Hello,
can BitMail.sf.net as a p2p email tool for encrypted Email (and hybrid with
IMAP-Email) be regarded as a reference model for research to create a secure
Email Client? as it uses both, gnupg and openssl!
http://bitmail.sourceforge.net/
https://sourceforge.net/projects/bitmail/files/BitMa
Hello,
can BitMail.sf.net as a p2p email tool for encrypted Email (and hybrid with
IMAP-Email) be regarded as a reference model for research to create a secure
Email Client? as it uses both, gnupg and openssl!
http://bitmail.sourceforge.net/
https://sourceforge.net/projects/bitmail/files/BitMa
Leo Gaspard wrote:
>> You are right. Decryption is sufficient to demonstrate control of
>the private key, because if he can decrypt, he can also sign. What I
>said, "decrypt and sign," was redundant.
>
>Well... I still do not understand why decryption is sufficient to
>demonstrate
>control of th
>> "MFPA" == MFPA writes:
Hello
> There are already several private sector CAs who provide free S/MIME
> certificates in the hope that punters may take one of their paid
> products instead or in addition. Potential sales is their incentive to
> provide some products free. What wou
Hello,
I'm having some troubles using both a PKCS #11 accessed card (national
electronic ID card) and an OpenPGP card in the same computer. I haven't
really looked deep into this yet, but it looks like the smart card
reader is claimed by the driver that is first started (scdaemon or the
natio
> Feel free to use any of my public comments on the topic, either on my
> blog or on Twitter.
Those are great resources I hadn't seen before, thanks for the links!
What do you think about these two? I had a hard time finding quotes from your
articles that fit into 130 chars, so I reworded them:
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 12:40:11AM -0800, Paul R. Ramer wrote:
> I don't know how I can explain it any better than I have. I think you are
> confusing assertion with verification. Unless you can differentiate between
> the two in this case, I don't think you will see what I am talking about.
>
Hello,
I have created another key for me (higher security level) so its user ID has
obviously the same name like the ones of my old key. I did this with
Knoppix 7.2 (i.e. gpg 1.4.x).
After key creation I wanted to add the keys to each other as designated
revokers. But that didn't work as expec
Hi
On Monday 4 November 2013 at 10:43:43 PM, in
, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> - NSA (among others) has abused its resource to
> read emailworldwide at a very large scale.
Indeed.
> - so if a lot of people, say 30 % of all users
> would encrypt theiremail, then NSA statisti
On 11/05/2013 09:26 AM, Leo Gaspard wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 12:40:11AM -0800, Paul R. Ramer wrote:
>> I don't know how I can explain it any better than I have. I think you are
>> confusing assertion with verification. Unless you can differentiate between
>> the two in this case, I don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Tuesday 5 November 2013 at 11:03:19 PM, in
, Paul R. Ramer wrote:
> But if you sign it with an exportable
> signature, you are saying to others that you have
> verified the key.
In the absence of a published keysigning policy, isn't that an
On 6/11/13 2:40 AM, Sam Tuke wrote:
>> Feel free to use any of my public comments on the topic, either on my
>> blog or on Twitter.
>
> Those are great resources I hadn't seen before, thanks for the links!
>
> What do you think about these two? I had a hard time finding quotes
> from your article
Hello,
I am new to GPG, especially writing programs to decrypt stuff. Is this the
right mailing list to ask?
Regards,
Griffin CHENG.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
>On Tuesday 5 November 2013 at 11:03:19 PM, in
>, Paul R. Ramer wrote:
>
>> But if you sign it with an exportable
>> signature, you are saying to others that you have
>> verified the key.
>
>In the absence of a published keysigning policy, isn't that an
>assumption?
Signing is to be an attestation
"Griffin Cheng [CLIB]" wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I am new to GPG, especially writing programs to decrypt stuff. Is this
>the right mailing list to ask?
gnupg-users is for most discussions and gnupg-devel is for
programming/development specific questions. HTH.
Cheers,
--Paul
--
PGP: 3DB6D884
__
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
16 matches
Mail list logo