?
Thanks in advance,
Mark.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
ut
If the option existed, I'd imagine this is how I would do it:
# gpg --batch --yes --trust-level 5 --edit-key "swrepo server" trust quit
or perhaps:
# gpg --trust-key "swrepo server" 5
but of course I've made those o
> On Fri 23/07/10 3:51 PM , Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net sent:
I need to be able to ultimately trust a public key in batch mode, that I
have downloaded
automatically with wget from an internal server over HTTPS.
>>>
>>> I think that you might be confusing "trust" with
On Mon 26/07/10 9:01 AM , m...@proseconsulting.co.uk sent:
> Perfect, that'll do me just fine! I've scripted this suggestion:
>
> #!/bin/ksh
> #
> # Set trust level for a given GPG key
> #
> AWK=/bin/gawk
> [ -x /bin/nawk ] && AWK=/bin/nawk
>
> [ $# -ne 2 ] && echo "Syntax: $0 key trust-level"
for all scripts. The standard output is only
> for humans.
Good spot. Amended script attached. I hope others find it useful.
Best regards,
Mark Bannister.
set-gpg-trust
Description: Binary data
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
$2"
> >
> > Please use --with-colons for all scripts. The standard output is only
> > for humans.
>
> Good spot. Amended script attached. I hope others find it useful.
> Best regards,
> Mark Bannister.
Checking the mailing list archive, it seems my attached script
Damien,
Thanks for the explanation on the keygrips. That makes sense why it is
some "random" set of characters. I understand (I think) it is acting
like a place marker but still trying to understand the why part.
I guess I need to export my keys to make it accessible to other apps
that use PGP
Robert,
Thanks for the explantion of the new public key format. If I understand
it correctly, the old system was like a flat file an this new one is
more like an indexed database that allows faster lookups.
On 1/7/2020 12:37 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> I'm still a bit confused on the changes i
I was wondering what effect changing the passphrase has on the keys. Not
only the keygrip file but also on the exported copy of it that can be
used with other programs. If you change the passphrase, do you need to
re-backup those keygrip files and re-export those keys again?
Thanks
Thanks for the reply... Probably safer to back them up again just in
case I forget it, especially since I have another program that uses PGP
to encrypt/decrypt archives.
On 1/26/2020 5:56 PM, Ángel wrote:
> On 2020-01-17 at 06:47 -0700, Mark wrote:
>> I was wondering what effect cha
I know the palindrome day was yesterday (although the article missed
several others in the 21st century). I am curious on how you were able
to create a key with a certain fingerprint.
On 2/2/2020 2:41 PM, Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote:
>
>> Stefan Claas v
Is there anyway to revoke an OLD LOST PGP key? I no longer have either
the public or private keys but can find the KeyID. I'm guessing not but
figured I'd ask just in case.
Thanks
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.or
t;
> -C
>
> On 2/5/2020 3:59 PM, Mark wrote:
>> Is there anyway to revoke an OLD LOST PGP key? I no longer have either
>> the public or private keys but can find the KeyID. I'm guessing not but
>> figured I'd ask just in case.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
37 PM, Damien Goutte-Gattat wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 03:59:01PM -0700, Mark wrote:
>> Is there anyway to revoke an OLD LOST PGP key? I no longer have either
>> the public or private keys but can find the KeyID. I'm guessing not but
>> figured I'd ask just in case.
I
was just thinking if I could revoke them I would but it doesn't look
like that is possible.
On 2/5/2020 4:38 PM, Ralph Seichter via Gnupg-users wrote:
> * Mark:
>
>> Is there anyway to revoke an OLD LOST PGP key? I no longer have either
>> the public or private keys but can
didn't
think so, but figured I'd just in case.
I remember the old FidoNet days. I was involved with QWK mail reader way
back then.
On 2/6/2020 9:50 AM, Shawn K. Quinn via Gnupg-users wrote:
> On 2/6/20 09:41, Mark wrote:
>> These were keys created in the 90s on probably 3 computers
I'm trying to understand the differences in strength between an RSA key
and an elliptical one such ed25519 with cv25519. I know with RSA it is
pretty easy to "gauge" the strength 1024 vs 2048 vs 4096.
I could not really find anything to say how strong these elliptical keys
are and how they compar
Kinda of a stupid question here about updating your keys. I'm curious as
to what changes would require you to re-upload it to a keyserver.
I assume updating the passphrase would not because that is tied to the
private key but does it change anything in the public key where that
might be require
I know this may be a subjective question but what is the best keyserver
to use? I use GPG4Win with the Enigmail plugin for Thunderbird. The
keyservers listed in Enigmail are:
vks://keys.openpgp.org, hkps://hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net,
hkps://pgp.mit.edu
The keyserver that is used in Kelopatra
I'm just curious as to what this "GNU" way is? I assume you would just a
non identifiable email address and then either leave your name blank,
incomplete, or just plain incorrect.
Is there another way I am missing?
Thanks
On 5/16/2020 8:56 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> So, when you like to comm
Thanks I will update it and make sure both Kleopatra and Enigmail are
using the same one so they are "on the same page"
On 5/15/2020 11:55 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-05-15 at 16:52 -0700, Mark wrote:
>> I know this may be a subjective question but what is the best
users wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2020, at 5:15 PM, Mark wrote:
>> I'm trying to understand the differences in strength between an RSA key
>> and an elliptical one such ed25519 with cv25519. I know with RSA it is
>> pretty easy to "gauge" the strength 1024 vs 2048 vs 4096
Just to test this out I tried creating a new key in Kleopatra with no
name and then with just a single name and it would not let me do it. It
had to have a first and at least a last initial.
On 5/19/2020 7:29 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> With the freeform approach, when I would have to use (aut
It must be... With all the talk of "anonymous" keys I wanted to see if I
could create one with Kleopatra, especially since it says optional for
name.
On 5/20/2020 12:27 AM, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
>> On 20 May 2020, at 06:32, Mark wrote:
>>
>> Just to test this out I
Did a bit more experimenting with it. You can have something only in
the first name field but it has to be a minimum of 5 characters and the
first one must be a letter. ..
On 5/20/2020 3:16 PM, Mark wrote:
> It must be... With all the talk of "anonymous" keys I wanted to see if I
&
kg is but have seen those initials mentioned a few
times.
On 5/21/2020 7:30 AM, Stefan Claas wrote:
> Mark wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Did a bit more experimenting with it. You can have something only in
>> the first name field but it has to be a minimum of 5 characters and
>> the first
That is very true. I have a friend whose first name is M'Lou and she's
had all kinds of issues when systems freak out over her first name.
On 5/21/2020 6:48 AM, Mark H. Wood via Gnupg-users wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 03:27:28PM -0700, Mark wrote:
>> Did a bit more ex
I'm sure this is a pretty stupid question but I'm trying to figure out
which files I need to backup to safeguard my keys. All the docs I have
seen so far are for the older versions of GNUPG before it changed the
format of the keys.
Anyway what files (and/or folders) should I be backing up to a
I have yet to try it but it sounds like a good idea. Does it run under
Windows 10?
On 5/24/2020 9:18 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> But using Sherpa is probably a good bet.
> Good Lord, it's been a while since I wrote that. The Windows MSI
> installer should still work, though. If there's intere
that Sherpa program
On 5/24/2020 5:52 AM, Damien Goutte-Gattat wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 09:35:54PM -0700, Mark wrote:
>> I'm sure this is a pretty stupid question
>
> No, it’s not.
>
>
>> I'm trying to figure out which files I need to backup to safe
Interesting points... I'm not sure I have all those files such as the
TOFU (have to actually read more about it). I think if all the
important files are stored in an encrypted container, they should be
pretty secure.
On 5/24/2020 9:16 AM, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 24/05/2020 16:05, Felix
I think that could be addressed if all those files and directories are
stored within an encrypted archive (whatever your favorite is)
On 5/24/2020 7:05 AM, Felix Finch wrote:
> On 20200524, Damien Goutte-Gattat via Gnupg-users wrote:
>> On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 09:35:54PM -0700, M
Good point, unless you can use some other passwordless authentication.
On 5/24/2020 10:44 AM, Felix Finch wrote:
> On 20200524, Mark wrote:
>> I think that could be addressed if all those files and directories are
>> stored within an encrypted archive (whatever your favorite is)
&g
On 24/05/2020 19:11, Mark wrote:
>> I think if all the important files are stored in an encrypted
>> container, they should be pretty secure.
> Just watch out for the catch-22 of "I lost my hard drive, let me restore
> from that encrypted container. Hmmm, my only backup of my
Sorry misspoke.. I should've said put those files you listed in an
encrypted archive. I will grab Sherpa later and see how it works.
Thanks
On 5/24/2020 12:57 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> I was thinking along the lines of backing up that entire directory into
>> an encrypted 7z file and then j
I forgot to mention there are 2 files in that gnupg directory that I'm
not sure the purpose of. I know private keys are stored in a directory
called private-keys-v1.d and public keys are stored in pubring.kbx. I do
have a file called PAPubring.gpg and PAsecring.gpg. They are only 111
and 113 bytes
With the posts of backing up files and anonymous private keys it got me
thinking. Is there a mechanism in place that protects (encrypts) a
public keyring? They can be thought of as sort of an address book or
contact list and with some mail providers encrypting contacts I wondered
if such a thing ex
I'd like to see it updated. I think it would be useful utility to have.
On 5/25/2020 2:49 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> Having only heard of it just now, I was surprised it's not included in
>> Debian,
>> until I saw the word of caution and lack of commit history.
> The word of caution is becaus
perfect system. Passwords are easy to change
but also easy to forget. Biometrics are hard to "lose" but also hard to
change.
On 5/25/2020 12:36 AM, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> On 24/05/2020 21:39, Mark wrote:
>> I know there are other options maybe even some that use
>> biometrics to d
That is what I had figured. Like I said I was just bored and the though
popped in my head if that was something ever discussed.
On 5/25/2020 12:06 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> Obviously I know you can install it an encrypted volume (depending on
>> your OS) but was curious if the program or eve
There are 2 files in that gnupg directory that I'm not sure the purpose
of. I know private keys are stored in a directory called
private-keys-v1.d and public keys are stored in pubring.kbx.
I have a file called PAPubring.gpg (111 bytes) and PAsecring.gpg (113
bytes) I'm guessing they are too small
One of the potential problems I can see is multiple key rings. which I
have just recently discovered in my own setup. I have the "standard" key
rings that GPG4Win/Enigmail use and then I discovered 2 unknown files in
my gnupg directory. PAPubring.gpg and PAsecring.gpg. I eventually
deduced they cam
So then do you have multiple pairs of key rings? One pair for TB78 and
its built in PGP and another pair as part of GNUPG?
If so how do you keep them synchronized?
On 5/30/2020 9:17 AM, Patrick Brunschwig wrote:
> Robert J. Hansen wrote on 30.05.2020 01:07:
>>> If TB 78 is going to have native su
Thanks
On 5/30/2020 12:57 PM, Patrick Brunschwig wrote:
> Mark wrote on 30.05.2020 20:54:
>> So then do you have multiple pairs of key rings? One pair for TB78 and
>> its built in PGP and another pair as part of GNUPG?
> No exactly. You have your secret keys with GnuPG, and your p
That is what I see happening too. When you start having multiple key
stores, which one contains the "correct" keys? I saw that happening in
just my very limited usage where another program has its own key rings...
On 5/31/2020 1:28 AM, Andreas Boehlk Computer-Service wrote:
> Hell
rick Brunschwig wrote:
> Mark wrote on 31.05.2020 01:28:
>> Doesn't TB also need your secret keys to decrypt messages?
> With smartcard support via GnuPG, all secret key operations are handled
> by GnuPG, and all public key operations are handled by TB (Note: the
> standard ca
I was thinking about getting an app called iPGMail for iPhone/iPad to
use PGP on them. From my very limited experience it looks like it might
be a good choice as well.
On 8/10/2020 8:49 AM, Stefan Claas wrote:
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Why use PGP on your phone if you carry a whole lapt
For example, in this message from Ryan, Enigmail says it has a bad
signature. I think that could be an issue too with it's adoption.
On 8/12/2020 11:29 AM, Ryan McGinnis via Gnupg-users wrote:
> The reasons to abandon PGP for secure communications have been
> accepted in the security community for
I use GPG4Win and I've noticed that "hkp://keys.gnupg.net" is not
working right. I was not getting any hits back when searching with
Kleopatra and then I tried to ping that server which returned host not
found. So I'm also interested if there is a better choice.
On 9/17/2020 1:57 PM, Martin wrot
lly
a server anymore to search it makes sense.
I'm not familiar with the attack on it and by who so will have to google
it and see if I can learn more.
On 9/18/2020 8:32 AM, Phil Pennock wrote:
> On 2020-09-18 at 08:06 -0700, Mark wrote:
>> I use GPG4Win and I've noticed that "
I'm the one that asked the original question in regards to GPG4Win. I
know with the latest version the default is "hkp://keys.gnupg.net"
On 9/20/2020 4:58 AM, MFPA via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> On Saturday 19 September 2020 at 7:34:13 PM, in
> , Phil
> Pennock via Gnupg-users wrote:-
>
>
>> Th
Back in the old days of the internet there was ISP called Primenet (no
longer around) that did give static IPs. I had one at that time.
Nowadays it seems like only possible with business accounts at at least
with Cox, those are 2-3x the cost of residential ones. So unless you
want to spend the coi
Not to ask a stupid question but how can you tell which algorithm your
keys are using and if using SHA1 update them to a more secure one?
Thanks,
On 11/17/2020 4:13 PM, Phil Pennock via Gnupg-users wrote:
The current state of SHA1 is "dangerously exposed, you should be
hurrying for the exits,
? like this,
> maybe, more consistent and solid?
Sorry, this is pretty serious (though accessible) crypto - aesthetics
has never really been high during development.
HTH (consider it a bump if nothing else)
Mark
--
http://www.evilcomputing.net
___
Gnupg-user
/should/ work.
HTH
Mark
--
http://www.evilcomputing.net
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
I have a pass phrase that contains an exclamation mark (!). I can decrypt fine
manually, however when I try to put this into a batch file, and pipe the the
pass phrase to the gpg command to decrypt the file, it doesn't work. Could the
exclamation mark be causing the problem? Also, is th
From: Mark Walter
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 1:17 PM
To: 'gnupg-users@gnupg.org'
Subject: Problem with PassPhrase in Batch.
I have a pass phrase that contains an exclamation mark (!). I can decrypt fine
manually, however when I try to put this into a batch file, and pipe the
g here. This used to not be an issue.
This is Windows Server 2012.
Thanks in advance
Mark Walter
Business to Business Data Integration Specialist
Certified IBM System i Specialist
Paragon Consulting Services, Inc.
mwal...@paragon-csi.com
No, Only the Private keys show up. What I tried to create and test was a public
key to give to a partner for encrypting files sent to us.
Thanks.
Mark Walter
Business to Business Data Integration Specialist
Certified IBM System i Specialist
Paragon Consulting Services, Inc.
mwal...@paragon
Thanks so much for the help everyone. I believe I have this working as I need
it.
Mark Walter
Business to Business Data Integration Specialist
Certified IBM System i Specialist
Paragon Consulting Services, Inc.
mwal...@paragon-csi.com
717-764-7909 ext. 20
-Original Message-
From
Smells like something to do with IPv6
On 14 May 2015 at 12:41, Daniel Bomar wrote:
> I'm using Arch Linux and running a custom kernel (version 4.0.2) and
> I'm unable to use the --refresh-keys function. I know the kernel is
> the problem because when I reboot into the ARCH distribution kernel
>
demic and
> at times relies on unsourced facts and opinions. And sure enough,
> some of the theories sound almost conspiratorial. Still, the paper
> does a good job of evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of the
> NSA's highly unexpected abandonment of ECC in a post
Any suggestions on which ubuntu version (trusty, xenial, etc . . . ) to
install (chroot) for using GnuPG?
And which desktop interface (xfce4, lxde, gnome, etc . . .) to go with?
And finally -- what about a GUI frontend (Seahorse, Kleopatra, etc . . . )
to use.
HP Chromebook 14 G4, preparing to r
ser. (I think the
Administrators group is only added if an administrator has used Windows
Explorer to look in the user's home folder hierarchy).
--
Mark Rousell
PGP public key: http://www.signal100.com/markr/pgp
Key ID: C9C5C162
___
Gnupg
oved to our own
smartcards (the old AVR based 1k RSA keys) using a smartcards was
actually usable (<100ms). You don't want to wait 10 seconds to decrypt
a thread of 10 mails just to notice that it was only CCed office
chitchat.
Kind regards, Mark
--
m...@it-infrastrukturen.org
http://rsync
iOS and Androif application without source code and
evenn such important details like the used encryption.
Don't trust closed source software products!
regards, Mark
--
m...@it-infrastrukturen.org
http://rsync.it-infrastrukturen.org
http://git.it
as experimental software. In fact, I wrote it just to learn
about the curve and see how it works.
Beside some differences it works like GNUPG. So, if you already know how
to use gpg, you'll feel almost home.
# ---
Kind regards, Mark
--
m...@it-infrastrukturen.org
http://rsync.it
backdoors in
the firmware (BIOS, closed source drivers etc).
Kind regards, Mark
--
m...@it-infrastrukturen.org
http://rsync.it-infrastrukturen.org
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
sequence of data to them can turn them in the "debug
or whatever" mode.
Hacking smartcards is more complicated but possible.
BTW: there is no video at:
http://achtbaan.nikhef.nl/events/OHM/video/d2-t1-13-20130801-2300-hard_disks_more_than_just_block_devices-sprite_tm.m4v
ublic domain code once again appears
<http://bxr.su/OpenBSD/usr.bin/signify/mod_ed25519.c> in the base tree
of OpenBSD, only a few weeks after some other DJB inventions made it
into the nearby OpenSSH
<http://it.slashdot.org/story/13/12/11/173213/openssh-has-a-new-cipher-chacha20-poly13
from the same drawbacks that TC does
(e.g. lack of GPT support).
--
Mark Rousell
PGP public key: http://www.signal100.com/markr/pgp
Key ID: C9C5C162
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On 31/05/2014 06:57, Faramir wrote:
> El 30-05-2014 20:21, Mark Rousell escribió:
> ...
>> Note that there is also DiskCryptor for open source full disk
>> encryption on Windows. See http://diskcryptor.com. I've not tested
>> it but it does seem to work, alth
On 31/05/2014 08:42, Johan Wevers wrote:
> On 31-05-2014 8:35, Mark Rousell wrote:
>
>> All that said, Free OTFE might be a good basis on which to continue
>> development if the licence terms of TrueCrypt 7.1a turn out to be too
>> restrictive to allow a successful
adly). It will give people the warm and fuzzies because it's there but
few people who use Gmail will know why it's there or how to use it or
bother to use it.
--
Mark Rousell
PGP public key: http://www.signal100.com/markr/pgp
Key ID: C9C5C162
___
On 17/06/2014 15:55, ved...@nym.hush.com wrote:
> [...]
> Maybe an armored robotic #D Gnu might be a consideration.
Oh yes, excellent idea. :-)
--
Mark Rousell
PGP public key: http://www.signal100.com/markr/pgp
Key ID: C9C5C162
___
On 17/06/2014 18:47, Mick Crane wrote:
>
>
>> On 17 Jun 2014, at 17:53, Mark Rousell wrote:
>>
>>> On 17/06/2014 15:55, ved...@nym.hush.com wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> Maybe an armored robotic #D Gnu might be a consideration.
>>
>> Oh y
s of critical importance to
liberty. By choosing to believe that privacy (or specifically privacy of
information) is a concept that has "fade"ed you are playing into the
hands of those who would wish to forcefully strip us all of privacy,
whether we like or or not. That would be a mistake, I
involves some extent of information
sharing, and always has, but that doesn't mean that privacy (and all the
nuanced concepts that are contained within that word) has somehow
evaporated the first time you communicate with someone, or travel
somewhere, etc.
--
Mark Rousell
PGP public key: h
still does not mean that we need to share more than we want or
need to where we have a choice, and we still do have lots of choices in
this matter (especially in the context of my earlier message).
--
Mark Rousell
PGP public key: http://www.signal100.com/markr/pgp
Key ID: C9C5C162
ocks come, but nobody's
> listening to me. I'm getting in the way of the latest special about the
> Kardashians, you see...
I know what you mean. I have faith in the longer run but I'm not going
to like the process that we end up going through to get there because
people are not taking the threat seriously now, whilst there is still
time to prevent the worst.
--
Mark Rousell
PGP public key: http://www.signal100.com/markr/pgp
Key ID: C9C5C162
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
ors more your thing, but you took it to the
> gas station and filled 'er up
> or you got breakfast at the deli before your meeting ?
I think you are conflating separate things with questions like these.
See Mark H Wood's comment above:
"It was never possible
On 29/08/2014 09:29, Samir Nassar wrote:
> It is safe to say this thread has moved way off topic from being about using
> gnupg.
>
> Samir
Yes. My apologies for my part in taking it off-topic.
--
Mark Rousell
PGP public key: http://www.signal100.com/markr/pgp
Key
gt; or you got breakfast at the deli before your meeting ?
I think you are conflating separate things with questions like these.
See Mark H Wood's comment above:
"It was never possible to live in perfect anonymity. You can't
participate in society and be invisible to i
HKPS
What was the underlying problem here? GnuPG needs to be built with
GnuTLS support enabled or something?
Mark
>
> --
> Samir Nassar
> sa...@samirnassar.com
> https://samirnassar.com
> PGP Fingerprint: EE76 B39E 0778 8F95 F796 B044 FE67 9A90 8E99 7AB2
___
On 1 January 2015 at 10:19, Doug Barton wrote:
> The death of IPsec has been greatly exaggerated:
>
> https://nohats.ca/wordpress/blog/2014/12/29/dont-stop-using-ipsec-just-yet/
And the “ssh is broken” remark strikes me as a little dramatic, too.
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Allen Schultz wrote:
> I think I figured ot what is acting as the gpg-agent in this newer
> install. Since they dropped WinPT and added Kleopatra, the interface
> changed to this (to me) annoying pinentry.exe asking for my passphrase.
> I think I will
Anyone know if it's possible to generate a subkey for signing purposes
via batch operations or a script? I can't seem to find anything that
references a way to do that.
Mark
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists
trying (60 sec). I'm pretty sure this
happens before main().
Any easy example is tests/basic.c from libgcrypt-1.4.6.
I would be grateful for some insights into this problem or hints about
how to do further troubleshooting.
regards,
Mark
DNS round robin pool?
The gnupg user experience is really bad otherwise. If you are lucky to
hit the one that works everything is fine, but two out of three times
you hit a bad one and things just stall and hang for ages.
Thanks,
Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
I just thought the following might be helpful for Windows users of GnuPG
1.x.
I had been running 1.4.10 on Windows for some time and I thought it was
time I checked for an upgrade so I visited
http://www.gnupg.org/download/ to see if there was a new version. I
found that 1.4.11 was available but t
ny others the freedom to discuss software
alternatives on a public mailing list? And so, in the end, limit the
freedom of everybody to chose whatever he or she likes best, be it
proprietary or not? That doesn't seem to fit together completely, but
this is obviously only my
led intolerant and
freedom-of-choice-denying - and rightfully so. IMHO, not an example I
would want to follow.
Anyways, since I'm not going to try to change those rules and the whole
thing is going off-topic fast, I guess I'll rest my case now.
Kind regards,
Mark
___
Am 17.11.2011 21:31, schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
> On 11/17/2011 2:39 PM, Mark Kirchner wrote:
>> But please let me re-phrase: Those rules seem to deny people the
>> freedom to discuss software alternatives on a public mailing list?
>
> If this was a public mailing list, I
On 07/06/2012 11:27, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jun 2012 21:54, pe...@digitalbrains.com said:
>
> If you look at my OpenPGP mail header you will be pointed to a “finger”
> address - enter it into your web browser (in case you don't know what
> finger is) and you will see
Just as an aside, I
On 09/06/2012 12:05, michael crane wrote:
>
> On Sat, June 9, 2012 10:28 am, Mark Rousell wrote:
>> On 07/06/2012 11:27, Werner Koch wrote:
>>> On Wed, 6 Jun 2012 21:54, pe...@digitalbrains.com said:
>>>
>>> If you look at my OpenPGP mail header you wi
On 10/06/2012 15:03, Sam Smith wrote:
> I wasn't going to say anything, but I had no idea what Mr. Koch was
> talking about with that "finger" stuff. I studied his email and the
> email header looking for clues. Couldn't decipher what he meant.
>
>> Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2012 10:28:04 +0100
>> From: ma
echo MyPasword1432!|"C:\Program Files\GNU\GnuPG\gpg2.exe" --passphrase-fd
0 --homedir "C:\Users\Mark\AppData\Roaming\gnupg" -r "ABC Limited" -o
"C:\Users\Mark\Desktop\test-sign-done.txt.gpg" -e --sign
"C:\Users\Mark\Desktop\test-sign.txt"
Doe
OK. You're welcome.
- Original Message -
From: "John Morris"
To: "MarkB123"
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2012 4:51 PM
Subject: Re: Newbie: Commandline still prompting for passphrase?
On 09/21/2012 07:30 PM, MarkB123 wrote:
Thanks. I was able to get it to work using the --batc
Assume I had the GnuPG/PGP software.yet tell me how you would use GnuPG/PGP
to encrypt the file and what instructions or methods you would need me to
use to get the encrypted file and decrypt it on the recipients machine
WITHOUT the recipient having GnuPG/PGP software loaded to the recipient
system
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/06/2013 09:46, Henry Hertz Hobbit wrote:
> My personal observations agrees with Rob Hansen's studies 100%.
> Even when required to use encryption people hate doing it and their
> concept is entirely focused on the ciphering with them thinking
>
1 - 100 of 372 matches
Mail list logo
