-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:22:08 +
MFPA <2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net> wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 January 2014 at 11:37:25 PM, in
> , Steve Jones wrote:
>
>
> > A more sophisticated approach
> > would be for OpenPGP to include a new signatu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Friday 24 January 2014 at 11:08:16 PM, in
, Steve Jones wrote:
> I'd really like an email client
> that automatically signs keys at level 1 (persona) of
> anyone who replies with a signed email that quotes a
> significant portion of the tex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Tuesday 28 January 2014 at 11:37:25 PM, in
, Steve Jones wrote:
> A more sophisticated approach
> would be for OpenPGP to include a new signature type
> for this purpose.
There are already more than enough signature types. Wouldn't this le
Hi Steve, gnupg users,
* Steve Jones [24. Jan. 2014]:
> Which reminds me that I'd really like an email client that
> automatically signs keys at level 1 (persona) of anyone who replies
> with a signed email that quotes a significant portion of the text I
> sent, as this effectively counts as a cha
On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 20:13:30 +0100
Leo Gaspard wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:08:16PM +, Steve Jones wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > Finally there's the possibility of explicit verification, if someone
> > sends me a challenge and I publish that challenge's signature on my
> > blog then that v
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:08:16PM +, Steve Jones wrote:
> [...]
>
> Finally there's the possibility of explicit verification, if someone
> sends me a challenge and I publish that challenge's signature on my
> blog then that verifies that I am in control of that private key and
> can publish t
On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 17:16:28 -0500
Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> what do you mean "complete connection security via OpenPGP"? OpenPGP
> is not a stream-based communications protocol, it's a specification
> of a message format and a certificate format. Inventing a new
> stream-based communicatio
On 01/24/2014 12:48 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 12:15:40 -0500 Daniel Kahn Gillmor
> wrote:
>
>> http://web.monkeysphere.info/
>
> This looks pretty cool, and does cover some of the things I've been
> thinking about. I've been wondering about communications secured with
> OpenP
I think it makes a lot of sense to be able to associate more things with
OpenPGP keys. I'm particularly interested in seeing OTR keys and XMPP
identities in OpenPGP keys.
.hc
On 01/23/2014 05:50 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
> I've been thinking about UIDs in keys, rfc4880 section 5.1 says that by
>
On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 12:15:40 -0500
Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> There are already systems that make use of the flexibility in this
> field. For example SSH hosts can publish their RSA host key in an
> OpenPGP certificate using the monkeysphere (i'm a contributor to the
> monkeysphere project):
>
On 01/23/2014 05:50 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
> I've been thinking about UIDs in keys, rfc4880 section 5.1 says that by
> convention a UID is an rfc2822 email address but this is not a
> requirement[1]. Gnupg does enforce that restriction unless you explicitly
> disable it. It would seem to make se
I've been thinking about UIDs in keys, rfc4880 section 5.1 says that by
convention a UID is an rfc2822 email address but this is not a requirement[1].
Gnupg does enforce that restriction unless you explicitly disable it. It would
seem to make sense to include other strings that can identify a us
12 matches
Mail list logo
