On 06/18/10 12:42, David Shaw wrote:
The danger here is that it might take a long time (minutes+) to realize that the keyserver and/or network wasn't going to cooperate. This could seriously slow down many GPG operations.
I've been following this discussion with interest as I've seen problems related to others not updating keys in the past. However I think David has identified the same 2 critical problems that I did, non-trivial amounts of modifications to the keyserver network, and the one he mentions above. Personally I think better education for users about the importance of refreshing their keys is a better way to go.
The idea that has been percolating in my brain is a warning message of some sort when gpg accesses a key that hasn't been refreshed in $PERIOD. If I understand the keybox idea properly it should be possible to store the "last refreshed" time in a format that gpg can easily deal with in line, so hopefully adding a warning won't be too difficult if that's desirable.
Doug -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/ _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users