We have a file sweeper which decrypts the incoming files. The file sweeper is
usually a scheduled process.
Following is the error messages with file sweeper scheduled processing in
production.
gpg: block_filter: 1st length byte missinggpg: block_filter: 1st length byte
missinggpg: WARNING: message
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 00:07, m...@mark-kirchner.de said:
> I've always perceived you as a free software advocate, but now at the
> same time you seem to try to deny others the freedom to discuss software
> alternatives on a public mailing list? And so, in the end, limit the
Most mailing lists have
Hello,
I have some problems with my smartcard :
I use Debian testing with gnupg2 2.0.18, i have a BCM5880 smart card
reader and a zeitcontrol openpgp card.
I read that now gnupg can use 4096bit keys with those smartcard but :
when i load a 4096 bits key in the card i can sign but i'm unable to
uncr
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 11:58, emmanuel.joo...@gmail.com said:
> I use Debian testing with gnupg2 2.0.18, i have a BCM5880 smart card
I don't know thisreader. Is this from Broadcom?
> scdaemon[2840]: pcsc_transmit failed: not transacted (0x80100016)
This error message is kind of "general error". It
Here a full log, before i stop system pcscd but i seams that it is
reload by gpg2.
Also, i success to create or load and use 3072 bits keys.
mahoru@debian:~/.gnupg$ gpg2 --card-edit
scdaemon[3299]: enabled debug flags: cardio
scdaemon[3299]: listening on socket `/tmp/gpg-9QyA9z/S.scdaemon'
scdaem
Am 17.11.2011 12:38, schrieb Werner Koch:
> Despite that the GNU maintainer rules say that we shall not mention
> proprietary software at all
I see. So, since my "frown" was obviously misdirected at you, Werner, I
think I owe you an apology.
But please let me re-phrase: Those rules seem to deny
On 11/17/2011 2:39 PM, Mark Kirchner wrote:
> But please let me re-phrase: Those rules seem to deny people the
> freedom to discuss software alternatives on a public mailing list?
If this was a public mailing list, I'd agree with you.
This mailing list is owned and operated by private citizens.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Thursday 17 November 2011 at 8:31:04 PM, in
, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Saying, "please do not recommend proprietary software"
> is not a rule that gives me the moral heebie-jeebies,
> so I'm happy to comply with it.
For what it's worth, I
Am 17.11.2011 21:31, schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
> On 11/17/2011 2:39 PM, Mark Kirchner wrote:
>> But please let me re-phrase: Those rules seem to deny people the
>> freedom to discuss software alternatives on a public mailing list?
>
> If this was a public mailing list, I'd agree with you.
I used
On 17/11/11 22:23, MFPA wrote:
> For what it's worth, I didn't try to recommend anything.
/Somebody/ did though, although I only see a quote and no author... please
notice the quote below is quoting yet someone else; it is not Sartoretti who
recommended GPGshell.
On 15/11/11 09:39, Sartoretti Pas
On 11/17/2011 4:39 PM, Mark Kirchner wrote:
> I used "public" as in "open to the public". At least that was what I was
> trying to do, but since I'm not a native speaker, I might have mis-used
> the word.
Speaking generally, in English saying something is a "public so-and-so"
means it belongs to t
Hello. When my firewall advises me that GPG agent is "listening on:xyz",
what exactly is it listening for and is that necessary? Thanks.
John
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
12 matches
Mail list logo
