FYI,
i've filed a bug report:
https://bugs.g10code.com/gnupg/issue1543
and got a reply that:
"Merging of secret keys has never been not supported. GnuPG 2.1 has a
architecture redesign which supports secret key merging. There won't be any
backport."
--
• attila lendvai
• PGP: 963F 5D5F 45C7
Good morning Paul. Instead of having the mainframe run a process to call the
script on the server, I was able to get an answer from 'them' regarding when
the file would be available, and I've scheduled the process to run on the
server. All is well now.
John Diaz
602-274-5359 x1284
jd...@azdes
I remember once doing this by mistake, using one of the old pgp command lines
(? 6.x), where it allowed me to encrypt to a person's signing key.
In the event that such a thing occurs, could gnupg decrypt it?
(Is there a way for gnupg to make one's signing key, a sign and encrypt key,
AFTER it wa
On 30/09/13 23:10, Pete Stephenson wrote:
> Has anyone else observed this behavior? If so, is there an explanation?
It's probably a benign bug, but it would obviously also be a reasonably good way
to get signatures if somebody had compromised your PC. Put a payload in GnuPG
such that when you try
"Diaz, John, A" wrote:
>Good morning Paul. Instead of having the mainframe run a process to
>call the script on the server, I was able to get an answer from 'them'
>regarding when the file would be available, and I've scheduled the
>process to run on the server. All is well now.
Well, that is
