On Sun, 2005-03-20 at 10:09 +0100, Gerhard Siegesmund wrote:
> Say, I have a encrypted file somewhere on a server on the net.
> Naturally I don't have my private key on that "unsave" server. I want
> to use the output of the encrypted file in a pipe to do something with
> it.
>
> I don't like the
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Gerhard Siegesmund wrote:
Almost. :-) But this is the other way round. I want to call gpg from the
other server to decrypt something. I have the feeling, that it is not
possible to send something for decryption to another server. This would
have been a great feature. Imagine
Hello Atom Smasher
> this seems to work for me:
> $ ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'cat file1' | gpg | ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'cat - >
> file2'
> note the quotes.
> it reads an encrypted file (file1) from the server, decrypts it locally
> and writes the decrypted data back to a file (file2) on the serve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
this seems to work for me:
$ ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'cat file1' | gpg | ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'cat - >
file2'
note the quotes.
it reads an encrypted file (file1) from the server, decrypts it locally
and writes the decrypted data back to a file
Hello John
> Have you considered copying the encrypted file with scp, the opening a
> ssh sheel to decrypt & run?
Yes. As noted in my email this surely is one possibility. But this means
I have to copy the encrypted file to my home-server, decrypt it there
and then copy it back unencrypted to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerhard Siegesmund wrote:
> Hello List
>
> I don't know, whether this is a dump thing to do, but I had the
> following idea, which I unfortunately didn't get to work.
>
> I am working on linux (debian) with gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.0.
>
> Say, I have a encry
Hello List
I don't know, whether this is a dump thing to do, but I had the
following idea, which I unfortunately didn't get to work.
I am working on linux (debian) with gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.0.
Say, I have a encrypted file somewhere on a server on the net.
Naturally I don't have my private key on that
