael Anders
__
iberately and unnecessarily, which the
user has to trust. This pattern smells like a backdoor mechanism to
me.
I would outrighly reject to use such a card.
Cheers
Michael Anders
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
PGP, which thankworthily is usually more
or less hidden from the user anyways?
A good reason would help the complicated workings to stick with my
memory :-)
Why would we need more than one key and this hierarchy on top of it?
(Proper padding according to the standard to my knowledge removes even
the dan
ave been a
keylogger in place and security of the key is gone.
If you consider the NSA to be a benevolent organization, you might make
a distinction between security against criminals and security against
the NSA, but that is politics and not cryptography.
Cheers,
Mich
iven when it is not needed.
This seems reasonable to me.
regards
Michael Anders
(http://www.fh-wedel.de/~an/)
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
such thing as attrition of security by heavy usage of a public RSA or ECC key.
When it comes to system compromise leading to broken security. This is not kind of an aging process smoothly proceeding with time and eventually leading to death. They target you or they don't.
ch
of
cryptography in many contexts. There is no such thing as attrition of
security by heavy usage of a public RSA or ECC key.
When it comes to system compromise leading to broken security. This is
not kind of an aging process smoothly proceeding with time and
eventually leading to death. They target
>
> GPG encrypted data (using RSA) can be collected today and easily decrypted
> after 50-100 years using a quantum computer. See:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shor%27s_algorithm
Well let's see. Usually in a new technology, once you are really going
to apply it in the real world, new problems
On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 22:26 +0200, gnupg-users-requ...@gnupg.org wrote:
> If you want to run the temperature lower than the ambient
> temperature
> of the cosmos (3.2K), you have to add energy to run the heat pump --
> and the amount of energy required to run that heat pump will bring
> your
> nt-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> > Now where did you calculate that from?
>
> $dS = \frac{\delta Q}{T}$
>
> Second Law of Thermodynamics, which you just broke. Have a nice day.
>
The (cold) system where the calculation is done and the (hot) system the
result is transferred only ex
t keys, however, and that you could always
at least embed the exported subkey into a newly created parent key
structure and newly design whatever sub/super-key structure you like
around the exported key.
So unless there is convincing cryptographic reasoning about why you
cannot do something to the key
bad hard drive ?
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
ome improvement
compared to the publicly known methods to factor RSA moduli, expect such
improvement from other sources or else just want to push ECC.
(I like ECC -> google "open source elliptic curve cryptography".))
Cheers
Michael Anders
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
with me on this point, yet I have never heard a
convincing argument for the MAC in an asymmetric cipher.)
If you want authenticity, you have to have the message or cipher be
digitally signed by the sender.
For me the critcism of PGP is clearly unfair regarding this second
aspect.
Regards,
ork plugged into it. I wouldn't want to code it.
By the way - Green (rightfully) critizises PGP for bad defaults (e.g. using SHA1) yet he praises TextSecure which heavily relies on SHA1. This leaves me baffled.
Cheers,
Michael Anders
__
ely gone nuts and assumes others are
too stupid to implement strong crypto by themselves or else -and this
semms more probable to me- they go for a cheap short term advantage and
stage a theater to make others believe the software that was exported
would be secure while it is not...
regards
t you for defending your (the us) administration, yet in my
opinion both our administrations deserve some bashing once in a while
for excessive ignorance and/or sluggishness.
Cheers,
Michael Anders
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
nly.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works| network architect [
] m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/| ruby on rails[
pgpWBpGjrKqLy.pgp
Description: PGP signat
Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works| network architect [
] m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/| ruby on rails[
pgpxyAsFJlM_e.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
I remember something like this happening with shorewall or smoothwall
or something where this guy tried to get ownership of the opensource
so then everybody jumped ship and made ipcop. Some guy came on the new
mailing list and you would swear he was a wind-up, knew enough to keep
you on your toes b
Same question: who to submit bug too?
libgcrypt is not compiling (all other pre-requistes are done).
Thanks.
"../src/mpi.h", line 292.16: 1506-343 (S) Redeclaration of
_gcry_mpi_ec_set_mpi differs from previous declaration on line 423 of
"../src/gcrypt-int.h".
"../src/mpi.h", line 292.16: 1506-0
-
iconv_close D 40572 12
iconv_open D 40596 12
root@x064:[/data/prj/gnu/gcrypt/gnupg/gnupg-2.1.0]
Thank you for your assistance,
Michael
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
> Hello!
>
> The GnuPG Project is pleased to announce
gpgsm-gencert.sh.1'
yat2m: writing 'gpg-preset-passphrase.1'
yat2m: writing 'gpg-connect-agent.1'
yat2m: writing 'dirmngr-client.1'
yat2m: writing 'gpgparsemail.1'
yat2m: writing 'symcryptrun.1'
yat2m: writing 'gpg-zip.1'
asschk.c: In func
what does the test t-exeche do, besides spin on the processor (after saying
PASS: t-zb32
max. file descriptors: 2147483647
Michael
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 16:30, aixto...@gmail.com said:
>
> > However, configure is reporting - i
ursive] Error 1
make: *** [all] Error 2
/opt/bin/make returned an error
There may be more messages (to come), but this is where it stops for now.
Michael
p.s. My last note was only to the list. Did it show up? (I shall go
register - now while I think of it!)
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:51 PM, We
Hello,
I am running "make check" and the process seems to stop after this line to
stdout
...
CERT lookup on 'simon.josefsson.org'
Key found (33162 bytes)
PASS: t-dns-cert
PASS: t-mapstrings
PASS: t-zb32
max. file descriptors: 2147483647
Is this perhaps a bug - at least for the test logic - becaus
rintf(stderr,"OPEN_MAX:\tmax_fds:%10d\n", max_fds);
+#endif
#endif
- if (max_fds == -1)
-max_fds = 256; /* Arbitrary limit. */
+max_fds = (max_fds > 256) ? 256 : max_fds;
+#if 0
+fprintf(stderr,"return:\t\tmax_fds:%10d\n", max_fds);
+#endif
return max_fds;
}
I sent a possible patch. the value returned in rl is MAX_INT32, not -1.
not sure if looking for the smallest value is what get max fds should be
doing though.
On Dec 3, 2014 9:20 PM, "Werner Koch" wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Dec 2014 11:40, aixto...@gmail.com said:
>
> > max. file descriptors: 214748364
/sys/time.h:#define __NUM_ENTRIES (FD_SETSIZE/__NFDBITS+1)
Again, this is NOT a bug-report. I have never seen gnupg 2.0 (so maybe it
is all GUI related, when all I am really interested in is security
abilities).
Thank your for your time.
Michael
p.s. please forgive the cross post to @devel - no
ymore
____
Michael Griffiths - IT Systems Administrator
Direct dial: +44 (0) 113 2763422 | Office: +44 (0) 113 2710033 - Ext:
203 | Mobile: +44 (0) 788 1957504
Address: Arc House | Middleton Grove| Beeston | Leeds | LS11 5BX | UK
Email: michael.griffi...@arc-int
Yes, and I'm sure that the government's (in any country) will word these
cases in there own favour and make anyone who uses this technology look
like the bad guys
____
Michael
fence.
____
Michael Griffiths - IT Systems Administrator
Direct dial: +44 (0) 113 2763422 | Office: +44 (0) 113 2710033 - Ext:
203 | Mobile: +44 (0) 788 1957504
Address: Arc House | Middleton Grove| Beeston | Leeds | LS11 5BX | UK
Email: michael.griffi...@arc-intl.com
Please con
gards,
____
Michael Griffiths - IT Systems Administrator
Direct dial: +44 (0) 113 2763422 | Office: +44 (0) 113 2710033 - Ext:
203 | Mobile: +44 (0) 788 1957504
Address: Arc House | Middleton Grove| Beeston | Leeds | LS11 5BX | UK
Email: michael.griffi...@arc-int
Sorry I forgot to actually answer your question.
It will appear under the add/remove programs. For windows it will most
likely be named "GnuPG for windows"
____
Michael Griffiths - IT Systems Administrator
Direct dial: +44 (0) 113 2763422 | Office: +
access to that key and know where it can find it.
Best wishes
Michael
--
Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) [] (http://fsfe.org)
Treten Sie der Fellowship bei! [][][]
(http://fellowship.fsfe.org/join?ref=mkesper)
Ihre Spende ermöglicht unsere Arbeit! || (http://fsfe.org/donate)
I have been using PGP on Windows for some time, and am now trying to
move to Fedora. That implies a move to GPG, which is fine, but I want
to have access to my PGP files without converting every single one. I
imported my secret keys, could not get a confirmation for importing
public keys.
ile
Add file to the current list of keyrings. (...)
If the intent is to use the specified keyring alone, use --keyring
along with --no-default-keyring.
HTH.
Cheers,
Michael
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
htt
I love gpg and use it quite often. Do you know if there is an
application that can use gpg on the iOS platform either as an app or
as a jail broken feature?
Thank you, Michael Dansie
-PGP Public Key-
http://goo.gl/Na8FI
___
Gnupg-users mailing
gt; is there a specific port number that is used? I just want to make sure
> my firewall is setup correctly. Presently I have it setup to allow any
> port # for those URLs.
I think it's the Horowitz Keyserver Protocol (hkp) which typically
uses port 11371 (see [1]).
[1] http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers
Michael
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
gt; that you don't have to supply them on the command line every time.
>
I guess --ask-sig-expire and --default-sig-expire is what you probably
want to use, which you can define in your config, too.
--
------
eyword 'data' in 'data signature' when I
looked through the manpage. So dkg was right with --ask-cert-expire,
which prompts for an expiration date of the signature you're going to
perform.
Michael
--
> today.
>
Try using --keyring instead of -keyring.
Regards,
Michael
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
point taken. Randomness can be regenerated or reseeded.
Which /form/ of randomness you get will be taken from different
sources.
That's why it actually /asks/ you to hit a few random keys and move the
mouse about during the generation of the random "pool" that gpg uses
when generating it's key-pa
s listing:
G83-6744LUAGB-2 -> EMV 2000 Level 1
G83-6744LUZGB-2 -> EMV 2000 Level 1, Common Criteria EAL 3+
HTH.
Cheers,
Michael
[1] http://www.cherry.de/cid/b2b_keyboards_SmartBoard_G83-6744.htm?
--
-
Michael Fladerer
Outlook Privacy Plugin
A simple OpenPGP encryption plugin for Outlook 2010.
http://code.google.com/p/outlook-privacy-plugin/
*About*
Outlook Privacy Plugin is a security extension for Outlook 2010. It
enables Outlook 2010 to send and receive email messages that are
encrypted and/or signed wi
hello,
I'm trying to understand the principals and benefits of using pgp/gpg
I think I understand that I send the part of my key that is public to
somebody and they use that key to encrypt a message which only I can
decypher.
So what if somebody uses my public key to send me a message purporting
to
I don't know why procmail finds this list more elusive than any other.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
what is the reasoning for attaching the key ID to the end of the
fingerprint string ?
regards
mick
--
keyID: 0x4BFEBB31
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On Wed, May 23, 2012 5:18 pm, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> I have a draft version of nine frequently asked questions ready for
> community review:
>
> http://keyservers.org/gnupgfaq.xhtml
for me the first should always be "what is gnupg ?"
regards
mick
--
keyID: 0x4BFEBB31
_
>> mwood@mhw ~ $ dir /usr/bin/gpg*
^^^
--
keyID: 0x4BFEBB31
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On Thu, June 7, 2012 11:27 am, Werner Koch wrote:
> If you look at my OpenPGP mail header you will be pointed to a
> âfingerâ
> address - enter it into your web browser (in case you don't know what
> finger is) and you will see
I see that it would be handy to have this stuff in the header wh
On Sat, June 9, 2012 10:28 am, Mark Rousell wrote:
> On 07/06/2012 11:27, Werner Koch wrote:
>> On Wed, 6 Jun 2012 21:54, pe...@digitalbrains.com said:
>>
>> If you look at my OpenPGP mail header you will be pointed to a finger
>> address - enter it into your web browser (in case you don't know
On Sat, June 9, 2012 2:29 pm, Mark Rousell wrote:
>> What types of processes are forbidden by DreamHost?
>> [deletia]
>
> Err.. sorry, not following you. :-) Who is using Dreamhost and what has
> it got to do with the finger protocol? Werner doesn't seem to be using
> Dreamhost for what it's wor
On Mon, June 11, 2012 4:11 pm, Sam Smith wrote:
>
> I tried every GUI I could find for GPG over the past 2 years. My absolute
> favorite is GNU Privacy Assistant (GPA).
>
> I do believe I have tried every GUI option there is for Windows and
> Ubuntu. Originally, I couldn't find anything I liked on
Is that a
problem with an older GnuPG variant? I wouldn't think that's the issue.
What questions can I ask them which will help shed light on this situation? Is
it possible that I'm doing something wrong? I've created a test account with
its ow
On Jun 18, 2012, at 6:38 PM, Hauke Laging wrote:
> Am Mo 18.06.2012, 15:37:27 schrieb Michael Hannemann:
>
>> I'm having trouble sending an encrypted file to a collaborator -- even
>> though they've sent me files that I've been able to decrypt.
>
>
On Jun 19, 2012, at 1:50 AM, Hauke Laging wrote:
> Am Di 19.06.2012, 01:03:26 schrieb Michael Hannemann:
>
>> pub:f:1024:17:xx--TpTpTpTp:1999-04-08:::-:[my collaborator]::scaESCA:
>> sub:f:2048:16:xx--TsTsTsTs:1999-04-08::e:
>
> This seems not to leave any
On Mon, June 25, 2012 5:00 pm, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> On 06/25/2012 11:44 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
>>> cracking the symmetric encryption used to protect the private key is
>>> comparable to the problem of cracking an encrypted message's session
>>> key.
>>
>> No, it is not. The entropy in a sess
Hello,
I'm the maintainer of a PHP package that integrates with GnuPG
(https://github.com/gauthierm/Crypt_GPG)
The package is used on a website to allow decrypting stored messages.
This is accomplished using the --status-fd and --command-fd options of
GnuPG, allowing the passing of passphras
> yyy yyy at yyy.id.lv
> Thu Aug 30 12:48:45 CEST 2012
>
>> As of GnuPGv2, the --command-fd method of passing passphrases no longer
>> seems to work. Is there an alternative I can use so that the pin entry
>> interface is still a webpage?
>>
>> Please let me know what I can use to handle pin-entry
ificates (root and signed certificate) with
gpgsm --import but with no effect. Also reboots, card reader
disconnection, restart of thunderbird in every possible combination did
not work.
What am I doing wrong?
Thanks and regards,
Michael
___
Gnupg-
thout scute? But then the key is extractable from the card if one knows
the PIN!?
> We have tested Scute only with Firefox and thus you may may have
> problems if you use it for mail. Should be easy to fix, though.
I'll try out and report asap.
or my personal account, since that was several
inattentive years ago, and I no longer know the passphrase. (That's pretty
much hopeless, right?)
Michael
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
Gnupg-users m
have to enter a passphrase...
Do you see any way to get the embedded file name for variables?
TIA
Michael
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
I forgot to mention the GNUPG version: It's 1.4.13
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
--> [GNUPG:] PLAINTEXT 62 1368014323 ~20130508135842.ff0fcb7.tmp.7z
MANY MANY THANKS, Peter.
Best regards
Michael
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Hello.
Recently I upgraded a Debian machine from squeeze to wheezy,
which lead to upgrading gnupg from 1.4.10 to 1.4.12. And
immediately noticed that many automated tools I used stopped
working, refusing to encrypt with the error indicated in the
subject.
$ gpg --batch -q --encrypt --recipient r
key the OP wants, since
> it
> complains about key 468E35BC having insufficient validity.
>
> Michael, what does --edit-key rconf tell you about key validity?
It says "validity: unknown"
pub 1024R/DC42DA4C created: 2005-01-27 expires: never usage: SC
21.06.2013 14:00, Henry Hertz Hobbit wrote:
> On 06/21/2013 07:50 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> Recently I upgraded a Debian machine from squeeze to wheezy,
>> which lead to upgrading gnupg from 1.4.10 to 1.4.12. And
>> immediately noticed that ma
22.06.2013 11:56, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> On 21/06/13 12:34, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> It says "validity: unknown"
>
> I just thought of something. If for some reason your /own/ key is no longer
> trusted, you can make signatures all day but it won't increase va
1 - 100 of 277 matches
Mail list logo
