-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi
On Tuesday 5 November 2013 at 11:03:19 PM, in <mid:52797937.5090...@gmail.com>, Paul R. Ramer wrote: > But if you sign it with an exportable > signature, you are saying to others that you have > verified the key. In the absence of a published keysigning policy, isn't that an assumption? > Collusion is the only way that I know of, I guess coercion would fit, as well. - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:expires2...@ymail.com The greatest of faults is to be conscious of none. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iPQEAQEKAF4FAlJ5kaRXFIAAAAAALgAgaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEJBMjM5QjQ2ODFGMUVGOTUxOEU2QkQ0NjQ0 N0VDQTAzAAoJEKipC46tDG5pyMMD/37UAP0abP2L6tVKQPbH/ie77fo79Pg4OKop jKwDuzBGFrdxKhgV1Y4+Q6h4u8N/xyahtp6yqBjlEj74K+8UBSEtvc8qbNw4g2BU hk3meLpwJw9N92fLJxOvoUQamuotLBOt8ebbKMy3PZgh1jKPponrc54YfoHQ0zI+ tlo6P27m =SN+2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
