:
> I'm sorry if this is not the right list to send this to. I'd appreciate it
> if you could refer me to the right place that can deal with my problem.
>
> I've never had problems with GNUPG 2.0.14 before. Now all of a sudden I
> can't decrypt my files. I get the message: "[filename] contains no
I'm sorry if this is not the right list to send this to. I'd appreciate it
if you could refer me to the right place that can deal with my problem.
I've never had problems with GNUPG 2.0.14 before. Now all of a sudden I
can't decrypt my files. I get the message: "[filename] contains no value
encryp
It seems no matter which key server I try I encounter the alert saying
nothing can be found. This is very annoying. Does anybody know what the
problem is and how I can fix it? I can not seem to find a list of key
servers online. All I want to do is search for one's public key and
import it but I ca
Jonathan Ely wrote the following on 3/20/11 8:57 AM:
> It seems no matter which key server I try I encounter the alert saying
> nothing can be found. This is very annoying. Does anybody know what the
> problem is and how I can fix it? I can not seem to find a list of key
> servers online. All I wan
On Sunday 20 March 2011, Charly Avital wrote:
> Jonathan Ely wrote the following on 3/20/11 8:57 AM:
> > It seems no matter which key server I try I encounter the alert
> > saying nothing can be found. This is very annoying. Does anybody
> > know what the problem is and how I can fix it? I can not
I removed the text signature in the account options just to be sure.
Hopefully this avoids complications. Is it because I use MIME?
On 20/03/2011 11:43 AM, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> On Sunday 20 March 2011, Charly Avital wrote:
>> Jonathan Ely wrote the following on 3/20/11 8:57 AM:
>>> It seems no ma
Ingo Klöcker wrote the following on 3/20/11 11:43 AM:
>
> I doubt this very much because the encoding surely happens before the
> signing.
>
>
> Regards,
> Ingo
In my post, I also indicated that there was a string --=20 between the
actual text and the signature disclaimer ""CONFIDENTIALITY NOT
On Sunday 20 March 2011, Charly Avital wrote:
> Ingo Klöcker wrote the following on 3/20/11 11:43 AM:
> > I doubt this very much because the encoding surely happens before
> > the signing.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ingo
>
> In my post, I also indicated that there was a string --=20 between
> the
The attached .asc file causes problems? I have disabled that but still
enabled the header. Why would the .asc attachment option be there if it
causes problems?
On 20/03/2011 01:28 PM, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> On Sunday 20 March 2011, Charly Avital wrote:
>> Ingo Klöcker wrote the following on 3/20/11
On 20/03/11 1:52 PM, MFPA wrote:
> On Sunday 13 March 2011 at 4:39:49 PM, in
> , Ben McGinnes wrote:
>>
>> That too is an understandable argument. Especially when it comes
>> to searching the keyservers, but less easy to maintain in relation
>> to searches of a local keyring
>
> Whether on a keys
On 21/03/11 5:11 AM, Jonathan Ely wrote:
>
> The attached .asc file causes problems? I have disabled that but
> still enabled the header. Why would the .asc attachment option be
> there if it causes problems?
The .asc file is the GPG signature and does not cause problems. The
signature that is re
Firstly, what is MUA? I hear that but am not sure what that means.
Secondly, I have disabled that in Thunderbird. I had no idea it modified
anything; I thought it was simply a text signature that did not
interfere with Enigmail and GnuPG. Thanks for enabling me to understand
the complication there.
On 21/03/11 6:11 AM, Jonathan Ely wrote:
> Firstly, what is MUA? I hear that but am not sure what that means.
MUA = Mail User Agent, e.g. Thunderbird, Outlook, Apple Mail, etc.
MTA = Mail Transfer Agent, e.g. Sendmail, Postfix, Exchange, etc.
> Secondly, I have disabled that in Thunderbird. I had
we are supposed to be on 2.0.17
if the user sent data and didn't click the PGP/MIME option this could be
trouble
if you don't have the key for the sender this will be trouble
check in Kleo/config, make sure you have the right keyserver. i think
it should be
hkp://keys.gnupg.net
if you had
On 03/20/2011 15:50, Jonathan Ely wrote:
> Just to let you know, your signature failed to validate and thus says
> ‘bad’. Hope this helps.
YES!! Thanks x 100!!
==> I have UPLOADED my Public key to the hkp://keys.gnupg.net server
let's see if this one goes OK!! I really appreciate the come-back we
I do not use the Gmail interface any more; I only use the Thunderbird
client and typed the signature in the edit field found in the Tools |
Account options | General dialogue. It always appears in the body, right
under the point where I type. If this is the case it should not
interfere with Enigmai
On 21/03/11 6:48 AM, Jonathan Ely wrote:
>
> I do not use the Gmail interface any more; I only use the
> Thunderbird client and typed the signature in the edit field found
> in the Tools | Account options | General dialogue. It always appears
> in the body, right under the point where I type. If th
On Sunday 20 March 2011, Jonathan Ely wrote:
> On 20/03/2011 03:35 PM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
> > To be sure that a text signature is appended without interfering
> > with the digital signature, it should appear in the body of the
> > message when you edit it. Thunderbird is quite capable of doing
>
On 03/20/2011 15:50, Jonathan Ely wrote:
> Just to let you know, your signature failed to validate and thus says
> 'bad'. Hope this helps.
added note: when i received your message THUNDERBIRD reported
"Unverified signature". I selected the option to load your key from the
server ( hkp://keys.gnupg
On 03/20/2011 04:31 PM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
> On 21/03/11 6:48 AM, Jonathan Ely wrote:
>>
>> I do not use the Gmail interface any more; I only use the
>> Thunderbird client and typed the signature in the edit field found
>> in the Tools | Account options | General dialogue. It always appears
>> in
Really? For me, it is much easier to access the newest reply instead of
using the Down Arrow key to find it. Gmail always worked the same way
for me.
On 20/03/2011 04:44 PM, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> On Sunday 20 March 2011, Jonathan Ely wrote:
>> On 20/03/2011 03:35 PM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
>>> To be
On Sunday 20 March 2011, Ben McGinnes wrote:
> On 21/03/11 5:11 AM, Jonathan Ely wrote:
> > The attached .asc file causes problems? I have disabled that but
> > still enabled the header. Why would the .asc attachment option be
> > there if it causes problems?
>
> The .asc file is the GPG signature
Hi,
* Jonathan Ely [110320 22:18,
mID <4d866ead.9080...@gmail.com>]:
> Really? For me, it is much easier to access the newest reply instead of
> using the Down Arrow key to find it. Gmail always worked the same way
> for me.
You might want to read [1,2,3].
[1] https://wiki.fsfe.org/Fellows/
On 21/03/11 8:16 AM, Jonathan Ely wrote:
> Really? For me, it is much easier to access the newest reply instead of
> using the Down Arrow key to find it. Gmail always worked the same way
> for me.
It does make it easier to follow a conversation in context if multiple
sections of a conversation are
On 03/20/2011 17:19, Jonathan Ely wrote:
> It can be complicated; it is for me since I am still new to this. I only
> ‘trust fully’ those keys who come from people who I think would not fake
> identity, or have no reason not to be trusted fully. Is it unwise to
> trust anybody's key fully even if y
On 03/20/2011 05:16 PM, Jonathan Ely wrote:
> Really? For me, it is much easier to access the newest reply instead of
> using the Down Arrow key to find it. Gmail always worked the same way
> for me.
>
Ingo's talking about the body of the message. Most mailing lists people
reply after the questi
On 03/20/2011 05:29 PM, Mike Acker wrote:
> On 03/20/2011 17:19, Jonathan Ely wrote:
>> It can be complicated; it is for me since I am still new to this. I only
>> ‘trust fully’ those keys who come from people who I think would not fake
>> identity, or have no reason not to be trusted fully. Is it
Something to think about that one. I guess I will experiment in the
future, but I understand what you mean and you do have a point with the
question > answer order rather than the reverse. Now I understand why
Thunderbird has that option.
On 20/03/2011 05:35 PM, Grant Olson wrote:
> On 03/20/2011
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Sunday 20 March 2011 at 6:31:49 PM, in
, Ben McGinnes wrote:
> On 20/03/11 1:52 PM, MFPA wrote:
>> Whether on a keyserver or on your local keyring, I see
>> little difference.
> Which just shows how your use differs with that of
> others.
we are supposed to be on 2.0.17
if the user sent data and didn't click the PGP/MIME option this could be
trouble
if you don't have the key for the sender this will be trouble
check in Kleo/config, make sure you have the right keyserver. i think
it should be
hkp://keys.gnupg.net
if you had
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:26:03PM +0100, Martin Gollowitzer wrote:
Really? For me, it is much easier to access the newest reply instead of
using the Down Arrow key to find it. Gmail always worked the same way
for me.
You might want to read [1,2,3].
[1] https://wiki.fsfe.org/Fellows/mk/EmailGu
Hi,
* Remco Rijnders [110321 07:35,
mID <412.a...@winter.webconquest.com>]:
> While I fully agree on bottom posting being preferred, I wonder if it's
> not a lost battle already. People quoting 'properly' are in such a
> minority that I don't think this can be changed around anymore. Of cou
32 matches
Mail list logo
