Hello,
Am Freitag 18 Juni 2010 02:10:22 schrieb MFPA:
> I don't know how common or uncommon it might be. I just know that, of
> the keys in my keyring of about 400 keys, I have noticed more
> deviations away from my default keyserver to key.asc files than to
> alternate keyservers.
but this is a
Hi,
I would like to know if there is a way to add multiple signatures for a file
(in a separate file) and check who signed with just one command (so not by
signing a signed file...).
Thanks,
Koushkov
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
h
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:04:41 -0600
Richard Hamilton articulated:
> I am out of the office until 06/24/2010.
>
> I am out of the office until Thursday June 24th. If this is a
> production problem, please call the solution center at 918-573-2336
> or email Bob Olson at robert.ol...@williams.com.
Hi group,
I am trying to include support for IDEA within GnuPG 2.0.9 running under
Linux. I have downloaded the idea.c module via the link on this page:
http://www.gnupg.org/faq/why-not-idea.html, have compiled it and have
added the
load-extension /idea
statement to my conf file in ~/.g
Jerry wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:04:41 -0600
> I was just stating to a colleague that it had been months since an
> errant "vacation" message had been posted on this forum. Well, thanks
> to Bob, that drought has been quenched. With the summer season now
> upon us and vacations becoming the n
On 6/17/10 11:33 PM, Boris wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know if there is a way to add multiple signatures for a
> file (in a separate file) and check who signed with just one command (so
> not by signing a signed file...).
gpg --armor -u signer -u signer2 -u signer3 --clearsign filename
Wa
On Jun 17, 2010, at 11:33 PM, Boris wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know if there is a way to add multiple signatures for a file
> (in a separate file) and check who signed with just one command (so not by
> signing a signed file...).
Sure.
gpg -u signer_1 -u signer_2 -u signer_3 --detac
David Smith wrote:
> Jean-David Beyer wrote:
>> If I understand correctly, this is done by setting the precedence of the
>> vacation e-mail to "bulk" instead of something else ("list"?), and that
>> mailing list programs do not send the stuff marked bulk.
>>
>> Is that not how mailing list programs
Jean-David Beyer wrote:
> David Smith wrote:
>> Mailing lists programs normally send mails with the "Precedence: bulk"
>> or "Precedence: junk" header, and then the autoresponder should
>> recognise this and choose not to respond to mails with the "bulk" or
>> "junk" precedence header. It is up to
> On Jun 17, 2010, at 11:33 PM, Boris wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to know if there is a way to add multiple signatures for a
> > file (in a separate file) and check who signed with just one command (so
> > not by signing a signed file...).
>
> Sure.
>
> gpg -u signer_1 -u signer_2
Jean-David Beyer wrote:
> Well, the stuff I get from the Gnupg-users@gnupg.org list has
> "precedence: list" set. Other lists to which I subscribe use "Precedence
> normal" or "precedence: bulk". Regular e-mail does not have precedence
> set at all. It seems to me that mailing lists should get the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 18/06/2010 14:24, David Smith wrote:
> Jean-David Beyer wrote:
>> David Smith wrote:
>>> Mailing lists programs normally send mails with the "Precedence: bulk"
>>> or "Precedence: junk" header, and then the autoresponder should
>>> recognise this
Hi there,
for a Test i installed GPG on MacOsX 5.8,
so far so good, works fine, thank you Guys btw. for that nice Work.
But now i hang there and im not able to uninstall the hole thing.
Can someone tell me a workthrough, cause im not so close to Procedures
that be probable neccessary to it.
On Jun 14, 2010, at 12:50 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 06/04/2010 01:35 PM, Micah Anderson wrote:
>> It seems like the best solution would be to build into gnupg the
>> functionality
>> that is similar to the automatic trust database operation: have gpg
>> auto-refresh
>> from the configu
On 05/03/2010 10:17 AM, Joke de Buhr wrote:
> I'm using Ubuntu lucid (amd64) with firefox 3.6.3.
>
> On Monday 03 May 2010 15:49:35 Werner Koch wrote:
>> On Mon, 3 May 2010 12:22, j...@seiken.de said:
>>> selecting my key I always get this firefox error message
>>> "sec_error_pkcs11_function_fail
On Jun 14, 2010, at 7:58 PM, MFPA wrote:
> On Monday 14 June 2010 at 5:50:32 PM, in
> , Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>
>
>> Network or keyserver failures during an auto-refresh
>> should be accepted and the rest of the operation should
>> continue (though the last-refreshed time shouldn't be
>> up
Robert J. Hansen rjh at sixdemonbag.org wrote on
Fri Jun 18 14:13:56 CEST 2010 :
>> I would like to know if there is a way to add multiple
>signatures for a
>> file (in a separate file) and check who signed with just one
>command (so
>> not by signing a signed file...).
>
>
>gpg --armor -u sign
On 06/18/10 12:42, David Shaw wrote:
The danger here is that it might take a long time (minutes+) to realize that
the keyserver and/or network wasn't going to cooperate. This could seriously
slow down many GPG operations.
I've been following this discussion with interest as I've seen proble
18 matches
Mail list logo
