My error. I didn't CC the following message to the mailing list. On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 02:38 -0800, Paul Richard Ramer wrote: > I won't add to the other good replies, except for this. Concerning > the > revocation certificate that you would be behooved to create, you > should > take care to protect it. If an enemy (and we hope you don't have > any :-)) got a hold of your revocation certificate, he could revoke > your > key by uploading the certificate to public keyservers. > > Even though your copy of your private and public keys wouldn't be > revoked, all of the copies of your public key on the public keyservers > would be revoked. This, of course, would be a major impediment to > people wanting to privately communicate with you. > > Other than that, feel free to ask your questions on this mailing list. > We are here to help. > > Paul > -- > Privacy is good. Use PGP. > > +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | PGP Key ID: 0x3DB6D884 | > | PGP Fingerprint: EBA7 88B3 6D98 2D4A E045 A9F7 C7C6 6ADF 3DB6 D884 | > +---------------------------------------------------------------------+
-- Privacy is good. Use PGP. +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ | PGP Key ID: 0x3DB6D884 | | PGP Fingerprint: EBA7 88B3 6D98 2D4A E045 A9F7 C7C6 6ADF 3DB6 D884 | +---------------------------------------------------------------------+
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
