> Which one is better/more used?
WinPT only works with the 1.4 branch of GnuPG and hasn't had a new
release in the last five years. I'm under the impression Timo (the
author) has stopped working on it or supporting it. Given that, I'd
have to recomme
You're confusing gpa and winpt. Gpa is the default utility included with
winpt, but kleopatra is also included with winpt. Comparison wise, kleo has
more features, but gpa's futures are more... useful? I find myself using
gpa daily, and kleopatra only on rare occasion
On Nov 28, 201
As far as I can see Kleopatra and WinPT are similar, competing tools for the
same purpose:
Management of pgp keys & certificates.
What are the differences in details?
Which one is better/more used?
Ben
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-u
Hello,
there has been released an new version of WinPT.
Info: http://winpt.gnupt.de
--
Barry
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Hello,
there has been released an new version of WinPT.
Info: http://winpt.gnupt.de
--
Barry
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Hello,
there has been released an new version of WinPT.
Info: http://winpt.gnupt.de
--
Barry
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
someone explain to me what's going on with my system?
>>
>> I shall ask at this time if You clicked on 'Refresh Keys' in the
>> Enigmail Key Management window?
>
> Actually, I was noticing that WinPT was not showing keys that Enigmail
> -- and GnuPG --
G (C:\Program
> > Files\GNU\GnuPG\gpg.exe), and at least WinPT knows where the GnuPG
> > keyrings are (C:\Users\chesky\AppData\Roaming\gnupg).
> >
> > Can someone explain to me what's going on with my system?
>
> While this Question more properly belongs on the En
GPG (C:\Program
> Files\GNU\GnuPG\gpg.exe), and at least WinPT knows where the GnuPG
> keyrings are (C:\Users\chesky\AppData\Roaming\gnupg).
>
> Can someone explain to me what’s going on with my system?
While this Question more properly belongs on the Enigmail List
[https://www.mozdev.or
I was under the impression that GnuPG kept track of everything, but I
noticed that Windows Privacy Tray and Enigmail do not always show the
same keys.
Both are accessing the correct version of GPG (C:\Program
Files\GNU\GnuPG\gpg.exe), and at least WinPT knows where the GnuPG
keyrings are (C
On Wed, 3 Dec 2008, Mark Rousell wrote:
. . .
The thing to remember is in this context is that taking personal
responsibility for verifying information received is a valid and
relevant principle regardless of how much or how little information you
have available to you to begin with. In this spe
mode), googling for the
WinPT url gives someone a clue how to prepare to try to attack
you.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Mark Rousell wrote:
> Thus there is no logical basis (in terms of personal responsibility
> for information verification) to intentionally avoid including a URL.
Absurd. You're assuming the very thing you're trying to prove. You're
starting by saying "there's no reason for him not to have done i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John W. Moore III wrote:
> Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> Mark Rousell wrote:
>>> I rather think it's up to someone posting an announcement about "new
>>> WinPT-Website" to provide the URL, don'
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 02.12.2008 15:48:
> I than used their installer which did work
GnuPT the installer works, but the WinPT-Zipfile not?
But this is very strange (on your system)
The paths accordingly, would be the smallest problem...
Sorry for not posting the link. A little Mist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Mark Rousell wrote:
>> I rather think it's up to someone posting an announcement about "new
>> WinPT-Website" to provide the URL, don't you?
> Which dodges both the question and respo
_
(http://www.gnupt.de/wp/index.php?lang=en)
Let us know if you update. I tried using the zip file and overwriting the
old Winpt files like I have done for years with updates and Winpt 1.3.1 would
NOT work for me. DOA, nada - totally nothing, no error messages, no crash -
just a vo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Most kind of you Robert, however I posted my message to prompt Barry to
perhaps provide the URL which he apparently missed out of his announcement.
- --
MarkR
PGP public key: http://www.signal100.com/markr/publickey
Key ID: C9C5C162
-BEGIN PGP S
Mark Rousell wrote:
> Do you have the URL for the website?
In the future, please try Google first. You'll get answers much more
quickly that way.
http://www.gnupt.de/wp/index.php?lang=en
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Barry wrote:
> Hello,
>
> a new version GnuPT has been published.
>
> New in this version:
>
> WinPT was updated to version 1.3.1 . There were many small bug fixes.
> Also an update for GnuPT-Portable
> .
>
> B
Hello,
a new version GnuPT has been published.
New in this version:
WinPT was updated to version 1.3.1 . There were many small bug fixes.
Also an update for GnuPT-Portable
.
Barry
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http
Hello,
(Original quote from the german GnuPP mailing list)
recently introduced a new version GnuPT published.
New in this version:
WinPT was to version 1.3.0 update.
The main change in WinPT expected the merger of the two authors
GnuPT and WinPT of his.
The new official site of WinPT
Werner Koch wrote:
> A suggest to use hkp://keys.gnupg.net which directs only to keyservers
> known to work. All these keyservers are syncronized, so it does in
> practice not matter which one you use.
Or hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net which is updated twice per day to only include
online and sync
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> fix) but I keep getting a message when I try to send the key back to
> the server with my signature. "http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371: Could not
That URL is a collection of keyservers; you use a random one and thus
you can't know whether this is a
is is from gpg4win download I have from just
recent (8/10-8/11). What can I do to fix this without having to copy
to clipboard, going to same server's web page and pasting?
Allen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) - WinPT 1.2.0
Julia Dashkevich wrote:
> no tool for uninstalling my current version separately
> from gpg4win. What are the steps for updating winpt
> to the newer version and can it be done without
> affecting the current gpg installation?
Just unzip the ZIP archive and overwrite the ptd
--- Timo Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for your insights, Timo.
Following your advice, i have downloaded winpt
v.1.0.1, but i don't know how to install it: there is
no tool for uninstalling my current version separately
from gpg4win. What are the steps for updating w
ity it doesn't work for some windows. There
is, IMHO, nothing I can do about it.
But it is a good idea always to use the newest
WinPT version (1.0.1) because each new release
contains bug fixes and possible improvment of
existing features.
Hi all,
There is a problem here with winpt refusing to encrypt
the message composition window, whenever i try to use
this feature, it tries to encrypt the main window of
the MUA. Tried the same thing with gpgshell, and it
worked fine. Do you think it is a bug?
It would be good to get any
Fantastic! Thanks! --robert
Werner Koch wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 14:35, Robert T Wyatt said:
>
>> I've seen several (old) references to winpt as the GUI for Windows.
>> Before I download and install it, I would like to ask whether it is
>> still maintained and w
On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 14:35, Robert T Wyatt said:
> I've seen several (old) references to winpt as the GUI for Windows.
> Before I download and install it, I would like to ask whether it is
> still maintained and whether it is still the proper choice of a GUI for
> that platform. M
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've seen several (old) references to winpt as the GUI for Windows.
Before I download and install it, I would like to ask whether it is
still maintained and whether it is still the proper choice of a GUI for
that platform. Mind you, I have a wo
Johan Wevers schrieb:
> Does anyone know how to set the homedir that WinPT assumes for gpg
> to another place as Application Data? I want it to be somewhere in
> My Documents on my PC at work. Changing the registry entry for gpg
> didn't work for WinPT.
There is a bug in th
Hello,
Does anyone know how to set the homedir that WinPT assumes for gpg
to another place as Application Data? I want it to be somewhere in
My Documents on my PC at work. Changing the registry entry for gpg
didn't work for WinPT.
--
ir. J.C.A. Wevers // Physics and science fi
On Thu Jun 22 2006; 10:10, Kim Haverblad wrote:
> located I found that the pubring.gpg has been copied to pubring.bak and
> pubring.gpg is now empty?! What went wrong here?
The WinPT program never openes any keyring in write-mode. For the
backup, just the pubring.gpg will be copied to p
No for while and usually on a system (running Win XP Pro SP2) that has
been in use for couple of weeks WinPT suddenly starts up and claims
following "The keycache was not initialized or is empty. Please check
your PGP config (keyrings, pathes...) and I'm then asked to identify and
On Mon Jan 30 2006; 11:51, Johan Wevers wrote:
> >I fixed this in the CVS. A new release should be available within
> >some hours.
>
> OK, 0.11.7 starts fine. Was the problem indeed related to v3 keys?
Yes.
> They can't be that uncommon.
I tested it with several keys without any problems. Th
Timo Schulz wrote:
>I fixed this in the CVS. A new release should be available within
>some hours.
OK, 0.11.7 starts fine. Was the problem indeed related to v3 keys?
They can't be that uncommon.
--
ir. J.C.A. Wevers // Physics and science fiction site:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://w
On Fri Jan 27 2006; 01:10, Johan Wevers wrote:
> Still gives the same error: a NULL pointer assignment:
>
> The instruction at "0x00441dfd" referenced memory at "0x". The
> memory could not be read.
I fixed this in the CVS. A new release should be available within
some hours.
Timo Schulz wrote:
>Maybe you can check out the latest CVS snapshot, it contains some fixes:
>http://www.stud.uni-hannover.de/~twoaday/winpt-cvs-exe.zip
>(the file just contains the WinPT.exe and PTD.dll, so you need an existing
> WinPT installation)
Still gives the same error: a
ings,
> with v3 keys in them,
> winpt-cvs crashes upon loading the pubring.gpg on start-up
Thanks for the test data, I will definitely check this out tomorrow
and hopefully I can fix the crashes and release 0.11.7 which works
again on these mac
vedaal at hush.com vedaal at hush.com wrote
Thu Jan 26 20:24:17 CET 2006 :
the spam protection changed the passphrase
> -BEGIN PGP PRIVATE KEY BLOCK-
>Version: GnuPG v1.4.3-cvs (MingW32)
>Comment: passphrase: tfrsatest at key.test
^^
the correct passphr
Timo Schulz twoaday at gmx.net wrote on
Thu Jan 26 07:13:42 CET 2006 :
>> (except the keyserver config) from the old WinPT dir and copied
the new
>> files there. However, now WinPT crashes at startup.
>I got some reports about this problem but I was never able to
>repr
Timo Schulz wrote:
>No. If you deleted all existing (older versions) of PTD.dll, libgpgme-11.dll
>and replace WinPT.exe and all DLL's in the WinPT folder it should work.
OK, so no registering of dll's is required.
The only file I kept was keyserver.conf, containing a s
On Wed Jan 25 2006; 23:33, Johan Wevers wrote:
> (except the keyserver config) from the old WinPT dir and copied the new
> files there. However, now WinPT crashes at startup. This happens both at
I got some reports about this problem but I was never able to reproduce it.
On most machi
Hello,
I just upgraded WinPT from 0.9.90 to 0.11.6. I just deleted all files
(except the keyserver config) from the old WinPT dir and copied the new
files there. However, now WinPT crashes at startup. This happens both at
win2000 and winXP. Did I do anything wrong with this update method? I&#
engage wrote:
can refresh or add to the public keyring from the CLI with gpg but I can't
refresh the keys using the same server from within WinPT.
There might be a problem with the code. Please can you check out
0.11.4 (0.10.1 is rather obsolete)?
I hope I'm not off-topic but I have a question about WinPT. It seems that I
can refresh or add to the public keyring from the CLI with gpg but I can't
refresh the keys using the same server from within WinPT. I keep getting an
error about WinPT not able to access the server. I tried
On Thu Sep 08 2005; 16:04, Graeme Nichols wrote:
> I have just installed the latest WinPT front-end 1.0rc2 from their web
> site. I want to use my installed gpg 1.4.2 but it will not run. It produces
> an error stating that it needs gpg 1.1 or higher. It runs OK with the
The SF.ne
Maybe off topic.If so please point me in the right direction. OS is WIN XP
SP2
I have just installed the latest WinPT front-end 1.0rc2 from their web site.
I want to use my installed gpg 1.4.2 but it will not run. It produces an
error stating that it needs gpg 1.1 or higher. It runs OK with
Michael W. Lucas wrote:
For a long time here's been a WinPT download at www.winpt.org, which
includes GnuPG.
As of April 4 there's a GnuPG-win32 download at www.g10code.de, which
includes WinPT.
Is one more "authoritative" than the other? Where should people be
going fo
Hi,
For a long time here's been a WinPT download at www.winpt.org, which
includes GnuPG.
As of April 4 there's a GnuPG-win32 download at www.g10code.de, which
includes WinPT.
Is one more "authoritative" than the other? Where should people be
going for the One True WinPT? I
Alphax wrote:
> I've got 0.9.92.0 (I don't remember where from). I was under the
> impression that the sourceforge version was no longer being maintained.
That's right. The sf.net site of WinPT is currently not actively
maintained. To download WinPT, please use http://www
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Christopher C. Stacy wrote:
> On winpt.sourceforge.net, I find a "Windows Privacy Tools"
> aka "WinPT" project; this seems to be the one that Timo maintains.
> (That is, it seems to be the "official" W
On winpt.sourceforge.net, I find a "Windows Privacy Tools"
aka "WinPT" project; this seems to be the one that Timo maintains.
(That is, it seems to be the "official" WinPT.)
The latest released version is 0.9.11.
There is also 1.0rc2 (2nd release candidate).
On ww
On Mon Jun 06 2005; 10:39, Peter Schott wrote:
> Current running WinPT and the Outlook plugin. Those would be the only
> programs I can think of that would be touching the keyring.
As I said, WinPT never writes the files directly. I heard about one or
two where something similar happene
Timo, I'm using 1.4.1 on my PC. I was just a little concerned as I
don't use GPG on a regular basis so when something reports that one of
my keyrings is corrupt, it's probably one of my manager-type programs.
Current running WinPT and the Outlook plugin. Those would be the only
On Fri Jun 03 2005; 13:16, Peter Schott wrote:
> I will sometimes start my PC and when the WinPT program launches, I have
> a 0-byte pubring or secring. I have backups, but I am a little
I heard about this problem one or two times, but fact is that WinPT never
writes to the keyring di
Running latest version of GPG on Windows XP.
I will sometimes start my PC and when the WinPT program launches, I have
a 0-byte pubring or secring. I have backups, but I am a little
concerned that I could lose all of my keys due to some corruption or
improper closing of the file.
Has anyone else
> WinPT supports all Windows versions (95 limited). The problem is that some
> OS components are too old. This is also a problem for other programs and
> not just WinPT. If you update the Internet Explorer, you will get a newer
> version of the needed components. You can also use t
Timo Schulz wrote:
>I don't know the exact version of IE which is needed. And I still think
>that today a newbie would rather use XP than any older W32 version.
Should, perhaps, But can? I've constructed some PC's from old (P1-P2
hardware) that was dumped by companies, installed win98SE on it and
On Sun Apr 10 2005; 23:42, Johan Wevers wrote:
> Hmmm. I see win98 still being used a lot, but ME was such a crappy version
> that I rarely see it. Win98SE is often installed when refurbishing old
And 98 is no problem because SE comes with a proper version.
> I see no problem with this. For the
Timo Schulz wrote:
>Then I guess the easiest way is that I remove the 'supports 95/NT'
>string because I expect at least an average PC system. And this means
>at least ME and a recent Explorer version.
Hmmm. I see win98 still being used a lot, but ME was such a crappy version
that I rarely see it
uirement for running a program. The difference?
I see your point but the requirement is over 8 years old. And If somebody
uses such an old system, I would call this an exception and not ordinary.
> 2. The download page for WinPT should list the compatible OSs as
> "Windows 95(lim
lly agree with your points, I'd like to offer just one
thought: If your operating environment provides a proper package
manager, you can have dependencies like shell32 >= 4.32. When you tried
to install WinPT, the package manager should tell you that you don't
have the right version of s
> > The version of my SHELL32.dll is 4.00.
>
> That's the problem. You need 4.32 (or anything close to it or newer).
>
>
> > Does this mean, WinPT does no longer support Windows NT (like Microsoft...)?
>
> WinPT supports all Windows versions (95 limi
oblem. You need 4.32 (or anything close to it or newer).
> Does this mean, WinPT does no longer support Windows NT (like Microsoft...)?
WinPT supports all Windows versions (95 limited). The problem is that some
OS components are too old. This is also a problem for other programs and
not ju
Hello,
I tried to install the latest version of WinPT on my Windows NT (SP6a) machine
(file
gnupt-2.6.0_gpg1.4.1-wpt0.9.90-gpgrelay0.955-int.exe).
When starting WinPT I get the error message:
'Der Prozedureinstiegspunkt "SHGetSpecialFolderPathA" konnte in der Dynamic
Link L
EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Randy Burns
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 2:04 PM
To: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Subject: Re: WinPT error on win95
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
> Johan Wevers wrote:
>
> > machine, GnuPG worked fine but WinPT ga
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
> Johan Wevers wrote:
>
> > machine, GnuPG worked fine but WinPT gave the error that WS_32.dll
> > was missing. Can I just copy that file from a newer windows version?
>
> Yes. I also did it in the past. It works.
>
Johan Wevers wrote:
machine, GnuPG worked fine but WinPT gave the error that WS_32.dll
was missing. Can I just copy that file from a newer windows version?
Yes. I also did it in the past. It works.
Is win95 supported at all?
Do you ask if WinPT still supports W95? Not really. It works without
any
Ulf Jaenicke-Rler, wrote:
>You might need to install the Win95 Winsock2 Update. Try to google for
>"Win95 winsock update" and download it from Microsoft.
I'll try to find it. The machine in question has no internet connection
so windows update won't work.
--
ir. J.C.A. Wevers // Physic
Hello,
When I tried to install GnuPG 1.4.1 and WinPT 0.9.90 on an old win95
machine, GnuPG worked fine but WinPT gave the error that WS_32.dll
was missing. Can I just copy that file from a newer windows version?
Is win95 supported at all?
--
ir. J.C.A. Wevers // Physics and science
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 12:03:06 -0600, David Gibbs said:
> I get this error anytime I try to start up WinPT on my XP SP2 system.
> "Sorry, you need a newer GPG version.
> GPG version 1.0.4 requred GPG version 1.2.4"
You probably have an old version of GnuPG somewhere. I sug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I get this error anytime I try to start up WinPT on my XP SP2 system.
"Sorry, you need a newer GPG version.
GPG version 1.0.4 requred GPG version 1.2.4"
I'm running the following ...
WinPT version 0.9.90
... and ...
[C:/GnuPG] ./gp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 05:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> i tested it on a neutral public system [win2k pro],
> that (afaik), has never had gnupg or winpt before.
>
> (not especially a 'spying' system, but also on
>Message: 3
>Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:51:09 -1000
>From: Maxine Brandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: gpg-2-go + winpt + usb drive // do-able !
>On Tuesday 22 March 2005 08:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> as winpt does not need any 'path' or reg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Tuesday 22 March 2005 08:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> as winpt does not need any 'path' or registry entries in windows,
> it can easily be set up on a usb drive to run with gpg-2-go,
> without any installation into windows
as winpt does not need any 'path' or registry entries in windows,
it can easily be set up on a usb drive to run with gpg-2-go,
without any installation into windows, and then run just by
double-clicking on the WinPT.exe file
what is necessary is:
[a] gpg-2-go (http://www.torduninj
Zuxy wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 20:00:41 -0700, David Vallier
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Recently I tried signing a file using winpt-0.9.90rc1 and right
>> after words I get a "box" po
On Sun Mar 20 2005; 20:00, David Vallier wrote:
> Recently I tried signing a file using winpt-0.9.90rc1 and right after
> words I get a "box" popping up saying what? with 2 5-6 digit numbers
> separated by a slash and what appears to be a progress bar below that,
Yes, t
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 20:00:41 -0700, David Vallier
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Recently I tried signing a file using winpt-0.9.90rc1 and right after
> words I get a "box" popping up saying what? with 2 5-6 digit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Recently I tried signing a file using winpt-0.9.90rc1 and right after
words I get a "box" popping up saying what? with 2 5-6 digit numbers
separated by a slash and what appears to be a progress bar below that,
and winpt just sits there lik
83 matches
Mail list logo
