Hi!
As some of you might have noticed, from time to time spam slips
through the filter by means of subscribed users. That is a little bit
annoying but it does not really harm. However, it is worse to reply to
spam or send the mailing list owner a notice of that. That does not
help.
For the
> Here here! Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in
> what you send.
Folks, at the risk of starting a new thread or steering
this thread into an eddy, Postel's Law is now officially
a problem. I strongly (and I mean it) urge ya'll to take
a look at the one or two principal papers
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 21:53:06 +
MFPA articulated:
> Here here! Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you
> send.
I will "liberally"accept a message not CC'd to me if the individual
making the reply would be "conservative" enough not to includ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Wednesday 1 February 2012 at 8:56:29 PM, in
, Doug Barton wrote:
> I already addressed that issue in previous posts. Stop
> trying to force other people to change, and deal with
> what life brings. You'll live a happier life overall.
> :)
On 02/01/2012 03:19, Jerry wrote:
> In any case, it more than amply
> demonstrates my point of the uselessness of "CCing" on a closed list
> such as this one which you interestingly enough did not address
I already addressed that issue in previous posts. Stop trying to force
other people to change
st followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On 01/31/2012 16:17, Jerry wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:26:05 -0800
> Doug Barton articulated:
>
>> On 01/31/2012 05:05, Jerry wrote:
>>> This is an "OPT-IN"list. Some lists, like FreeBSD are open, but not
>>> this one.
>>
>> I don't understand the distinction you're trying to make. Both this
>
ecision. If you would like to cancel
this posting, please visit the following URL: (URL removed by me)
This is an actual reply from a test message I sent awhile ago.
Now, unless the poster intended to wait an indefinite period of time,
said
On 01/31/2012 05:05, Jerry wrote:
> This is an "OPT-IN"list. Some lists, like FreeBSD are open, but not
> this one.
I don't understand the distinction you're trying to make. Both this list
and all of the FreeBSD lists require you to subscribe. In fact FreeBSD
lists also use mailman.
--
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:22:43 +0100
Peter Lebbing articulated:
> On 31/01/12 00:09, John Clizbe wrote:
> > On the Netiquette part of this thread, I too set a Reply-To header
> > that seems at least one person regularly ignores. Please don't CC
> > me on list replies. One
On 31/01/12 00:09, John Clizbe wrote:
On the Netiquette part of this thread, I too set a Reply-To header that seems at
least one person regularly ignores. Please don't CC me on list replies. One copy
is enough.
Well, I don't know if you refer to me, my apologies if so. I know how
ertainly not on-topic for this list. I'm
responding to the list here to respect your Reply-To header, Jerry, but
please respect mine on this thread and follow up off-list if you must
follow up at all.
Let's keep gnupg-users about helping people use GnuPG, not about
discussing unusual mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Sunday 13 June 2010 at 6:01:34 PM, in
,
Jeff Sadowski wrote:
> I read it but didn't see that I had to do anything. Did
> I read it wrong seems a lot of people replied to
> theirs.
I refer you to Werner's later post, after people started re
I read it but didn't see that I had to do anything. Did I read it
wrong seems a lot of people replied to theirs.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
- The following text is an automated response to your message -
Hello, I'm on vacation from Monday, February 27 through Friday, March 3.
I'll be returning on Monday, March 6.
If you need IMMEDIATE URGENT help email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please do not use [EMAIL PROTECTED] unless it requi
- The following text is an automated response to your message -
Hello, I'm on vacation from Monday, February 27 through Friday, March 3.
I'll be returning on Monday, March 6.
If you need IMMEDIATE URGENT help email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please do not use [EMAIL PROTECTED] unless it requi
- The following text is an automated response to your message -
Hello, I'm on vacation from Monday, February 27 through Friday, March 3.
I'll be returning on Monday, March 6.
If you need IMMEDIATE URGENT help email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please do not use [EMAIL PROTECTED] unless it requi
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 08:38:15 -0500
John W. Moore III wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Maxim Britov wrote:
>
> > > Yes, but psi doesn't support sign messages. Tkabber does.
>
> Time for You to check out Psi 0.10 My Friend.
PSI sign presence only at the moment. afa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Maxim Britov wrote:
> > Yes, but psi doesn't support sign messages. Tkabber does.
Time for You to check out Psi 0.10 My Friend.
JOHN :)
Timestamp: Thursday 26 Jan 2006, 08:36 --500 (Eastern Standard Time)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: G
19 matches
Mail list logo
