RE: GPGrelay does not recognize Gpg-2.1 keys; Gpg4win-3beta...

2016-02-12 Thread gnupgpacker
Hello, > Matthias: > Maybe it will become a bit more complicated if it is necessary to > keep the keyrings syncronized in both directions. This will happen at > least if you let GPGRelay "Learn aliases from POP3" Switch off! ;) Serious answer: Latest known version of GPGrelay ist 0.962, e

Re: GPGrelay does not recognize Gpg-2.1 keys; Gpg4win-3beta...

2016-02-12 Thread Peter Lebbing
On 12/02/16 10:28, Matthias Mansfeld wrote: > Maybe it will become a bit more complicated if it is necessary to > keep the keyrings syncronized in both directions. Hehe :). Okay, I'll humour you :). I'd probably extract all known keys from both installations, and propagate deletions. You also st

Re: GPGrelay does not recognize Gpg-2.1 keys; Gpg4win-3beta...

2016-02-12 Thread Matthias Mansfeld
On 12 Feb 2016 at 9:35, gnupgpacker wrote: > Wowh, what a comprehensive answer... :) > THANKS! > > > Furthermore, pipes do generally work on Windows. > > Wouldn't this work? > > gpg2\gpg2.exe --export | gpg14\gpg.exe --import > > Similar pipes are working in Windows. > > > gpg2\gpg2.exe --exp

RE: GPGrelay does not recognize Gpg-2.1 keys; Gpg4win-3beta...

2016-02-12 Thread gnupgpacker
Wowh, what a comprehensive answer... :) THANKS! > Furthermore, pipes do generally work on Windows. > Wouldn't this work? > gpg2\gpg2.exe --export | gpg14\gpg.exe --import Similar pipes are working in Windows. > gpg2\gpg2.exe --export-ownertrust >C:\temp\exported.trust > gpg2\gpg2.exe --output

Re: GPGrelay does not recognize Gpg-2.1 keys; Gpg4win-3beta...

2016-02-11 Thread Peter Lebbing
First of all... it was established in this thread that you could not share the key store between GnuPG 2.1 and 1.4. Why is that the case? I can happily do that here on Linux. The only gotcha is that you don't profit from the speed gains GnuPG 2.1 gets from the new format of the key store. Oh, and t

RE: GPGrelay does not recognize Gpg-2.1 keys; Gpg4win-3beta...

2016-02-11 Thread gnupgpacker
Thanks for hint! > From: Peter Lebbing [mailto:pe...@digitalbrains.com] > Install GnuPG 1.4 alongside 2.1 and manually sync all keys from GnuPG > 2.1 to 1.4, with for instance: > $ gpg2 --export | gpg --import I did get it running even on Windows: gpg2\gpg2.exe --export --output C:\temp\exported.

Re: GPGrelay does not recognize Gpg-2.1 keys; Gpg4win-3beta...

2015-12-21 Thread Samir Nassar
On Monday 21 December 2015 11:53:13 gnupgpacker wrote: > Thanks for hint, that would be a distress way. > But it seems to be limited to v1.4x supported keys only. > What will happen, if v1.4x tries to import gpg-2.x keys with elevated > features? The features are part of GnuPG 2.x and not part of

Re: GPGrelay does not recognize Gpg-2.1 keys; Gpg4win-3beta...

2015-12-21 Thread gnupgpacker
Thanks for hint, that would be a distress way. But it seems to be limited to v1.4x supported keys only. What will happen, if v1.4x tries to import gpg-2.x keys with elevated features? Regards, Chris ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org

Re: GPGrelay does not recognize Gpg-2.1 keys; Gpg4win-3beta...

2015-12-21 Thread Peter Lebbing
On 21/12/15 11:33, gnupgpacker wrote: > So, how to work around and supply keys to GPGrelay even if using gpg version > 2 and up? Install GnuPG 1.4 alongside 2.1 and manually sync all keys from GnuPG 2.1 to 1.4, with for instance: $ gpg2 --export | gpg --import I'm not sure how large the overhead

Re: GPGrelay does not recognize Gpg-2.1 keys; Gpg4win-3beta...

2015-12-21 Thread gnupgpacker
Thanks for answer. It seems GPGrelay is not longer maintained by its developers but is still working with a charme if gpg.exe 1.4x is used. So, how to work around and supply keys to GPGrelay even if using gpg version 2 and up? Regards, Chris http://sites.inka.de/tesla/gpgrelay.html http://is.g

Re: GPGrelay does not recognize Gpg-2.1 keys; Gpg4win-3beta...

2015-12-20 Thread Samir Nassar
On Sunday 20 December 2015 10:44:58 gnupgpacker wrote: > But if using GPGrelay 0.9.6, while starting it displays attached error > message. There seems to be a different key storing location or key format > between 1.4x and 2.1x versions, isn't it? This is not about the key format. It appears that