Hello List,
when I create a signature with "gpg --sign", I'm able to use "gpg
--decrypt" to get the plaintext from the signature.
When I'm try to to this using gpgme resp.
gpgme_op_decrypt (gpgme_ctx_t ctx, gpgme_data_t cipher, gpgme_data_t plain)
I'm getting a GPG_ERR_NO_DATA error if ciphe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Thursday 25 February 2010 at 3:53:23 AM, in
, John Clizbe wrote:
> MFPA wrote:
>> Hi John
>> On Thursday 25 February 2010 at 12:17:36 AM, you
>> wrote:
>>> It is also a good idea to send your key to the
>>> keyservers.
>> But is, of cour
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
- --
Best regards
MFPAmailto:expires2...@ymail.com
Ultimate consistency lies in being consistently inconsistent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQCVAwUBS4aK6aipC46tDG5pAQoWfgP+Kaflz5+32QsDfOJBV+tm33kXb8oDQzMo
5NJUH40YjCc
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:33:14 -0800, "Smith, Cathy" wrote:
> We are migrating from OpenPGP which is a freeware version of PGP. Sorry for
> the confusion.
I'm not familiar with OpenPGP, the software. I'm familiar with the PGP
Corporation's implementation (which I think is just called "PGP"), but
Here is the information for the freeware version of PGP.
http://www.pgpi.org/
Cathy
---
Cathy L. Smith
IT Engineer
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Phone: 509.375.2687
Fax: 509.375.2330
Email: cathy.sm...@pnl.gov
-Original Message-
From: Jameson Rollins [ma
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> On 2/24/10 11:18 AM, Jerry wrote:
> > Outlook Express is depreciated.
>
> Outlook Express is deprecated, and many people here throw deprecations
> against it -- but Outlook Express is still one of the most common MUAs
> in existence, and f
On 02/25/2010 11:59 AM, Carlos Chavez wrote:
> I have to write the whole email manually in PHP because the PEAR libraries for
> Mime do not quite get the headers right
Please file bugs against the PEAR libraries in question so that they can
be fixed. Thanks!
Regards,
--dkg
signature
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:35, f.schw...@chili-radiology.com said:
> when I create a signature with "gpg --sign", I'm able to use "gpg
> --decrypt" to get the plaintext from the signature.
You might want to use:
gpg --verify --output PAINTEXT.TXT SIGNED.GPG
> So is there a way to get the plaintex
MFPA wrote:
> On Thursday 25 February 2010 at 3:53:23 AM, in
> , John Clizbe wrote:
>> MFPA wrote:
>>> Hi John
>
>>> On Thursday 25 February 2010 at 12:17:36 AM, you wrote:
>
It is also a good idea to send your key to the keyservers.
>
>>> But is, of course, a matter of personal choice.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Florian Weimer escribió:
> * Stefan Xenon:
>
>> I don't know any integration in GnuPG but instead the following open
>> source implementatio may worth a try: http://point-at-infinity.org//
>
> IIRC, this particular software does not implement S
On 2/25/10 9:24 AM, MFPA wrote:
> Some people hate the idea and get *very* upset if their key does end
> up on the servers.
What you're advocating here is "DRM on the honor system." Don't copy
the key, don't distribute the key, don't upload the key, don't do
anything with the key, without the exp
Folks
Another question about this migration. Is it possible to do a mass import of a
single user's keyring or do I have to do it for each individual key. I've not
been able to find anything so far about anything that addresses this.
Thanks.
Cathy
---
Cathy L. Smith
IT Engineer
Pacific Nort
On Feb 25, 2010, at 5:17 PM, Smith, Cathy wrote:
> Folks
>
> Another question about this migration. Is it possible to do a mass import of
> a single user's keyring or do I have to do it for each individual key. I've
> not been able to find anything so far about anything that addresses this.
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 14:24 +, MFPA wrote:
> My point was that not everybody wishes/chooses to send their keys to
> the keyservers.
>
> Some people hate the idea and get *very* upset if their key does end
> up on the servers.
In my case, the reason that I uploaded my keys to public keyservers
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 15:23 -0500, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> On 2/25/10 9:24 AM, MFPA wrote:
> > Some people hate the idea and get *very* upset if their key does end
> > up on the servers.
>
> What you're advocating here is "DRM on the honor system." Don't copy
> the key, don't distribute the key
Hello Smith, !
"Smith, Cathy" wrote:
> Another question about this migration. Is it possible to do a mass import
> of a single user's keyring or do I have to do it for each individual key.
> I've not been able to find anything so far about anything that addresses
> this.
I would try
gpg
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 15:23 -0500, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> On 2/25/10 9:24 AM, MFPA wrote:
> > Some people hate the idea and get *very* upset if their key does end
> > up on the servers.
>
> What you're advocating here is "DRM on the honor system." Don't copy
> the key, don't distribute the key
My error. I didn't CC the following message to the mailing list.
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 02:38 -0800, Paul Richard Ramer wrote:
> I won't add to the other good replies, except for this. Concerning
> the
> revocation certificate that you would be behooved to create, you
> should
> take care to prot
On 2/25/10 1:04 PM, John Clizbe said:
> MFPA wrote:
>
>> On Thursday 25 February 2010 at 3:53:23 AM, in
>> , John Clizbe wrote:
>>
>>> MFPA wrote:
>>>
Hi John
On Thursday 25 February 2010 at 12:17:36 AM, you wrote:
> It is also a good idea to
On 2/25/10 8:29 PM, Yawar Amin wrote:
> I interpret that word, public, differently. To me just because a key
> _can_ be made public doesn't mean it automatically _should_.
What in life is automatic, besides death and taxes?
We are not talking about automatic here. We are talking instead about
w
20 matches
Mail list logo
