Hello!
We are pleased to announce the availability of a new GnuPG release:
version 2.3.0. This release marks the start of public testing releases
eventually leading to a new stable version 2.4.
Although some bugs might linger in the 2.3 versions, they are intended
to replace the 2.2 series. 2.3
Hi,
We are trying to encrypt log files via logrotate & cron, and I hope
someone here can help out a bit.
Our logrotate configuration file contains:
olddir gpg/
compress
compresscmd /usr/bin/gpg
compressoptions -vv --verbose --encrypt --default-key A4DB7xxxD98
compressext
Hi mj.
Thus spoke mj:
> We are trying to encrypt log files via logrotate & cron, and I hope
> someone here can help out a bit.
>
> Our logrotate configuration file contains:
>
>> olddir gpg/
>> compress
>> compresscmd /usr/bin/gpg
>> compressoptions -vv --verbose --encrypt --defaul
It is with great anticipation that I fire up a raspberry pi 4 to compile
the newest version of GnuPG 2.3.0 using speedo. However I ran into:
GnuPG version in swdb.lst is less than this version!
This version: 2.3.0
SWDB version: 2.2.27
/home/pi/Downloads/gnupg-2.3.0/build-aux/speedo.mk:393: ***
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 13:51, Marco Ricci said:
> See above. You probably also want --batch as well.
Definitely. It might also be a good idea to use a dedicated homedir (or
user) for GnuPG or lacking this to add --no-options and give all args on
the command line.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die
A few weeks have passed, and I figured a recap might be appropriate:
* FSF continues to support RMS
* FSFE has ended collaboration with FSF and GNU ("we see
ourselves unable to collaborate both with the FSF and any
other organisation in which Richard Stallman has a
lead
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 11:19, Robert J. Hansen said:
> Werner, are you still set on org-mode as the native format, or has
> Markdown+Pandoc matured enough to also be acceptable?
Yes, pretty please. The FAQ is part of the website which gets
automatically build from org-mode. However, if you want to
This is solely my opinion. But i have to say it now.
Robert J. Hansen wrote in
<3e47e65a-790f-e323-7a0c-c14660cd2...@sixdemonbag.org>:
|A few weeks have passed, and I figured a recap might be appropriate:
|
| * FSF continues to support RMS
I have no opinion on that. I do not know him, n
Hi Werner and Marco,
Thank you very much for both your kind responses. Have adjusted my
config, and in my brief testing it seems to work.
Curious to checkout my server tomorrow morning, after cron did it's
nightly thing.
Thank you!
On 4/8/21 3:06 PM, Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote:
On
I'm just a user, but since this mailing list is called "users", and
for clairity:
>>Always has, hasn't it. I look at that for hm a long time, and it
always was like that.
The FAQ (https://www.gnupg.org/faq/gnupg-faq.html) claims the other
way round, namely:
>GnuPG is free cryptographic software
The FAQ (https://www.gnupg.org/faq/gnupg-faq.html) claims the other
way round, namely:
Yep. Which was why I stepped away: I've ended my affiliations with FSF
and GNU. However, that FAQ was last overhauled in October 2017, and
apparently the relationship has changed in the last three and a ha
On 4/8/2021 5:19 PM, Robert J. Hansen via Gnupg-users wrote:
If anyone in the community has strong feelings about the FAQ -- what
should go in, what should be left out, etc. -- now's the time.
The only thing that I can say is that I would rather see a FAQ that
reflect the current inplementatio
12 matches
Mail list logo
