Hello,
GnuPG: 2.2.7 (built from sources), OS: Ubuntu 16.04.4 (64-bit).
Problem: file pubring.kbx is by default created in GnuPG default config
directory. If some other files I can efficiently relocate in gpg.conf,
i.e. by using something like
primary-keyring ~/mounted/gnupg/pubring.gpg
secre
Hi,
This (doing 'make' and 'make install') is what I did from time to time
on Ubuntu (currently 16.04). I used default path/prefixes, and after
having installed it I rename GnuPG executable /usr/local/bin/gpg to
/usr/local/bin/gpg2
Since /usr/local/bin precedes other default PATH components, gpg2
Hello,
I am currently using Ubuntu 18.04; the "built-in", provided from
standard repository, GnuPG version is 2.2.4 (it can't be simply
removed/replaced by manually built version).
I would like to use, whenever I like, manually builds (such as current
2.2.13).
Question: how do I keep several Gnu
Hi Damien,
On 10.03.2019 21:50, Damien Goutte-Gattat writes:
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 01:25:41AM -0500, Konstantin Boyandin wrote:
>> Question: how do I keep several GnuPG versions installed, every
>> version with its own gpg-agent?
>
> A Gpg-agent is tied to a specific home directory (as specif
Hello All,
After having read the recent multitude of messages related to SKS
keyservers related issue, I figured out that
a. The entire SKS keyservers design and interaction has a fundamental
design flaw named "unlimited resources assumption". I.e., it is assumed
every server, every client h
Hello,
Thanks to everyone who expressed their opinions (I read the thread, even
if I don't reply often). I didn't expect the discussion would become so
red-hot, however.
There's a Russian saying with closest English translation "two movings
are as devastating as one fire". I assume that transitio
4F1D B5AA 3FA3 486E D7AD
Sent with ProtonMail
On Sat, Jul 6, 2019 at 00:33, Teemu Likonen via Gnupg-users
wrote:
Konstantin Boyandin via Gnupg-users [2019-07-05T20:45:59-04:00]
wrote:
ATM, none of systems I use GnuPG in has been hit with the
signature
flood disaster. If I might miss that point
I believe this subject is way off the mailing list, but just my 5 cents.
1. GDPR, as any other bloated, convoluted, written in inhuman juridical
language law, mostly benefits two kinds of people: lawyers and
government-related officials. It incurs a lot of ado and expenses, gives
vast grounds
